FishOnABike wrote: » Silent spreading in schools could be a problem alright. Between the already high proportion of asymptomatic but contagious cases and younger children seeming to have milder symptoms it may be more difficult to detect until a more vulnerable person is infected.
Zahir Bitter Cellist wrote: » It won't be so much though, I mean even now we have virtually zero reported community cases. Most cases now relate to known clusters. It is projected that the cases will die out come end of July. If we continue the way we are going then it wouldn't be a big risk and faster testing and contact tracing will stop any reintroduction before it has a chance to spread much.
Spanish Eyes wrote: » Indeed, and all families who have kids in a school. But anyway. The Dutch return to school scheme seems to be working ok. Can't find the link right now, but they have pupils back for two days at a time. Each class is in for two days, then a deep clean, then the next cohort is in for the last two days. Another deep clean. So Monday, Tuesday..... deep clean Wednesday, Thursday Friday for the next classes. Another deep clean. I dunno, my NDN has a grandson in school in Eindhoven and this is what I'm told.
wirelessdude01 wrote: » Two things. 1. That idea was floated about partial weeks in school or week on, week off scenario and you had some on here giving out stink about lazy teachers and so on and would they not just get on with things. 2. The money for the deep clean, daily/hourly/weekly. We talked about this as a staff and where we could get the money to facilitate it, money to pay for the materials needed. Sure as hell won't be coming from the government.
kandr10 wrote: » Two very good points. The amount of times it’s been said on here ‘sure why can’t we get on with things the way they are in Europe’ without taking into account the measures they’re implementing. The funding is a huge issue. People often complain about being asked for a voluntary contribution, not realising it literally pays for the most basic of things like heating and toilet paper. If everyone thought we should model ourselves on what European schools are doing in education, we’d have far more people rallying for better funding and smaller class sizes generally. The comparisons to Europe are only in relation to the handling of covid unfortunately!
FishOnABike wrote: » Even if the government made the funds adailable to deep clean every school twice a week where would they find enough specialist companies to do the work ?
Mrsmum wrote: » I was talking to a friend of mine the other day and her sister is a nurse. She was saying when her sister comes home from work, the routine is to have an immediate shower and put her uniform on for a wash and then greet her family. It got me thinking about teachers clothes and that it might be no bad idea for teachers to be putting together a kind of no fuss weekly 'uniform' for themselves. Often our nicest clothes do not stand up to constant washing and ironing. It's a small issue but still.
wirelessdude01 wrote: » I have what I consider 'work' clothes anyway. Don't we all?
screamer wrote: » I think there is a real lack of leadership from the government on this. Measures take time to implement yet they seem to not even gave a solid plan. It’s unfair on the kids, parents and teachers.I think a better question is, how long will the kids be able to stay in school before the next wave comes. It will come with flu season so I fully expect another major disruption to schools/ crèches in the late autumn again, and I’d like to see some sort of cohesive continuity plan that is uniform with expectations and guidance for virtual learning
screamer wrote: » I think there is a real lack of leadership from the government on this. Measures take time to implement yet they seem to not even gave a solid plan. It’s unfair on the kids, parents and teachers. I think a better question is, how long will the kids be able to stay in school before the next wave comes. It will come with flu season so I fully expect another major disruption to schools/ crèches in the late autumn again, and I’d like to see some sort of cohesive continuity plan that is uniform with expectations and guidance for virtual learning
plodder wrote: » Deep cleaning seems completely OTT. All it takes is one child to sneeze on a table during the day and the work is wasted. Much better for teachers to watch out for sneezing and get kids to spray/wipe their tables regularly and after sneezing etc.
is_that_so wrote: » Personally wonder about the constant alarm over the second wave myself as we now apparently have a system that could respond a lot better to that.
khalessi wrote: » Children would not be allowed to clean up fer themselves. And a school would need to deep cleaned daily properly for coss infection purpose consideriing how many people are in them.
lulublue22 wrote: » I really can not see daily deep cleaning going ahead. The cost and time associated with it seems prohibitive.
khalessi wrote: » I feel the same but I do think it should be put to the department. Afterall people keep demanding on this threads that schools need to be open. Look at Europe etc. Well lets look at Europe, the schools have various policies implemented, smaller classes, in different days, but all have whole stragegies of cleaning and hand washing and disinfection of schools. The least we should be demanding for our children as parents is a guaranteed clean environment. The government cannot say they are looking at Europe and then just write a fudge document full of media soundbites but leaving it to the teachers to sort out, which is more than likely what will happen and if teachers object due to Health and safety we will be told we are complaining and being fussy, despite a pandemic in full flow.e
Mrsmum wrote: » A bell ringing every hour and all children sanitizing their hands then and every time they enter or leave the classroom will be as good as it gets imo. Fortunately that small step is actually of huge benefit with this disease.
kandr10 wrote: » In theory this sounds like a good idea and is of course a necessity. Just to point out some of the practical difficulties a lot of schools would face - classes would have to put on timetables for hand washing as there’s often 4-5 sinks to share between several classes. In my school it would be 120 kids roughly to 4 sinks. Also most likely a lot of schools would have to have a one way system to prevent people passing each other in narrow corridors. Co-ordinating children needing to leave for hand washing when they sneeze, cough, enter or leave or whatever on top of what’s scheduled would be hard with that in mind. None of it is impossible but just pointing out logistical difficulties people might not be aware of if they’ve not worked in a school. It takes literally 10-15 mins to get a class to the bathroom all at once.
morebabies wrote: » As well as kids having to be isolated for 14 days if displaying any illness symptoms, another issue would be if there is a confirmed case in a school, that school would surely have to close temporarily or if it didn't, parents would probably keep their kids off until the threat had passed. In that case the Dept should be telling schools shortly, as well as figuring out the hygiene and social distancing aspects, to be ready at any given moment to close the school and transition immediately to full time Internet learning until further notice. That's a huge ask, I don't envy working under those circumstances.
khalessi wrote: » We may be down to 0.04% but it took just one case to put us where we are now, so precautions are necessary no matter how eager parents are to have their children back in school
Mrsmum wrote: » Forget about sinks. Not doable to do it that way. Hand sanitizers all the way. Children not allowed into school without it in their schoolbags and provided by school for those who can't afford it.
lulublue22 wrote: » Schools dont have money for adequate hot water providing hand sanitizer is a very big ask. Whatever is agreed upon it will take considerable financial investment by the government.