ChelseaRentBoy wrote: » Outside Lidl waiting in the weekly shop queue. 1 in 10 tops with masks. Pure insanity.
Wibbs wrote: » Not really C. The public have been told that they're of no value outside of hospitals or if you're already sick and have very much resisted changing that viewpoint, so not a shock that most people are hearing this and believing it and not wearing masks. For fun see how many are wearing gloves. I noted more gloves on show than masks. The public have been told that gloves are a bad plan(and they are), but there would be far less cultural resistance to wearing them so more appear to be doing so.
Mike3287 wrote: » Anyone wearing gloves instant idiot
khalessi wrote: » Gloves are handy, once you know how to take them off properly after use. I have cuts on my hands so I wear gloves and disinfect bank card after same as if I wasnt wearing gloves. Im used to wearing med gloves and dont touch my face but that is a habit anyone can get into.
Mike3287 wrote: » True I havent seen anyone with gloves, mask, eyewear on Always just gloves Which is idiotic
khalessi wrote: » If you do it is probably me lol:D
Pharmaceutical and nonpharmaceutical measures against respiratory infections are available. Pharmaceuticals such as vaccines and antiviral medications are highly effective in eradicating respiratory infections, as evidenced in the case of smallpox. However, as vaccines and antiviral medications take time to develop and are limited in supply, they are unable to sufficiently contain an outbreak caused by new pathogens, especially in the early stages of the outbreak.(8-10) Nonpharmaceutical interventions, on the other hand, are not only able to aid in the control of the early stages of a new outbreak, but are also useful in everyday disease prevention in the general population.(8,10) Measures such as frequent handwashing have been proven to be effective in preventing the transmission of viral infections (odds ratio [OR] 0.45).(11-13) Nonpharmaceutical interventions are a cheap and noninvasive method to reduce mortality and morbidity from respiratory infections. Aside from handwashing, the use of facemasks is also valuable in infectious disease control, especially in circumventing droplet transmission.(14,15) For example, the effectiveness of surgical masks and N95 masks in blocking the transmission of SARS are 68% and 91%, respectively.(7) Facemasks, when fitted properly, effectively disrupt the forward momentum of particles expelled from a cough or sneeze, preventing disease transmission. Even if the facemasks are ill-fitting, they are still able to interrupt the particles and airborne viruses sufficiently, such that these pathogens do not reach the breathing zones of people nearby.
otnomart wrote: » Bought my first two surgical masks last Saturday. Out food shopping today, so wore it for the first time. Followed a tip of giving a shape to the nose when I put it on, so it was not too unconfortable. Was out for no more than 30 mins overall, so when I got home, removed gloves, washed hands, removed the mask and placed it in a open ziploc bag. Washed hands again. All these new routine steps feel like a dystopian movie, anyway whatever stops catching it and spreading it, must be worth it.
Away With The Fairies wrote: » Considering that this is a disease that is still baffling doctors and scientists, shouldn't we all have masks/face coverings. To at least slow down the spread.
khalessi wrote: » It is all to do with lack of availability as we know. Im waiting for the guidelines on face covers
Away With The Fairies wrote: » I think they really want herd immunity. They only shut things to make it look like they were doing something. Invite all the travellers in and spread infection with no quarantine. And our prime minister a doctor.
khalessi wrote: » Seriously!!! I havent nursed in years but still keep myself up to date, as he more than likely has, and I am out of the game longer than him. It stand to him as he understands immediately what is being discussed without needing med jargon changed, it help for decision making etc especially in a pandemic. He has made mistakes but has also made good decisions too.
Arrival wrote: » Which are?
khalessi wrote: » The gas thing is, there is no proof yet people become immune after getting it and wont get it again. Could herd immunity be playing with fire?
Arrival wrote: » They really should tell us this if it's the case, it's ****ing ridiculous if they're leaning towards that and not coming out to actually tell the people in the country they're running, it's really important
ChelseaRentBoy wrote: » Funny enough you right. I'm just back home and I'd say circa 70% with gloves 10-15% masks.
Away With The Fairies wrote: » They are introducing new measures for workplaces when they reopen, not sharing pens, bottles or cups. Temperature monitoring, one way in one way out... All these measures are mandatory. HSA can close businesses if they don't follow the guidelines. Funny how they can make these changes mandatory on businesses and yet the main way this spreads is through respiratory droplets and masks/face coverings still aren't mandatory.
Away With The Fairies wrote: » All these measures on businesses, which is fair enough... They must provide hand sanitizer, tissues, clinical waste bags. Not one mention on providing face masks. The very last point, where 2 metre distance isn't possible, a barrier or a sneeze guard must be in place. So they have to put in barriers... How about having a barrier on our faces? That's that on face masks/face coverings anyways.
Away With The Fairies wrote: » All these measures on businesses, which is fair enough... .
dublin99 wrote: » Everyone believes it is the face masks that has stopped the community transmission by asymptomatic or pre symptomatic carriers, and by doing that the transmission chain is effectively broken.