Gintonious wrote: » Incredible that Obama even has to do this. Can't wait to see what Trump says to this.
BonnieSituation wrote: » That link wasn't working for me: Mattis tears into Trump: 'We are witnessing the consequences of three years without mature leadership'https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/03/politics/mattis-statement-trump/index.html --- He's really really gunning for him here. I just can't see with this pressure piling upon Trump from all sides from now to November how he wins. It's just not likely.
hotmail.com wrote: » Yes his speeches make white people feel better about themselves. Great for speeches, poor on action.
PropJoe10 wrote: » It wasn't likely for him to beat Clinton in 2016 either. This man is not normal are neither are his supporters/cult followers. People need to get out and vote this guy down and not be complacent like they were in 2016. I think the words from Mattis today will hurt his support in the Republican party a lot.
BonnieSituation wrote: » You're right about 2016, but where are those MOR rust belt voters going to go now? A ranting ineffective racist or a folksy charming empathetic presidential Biden?
Itssoeasy wrote: » No decision before august 1st according to the Biden campaign and no Kamala Harris is in no way nailed on. I don't think she would be a good VP pick as outside of California I don't know how she'd go over.
listermint wrote: » Always and forever finishing with a trump excuse. Convenient as it is sad that the man warrants any form of defence.
Manic Moran wrote: » Your definition of "excuse" is clearly different to mine. Saying it's a good thing his influence on the response is limited doesn't sound like an excuse to me. Maybe I should change my dictionary to whatever you're using, just for consistency. I use M-W because it's convenient. "excuse noun ex·cuse | \ ik-ˈskyüs \ Definition of excuse 1: the act of excusing 2a: something offered as justification or as grounds for being excused b excuses plural : an expression of regret for failure to do something c: a note of explanation of an absence 3: JUSTIFICATION, REASON"
Overheal wrote: » Speaking of that what about what the CIA has been saying? They’re warning us this smells an awful lot like a country collapsing. And they know a thing or two because they’ve collapsed one or two.
duploelabs wrote: » So being a military man yourself, what do you make of Mattis' comments?
extra gravy wrote: » The resting heart rate of highly conditioned athletes is between 40 and 60. There's not a hope in hell his is 63. More lies to add to his collection. Imagine voting for someone who can't even tell the truth about something as simple as his height. So pathetic.
listermint wrote: » I'd also be interested in his thoughts on the unidentified , unbadged , full kit military style units deployed across DC at the moment with apparently no identified leadership.
Quin_Dub wrote: » And even on the 2nd attempt , when he listed a Florida address he still might have committed Voter fraud. No one is allowed to permanently live at Mar-a-Lago - The various licences and certificates etc. all stipulate that it cannot be used as a private residence. So - If Trump isn't legally allowed to call Mar-a-Lago his permanent residence , then his recent GOP Primary vote was illegal.
Cookie_Monster wrote: » And the chances of anything actually being done about it in reality??
salmocab wrote: » Is this not more a breach of planning than voter fraud though? This seems to me to be another one of a huge pile of Trumps stupid things but I’m not sure it’s as big a deal as some would have it. There are countless reasons at this stage why he shouldn’t be in the position he’s in and I think this is very far down the list. That said I’m enjoying the irony of him jumping up and down about voter fraud when there is little real suggestion of it and he’s possibly quite close to it himself.
[Deleted User] wrote: » I'm fat as **** and not fit yet have a resting heart rate under 60 and perfect blood pressure. Life ain't fair.
circadian wrote: » I'd certainly be concerned about an attempt to cancel the election due to a combination of civil unrest and pandemic. If anything were to happen to Ruth Bader Ginsburg then we're looking at a stacked Supreme Court who would almost certainly back the Administration in any attempt to stall or cancel elections. As far as I can see, it is in their benefit to escalate and antagonise to draw this out as close to November as possible. It also works with downplaying covid and I wouldn't be surprised if some in the Administration would prefer if that continued to get worse also as it sows even.more distrust and discord. The USA is at a tipping point. Either an authoritarian government takes control by the end of year, or this will result in wholesale political change in the next few years.
duploelabs wrote: » If the elections are cancelled, then Nancy Pelosi becomes president in January 2021
banie01 wrote: » That's lunacy! I'm a couple of inches taller than Don, 30 odd years younger, and 30lbs lighter! I wish my BP and resting heart rate looked that good and that's with me being far more active than golfing and tweeting!
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » But would the idiot in chief try to find a way to circumvent that protocol by claiming special measures needed to combat <insert crisis>. As someone said if anything happens to RBG he could stack the SC and have them vote on special measures. Just a thought.