gozunda wrote: » Do they? So which societies are those? Perhaps the Socciety for moaners and groaners or the Society for the perpetually outraged?
CinemaGuy45 wrote: » So you are operating on emotion you don't like the way I post. Facts mean nothing to you the man who was advising the British Government on the lockdown had is stupid fancy bit over twice and her husband had covid symptoms. His predictions were off the wall.Sane societies isolated the vulnerable and the sick not the backbone of the economy. This deserves a new thread because this is massive news.
weldoninhio wrote: » I'm important enough to still be employed. :rolleyes:
Nika Bolokov wrote: » Just because some lad was dying for a ride doesn't mean we are now immune to covid. Some doctors smoke, they shouldn't but that doesn't mean we should all go out and buy 20. I think your caught up in the far right nonsense that is playing this as because we acted and people didn't die we didn't need to act.
CinemaGuy45 wrote: » Look at the headline this is the so called experts who recommended this nonsense. By the way he hubby had suspected covid.
CinemaGuy45 wrote: » So you are operating on emotion you don't like the way I post. Facts mean nothing to you the man who was advising the British Government on the lockdown had is stupid fancy bit over twice and her husband had covid symptoms. His predictions were off the wall. Sane societies isolated the vulnerable and the sick not the backbone of the economy.This deserves a new thread because this is massive news.
alchemist33 wrote: » Thanks. I thanked the post after this prompt. That "news" report was put out the same day as the UK developed the greatest number of deaths in Europe, which is a little more than suspicious. Its completely unrelated to the merits or not of lockdown (and we never had one btw).
CinemaGuy45 wrote: » By the way emotion not brainpower. The HSE put covid cases into the care homes and everybody else is meant to be on lockdown? Use your brain not your emotion and that goes for those who thanked that post.
petes wrote: » On purpose?
She made a second trip on April 8 despite telling friends she suspected her husband - an academic in his thirties - had coronavirus symptoms.
CinemaGuy45 wrote: » The HSE put covid cases into the care homes and everybody else is meant to be on lockdown? .
endacl wrote: » Jaysus. He’s off again... :rolleyes:
cdeb wrote: » Are over 45s not people?
Glenomra wrote: » Why aren't the small businesses all on lockdown screaming while the multiples prosper.
NIMAN wrote: » His affair? Or the lockdown?
Plumbthedepths wrote: » Don't know about you but if I lost a valuable member of my family as the woman (she's not a he) claimed I wouldn't be on Boards a few hours after their death using the situation as a stick to beat another poster with. That's just me though, I think death deserves more respect.
CinemaGuy45 wrote: » There are 332 under 45s dead in the UK.
u_wot_m8 wrote: » The whole thing is a farce.