FVP3 wrote: » We definitely need to take more money out of the economy as this crisis unfolds.
Damian Faint Carp wrote: » Not a hope, cutting nurses pay during this would create a political storm
mariaalice wrote: » What is the obsession with nurses? there are hundreds of thousands of other public servants.
mlem123 wrote: » I hope not.. I'm a recent entrant in the HSE but have been redeployed for months, now working harder than I ever have anywhere else I've worked and the idea of being rewarded with a pay cut would be upsetting to say the least
mariaalice wrote: » Will, there be public service pay cuts and cuts to services themselves after COVID 19? interesting discussion on RTE 1 radio about this, on the other hand, the likes of David McWilliams take a different view on how we can pay for this.
ShareShare wrote: » Its a pandemic. They're risking their lives to help save us. When its not a pandemic, when you are at your weakest.. they help you. This is why we care about them.
ted1 wrote: » The thing with public service pay is that those on low incomes shouldn’t be cut. While those on higher incomes are paying 52% tax which goes back to the employer. Do really lots of times it’s just optics. Take a 2,000 pay cut State that’s 1040 euro Employee gets 960. Employee pays 23% VAT on say 600 worth if good So another 138 goes back to employer Say other 360 goes on services at 13% tax, so another 48 euro. Out of 2,000. The state are taking back 1,226 anyway. But the 2,000 is supporting business and jobs. So really the state would achieve nothing by pay cuts
Bicyclette wrote: » There are a lot of public sector employees currently doing a 37.5 hour week at the moment for roughly €150 more than the Covid payment - e.g. 500 pw or less vs €350 pw. By the time you take off deductions, there isn't a significant difference. Its €4 per hour more gross. These people are working in places such as Social Welfare and Revenue processing payments, doing contact tracing, and other things that are keeping this country going. Take for example someone on the bottom of the Clerical Officer Scale. They earn €461 per week gross. Just €111 more than the Covid Payment. Over 37.5 hours, that works out at €2.97 per hour more. GROSS. How could you possibly cut those wages? There is a perception that the public service are very well paid. The Post 2011 entrants are not. Link to the actual pay rates here: https://www.forsa.ie/about-forsa/divisions/civil-service/civil-service-pay-scales/ Remember most people in the public service are at Clerical Officer Grade.
mariaalice wrote: » The COVID payment has nothing to do with it, its a short term emergency payment. a very odd view to take, the lower end of the basic clerical salary is poor alright.
Mad_maxx wrote: » well thats good to know ( that they werent - arent earning much ) , the vast majority of the clerical officers ive dealt with down the years , i wouldnt trust them to run to the shops to get me a newspaper , they were that incompetent
Mad_maxx wrote: » its better than what most receptionists or low level secretaries do in the private sector and they dont have a guarenteed pension differences between public and private are widest at the lower end
Bicyclette wrote: » Take for example someone on the bottom of the Clerical Officer Scale. They earn €461 per week gross. Just €111 more than the Covid Payment. Over 37.5 hours, that works out at €2.97 per hour more. GROSS. How could you possibly cut those wages? There is a perception that the public service are very well paid. The Post 2011 entrants are not. Link to the actual pay rates here: https://www.forsa.ie/about-forsa/divisions/civil-service/civil-service-pay-scales/ Remember most people in the public service are at Clerical Officer Grade.
Fred Cryton wrote: » No no, silly. This is Ireland. In Ireland, we don't "cut" anything. We instead identify the narrow band of hard working middle income private sector higher rate taxpayers (around 20% of the population), and we simply increase their taxes yet again. More welfare and more public sector pay, sure why not? Wouldn't it be cruel not to? Just identify those people, tax them once again, and then pat yourself on the back for reducing "inequality".