.
pixelburp wrote: » Tension doesn't mean thinking characters are going to die, otherwise no drama would be tense cos we know the main cast are safe. Prequels for me are only redundant, dramatically, if we've already seen the summation or most relevant part of a characters life. Han Solo, for instance as a classic example. While that can be said of Spock, we saw so little of Pike before Discovery there's more than enough emotional space for a prequel show to flesh his story out while having enough gaps to put tension in.
FVP3 wrote: » For me its 0%. I never everyone to die. Even watching the TNG episodes where the Enterprise blew up ( there were 2). Why? Because that would have meant the rest of the series would be about some other ship with a different cast.
FVP3 wrote: » Seriously how many times do you watch a Star Trek episode and assume there is a genuine risk to the cast and crew in any encounter with anything?
Stark wrote: » It's Star Trek, not Game of Thrones. "No-one is safe" is not the primary driver for the show.
Justin Credible Darts wrote: » I was never aware that tasha was leaving TNG, or Dax leaving DS9 at the time i saw the episodes, it was not like we lived in a time when spoilers were so freely available so them leaving did surprise me
GSPfan wrote: » Jesus I came in here thinking people would be as delighted as I am about this and I’m reading people moan about knowing that Pike can’t die/will die so there’s no point! I haven’t really liked Discovery. Picard was a lot of Meh. This is hopefully everything I expect it to be. I want an episodic show back. Just give us episodes that aren’t serving an overall universe ending arc please. Please.
Bobtheman wrote: » I am looking forward to it..I'm sure they will work out pikes dilemma easy enough. This is sci fi after all.
Stark wrote: » Wasn't a huge fan of Doctor Boyce in the original. "Doctor or bartender?". Cringe. Gary Mitchell/Elizabeth Dehner could be cool. For the record, Discovery seems to be set after the events of "the cage". Not sure will they set this show in the same time or will they go back to the start when Spock first joined the Enterprise crew like in the Short Treks.
pixelburp wrote: » Mention of The Cage reminds me of that episode where Pike learns of his fate during Discovery Season 2. Trek loves a good "messing with the timeline" plot as much as the next person so perhaps that's going to be the Big Bad or arc? Not so much Pike's ultimate fate but rather attempts to dick around with that fixed point in time. The broad antagonist being either someone trying to prevent or hasten that fate. Could be an interesting dramatic angle if Pike has to fight someone ultimately trying to prevent his mutilation. Would put pressure on his sense of faith & spirituality.
AMKC wrote: » Can't say I would be mad about that. I hope they go for an episodic format but that they develop all the main characters along the way too. It does not need a season long big bad. Sure give us someone like the Klingons but not the Klingons and defiantly not the Romulans as they have been done enough. Maybe the Nausicans or some other race that we heard a small bit about but do not know much about.
OSI wrote: » Much rumoured spin off series starring Pike confirmed:https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2020/05/star-trek-will-go-to-strange-new-worlds-in-new-spinoff-series/?amp=1