sailing wrote: » I suspect all of the airlines will soon be doing circuits for currency.
billy few mates wrote: » .He reckons that once this crisis has passed they'll only return the fleet will be less than half the size they were before this thing started so won't need the numbers they now have.
Not sure if this was already posted, but I found it on Youtube, RC model of an MD-11 in Aer Lingus livery;
BonnieSituation wrote: » I thought they were just gonna drive around and sound like the real thing. I did not expect them to fly! Amazing.
AndyBoBandy wrote: » If you go down the YouTube rabbit hole, there’s a whole world of replica RC jets of all shape and size, that fly and are made to stunning detail, and painted in lots of various liveries.
AndyBoBandy wrote: » If you go down the YouTube rabbit hole, there’s a whole world of replica RC jets of all shape and size,.......... .
Reece Embarrassed Judo wrote: » I see EI8542 is scheduled to fly Vancouver to Toronto today. Is this flight actually happening?
EchoIndia wrote: » That's a codeshare with Air Canada, flight AC102 AFAIK.https://info.flightmapper.net/flight/Aer_Lingus_EI_8542
AndyBoBandy wrote: » Not sure if this was already posted, but I found it on Youtube, RC model of an MD-11 in Aer Lingus livery; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jhkfExFG2B8
Mebuntu wrote: » https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jhkfExFG2B8
[Deleted User] wrote: » Jeez it doesn’t take much for these topics to get side tracked does it ?!
AMKC wrote: » Not sure if this was on here already but I think this Aer Lingus jet looks great,https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fOtDr8TjFL4 That's the livery all Aer Lingus jets should have.
Sheep Shagger wrote: » Is part of the IRFU sponsorship deal, it's used to fly the team around Europe where required, is used on the LHR route outside of those requirements. Not feasible to have the fleet in it given the players featured change, their respray bill would be astronomical.
jowidon wrote: » Hi all. With the low load factor for pax on most services that are running, I'm surprised that DUB-KIR and DUB-CFN are surviving. I don't suppose they are moving significant freight on the ATR. Are they obliged to keep these routes officially operating to access PSO funding? I would have thought they could make an exception to temporarily suspend any operating obligations under the current circumstances.