Wibbs wrote: » I'd have a lot more time for those who just came out and honestly said they just don't want to wear a mask because they feel "weird", because that is the guts of it for many if not most.
McGiver wrote: » From gov.ie This is ridiculous cowardice and lack of leadership. It's like saying "we recommend you to pay taxes but then saying you may chose to pay them". If the article starts with "recommendation" then it should say "We recommend you to wear a clothes face covering:".
riffmongous wrote: » I'm pretty sure I'm one of a handful of people here properly trained in using PPE, and probably the only one who has actually had to judge others people's PPE in real life
Tipperary animal lover wrote: » What this virus has shown people are dirty and really self absorbed...... rant over
Boggles wrote: » It's beyond loony tunes, only matched by what was a farcical "press conference" "recommending" them. Honestly if I hadn't did my research on masks and just watched that clusterfook yesterday, I wouldn't wear one. Also the "journalists" at these things are beyond bad, 89 questions asking for clarification between 'hardware' and 'homeware' :rolleyes: and no relevant ones on masks or why things have now changed.
Seanergy wrote: » I know it's only day 1 of new facecovering policy but it's not working and it won't be successful. What do a post by Simon Harris on twitter, article in Irish Times, GOV.ie and HSE.ie all have in common? They all fail to mention to wash your hands before taking of your face covering. One goes even further by advising you to wash your hands and then dispose of your dirty face covering. This half arsed 11th hour u-turn saveface is adding to the noise and tainting a really practical life saving measure, that will be needed to be adhered to by all in the future. Gross negligence.
Seanergy wrote: » Gross negligence.
Kivaro wrote: » This most definitely will happen. My own experience shopping during the week; happened to be behind a woman with a mask and industrial scale rubber gloves at the checkout. Prior to that, she would give anyone the 'evil stare' if they ventured 10 feet within her circumference a.k.a. her invisible virus shield. Now, I totally respected all that, but when she finished packing her weekly shopping, she removed one of her gloves (with great stress), routed through her bag for her card, inserted the card, and keyed in her pin with her ungloved hand, fixing her face mask with the same hand as she was waiting for it to process. And after taking the receipt and coupons with her bare hand, she then put on the massive rubber glove and off she went. Masks will be a new experience to lots of people, so there will be a learning curve for most. While I'm on here, this morning I made myself a kick-ass homemade mask with a bandana........... in about 45 seconds. Very happy with this multi-layered and sturdy mask. Here's the short YouTube video I used:
Arrival wrote: » Just letting you know, a test was done on effectiveness and bandanas and scarves are the least effective at blocking droplets as they're not tightly woven enough. You should use one of the t-shirt tutorials with rubber bands instead and use a thick cotton t-shirt instead, add some kind of filter to make it even better then
Wibbs wrote: » Genuinely, what did you expect but the usual from the same barely competent eejits that have bounced from confusion to contrariness over the last three months?
Kivaro wrote: » Thanks for the heads up. It would definitely be insufficient if I just wrapped the bandana around my head Jesse James style, but doing it like the video actually gives you 6 layers due to all the fold-overs. And it is 100% cotton. Some of the scarves used as masks that I see on television are very flimsy and I wouldn't trust them. But point taken on the woven aspect.
Seanergy wrote: » Genuinely, I thought I had zero expectations, I know realise I was holding onto a small flicker of hope, whoops it's just gone out. Truth is face coverings should have been introduced months ago as an emergency measure whilst supplies of FFP2 grade masks were distributed to citizen's. Time to put the face coverings away and pull out the KN95 FFP2 non-valve masks.
Boggles wrote: » Newflash, they are now "recommending" face coverings. So are you saying they are now putting the general populous at more risk with their advice?
Wibbs wrote: » So you also saw people failing at social distancing and hand washing protocols, both which have been pushed from the start as a means to reduce the risk of spread and recommendations you likely agree with, yet the masks are the sticking point? The medical experts rolled out by the HSE have come out with a few howlers, including potentially deadly ones. Have we forgotten the "reopen the care homes" and "asymptomatic spread is of almost no risk" from the same medical experts here? Drink driving and smoking rates are way down on what they were even a decade ago. Clearly the campaigns didn't work. Apparently they didn't work for hand washing and social distancing either. Oh wait, they mostly did. And again masks are the outlier. The resistance to mask wearing is little to do with science or even logic, it's almost entirely down to two things: early concerns about PPE for medical staff and a deep cultural resistance to wearing them. Note how many wear gloves and they're "acceptable" to the wider culture because they're less obvious, don't cover our faces and are culturally OK, yet they are far easier to contaminate and nobody I've seen knows how to use them. I'd have a lot more time for those who just came out and honestly said they just don't want to wear a mask because they feel "weird", because that is the guts of it for many if not most.
Arrival wrote: » Just feel like giving up hope altogether now to be honest. We live in an amateur, mediocre country lads. Simple as that.
Manion wrote: » I cannot speak for the general population but certainty from what I'm seeing people wearing masks without having a clue how to use them appear to exhibiting more risky behaviour with a) totally negates the value of the mask and b) actually put themselves at greater risk compared to people without masks.
GT89 wrote: » I am convinced there are some people usually men wear them purely because they look cool like they're something out of an apocalyptic film rather than actually needing to wear the mask for protection. It's usually men wearing the proper filter mask whilst women just wear the surgical masks.
Away With The Fairies wrote: » Remove it from behind? As people clearly need guidance similar to the instructions found on Lidl toilet paper... They didn't even mention remove by the ear loops.
leahyl wrote: » I bought a mask online a few weeks back and wore it for the first time today going shopping to Dunnes but unfortunately it’s very tight around the ears with the elastic and then started popping off one ear and I didn’t feel like it was very breathable. I took it off when I got back to the car (by the loops!) and went to lidl and didn’t wear it :-( I think it’s a bit too constricted even though it’s well made; I’m fairly anxious at the moment too so my breathing isn’t great Does anyone have a suggestion for somwhere I could buy a mask which is breathable (soft material) but also secure without being too tight?
timsey tiger wrote: » Mask might not have ear loops. From behind, works for ear loops too.
jackofalltrades wrote: » It's an often repeated claim that imperfect use of masks could lead to a greater risk than wearing no masks at all. I've never seen it backed up with facts though. There are a lot of countries mandating mask wearing for the first time. So if imperfect use made the situation worse surely we'd see the data by now. But all we seem to see are declining rates of infection.
tromtipp wrote: » I'm sure that's true, but it's also irrelevant here. Masks aren't being recommended as PPE (though they may give some limited protection to people wearing them) but as a public health measure. A person wearing a mask is much less likely to transmit infection than a person without one. The advice given to people using masks as protection from eg smoke or toxic fumes really has nothing to do with this situation. This is about not being self-centred, but accepting mild inconvenience in the public interest..
Never.Give.Up wrote: » Hi. First thread. Reviewed guidelines. But do let me know if I make an oopsie. Found a huge mask poll (respect) with debates and politics, but couldn't find a consolidated point for simply sharing places (online and offline) that are selling masks in Ireland, what mask and how much. So I thought I'd start. This thread is not for debates, just discussing and sharing information on acquiring masks, maintaining them and even touching on DIY aspects. Also worth mentioning, if this thread gains significant traction, I might make a website and fund it for free for a year that shows people where they can buy masks, which mask, and what price. Kind of like what pumps.ie did. I/We can also include credible infographic advice on the handling of masks, which seems to be a big issue from reading the mask poll. FYI, half of my family are doctors etc in Asia, particularly in the countries that contained the virus very well and where everyone is well informed about, and accustomed to, wearing masks. I can further contribute from that standpoint if needed.
Akrasia wrote: » My local Lidl has boxes of 50 masks for sale but they’re 43 euros a box,
YFlyer wrote: » Can these masks be washed and reused?