biko wrote: » 21092 cases 2586 dead 12.3% deaths of known cases Numbers from FHMs own tracking pagehttps://experience.arcgis.com/experience/09f821667ce64bf7be6f9f87457ed9aa
cnocbui wrote: » The Swedish government are saying act responsibly and do what you want within that guidelines that doesn't involve a risk of either transmitting or getting the virus.
Poorside wrote: » And that's fine, if you could trust all Irish people to behave with the greater good in mind, they won't. Driving to work this morning I could see a distinct increase in traffic, and I've seen pictures of queues of 200 people for Aldi for bloody garden furniture, from 3 different cities. People are selfish, greedy and arrogant. I'm sick of this lockdown because I know the lengths my family have gone to and I see people acting like it's a long holiday, I'm angry today because idiots are keeping me from seeing some of my family for another 2 weeks.
cnocbui wrote: » That is socially responsible. You are missing the whole point. There is no greater virus transmission mechanism involved in driving a hundred km to pick up a trampoline than driving 5 to pick up a loaf of bread and 2L of milk. The Irish government is treating everyone like stupid children. Look at the ridiculous begrudgery they pulled at Easter, having road blocks to stop people traveling to their holiday homes. The road blocks were more of a potential virus vector than people driving to a holiday home and back and acting responsibly. The Swedish government are saying act responsibly and do what you want within that guidelines that doesn't involve a risk of either transmitting or getting the virus.
Pinch Flat wrote: » That's the key difference with Ireland. We still had muppets driving 100's of kilometers to collect trampolines, puppies, etc. Ireland is still a very socially immature state, and people can't be relied upon to do what is good for the common good and act as responsible citizens.
IAMAMORON wrote: » The reason why WHO are being cagey about Antibodies and immunity is that there is simply no way to test the entire global population, countries do not have the infrastructure to facilitate it. There are not enough test kits either. It is easier to say that it is not a definitive solution than to declare that it is and then have the problem of 8 billion people looking for an antibody test.
Breezin wrote: » responsible citizenship
Blut2 wrote: » @Wetasanotter you seem rather angry - and also appear to have completely misquoted me multiple times in that rather lengthy post to create strawmen for some reason. I'm sorry that you don't like the fact that Sweden now, officially has a lower death rate than Ireland - and has been proven more successful at fighting corona - but the statistics don't lie. You can get your citations for the death figures from multiple sources, they're all over google.
ush wrote: » Michael J Ryan of this parish discusses the Swedish strategyhttps://www.svt.se/nyheter/utrikes/who-om-sveriges-strategi-kan-vara-en-framtida-modell
jaykay74 wrote: » How many ICU beds are there in Sweden per 100,000 ? You had an opinion on it earlier in the week. Do you still hold that opinion ?
STB. wrote: » .
Ribs1234 wrote: » Without a vaccine, the number of virus deaths is the same IF the SAME number of people are exposed to the virus. At a reproductive rate of below 1, the virus eventually disappears. It is not an either or situation.
cnocbui wrote: » You don't seem to get the basics. Without a vaccine - which we can't afford to wait for, the number of virus related deaths will be the same, no matter what approach you take. Lock down delays the inevitable for the sake of the health services capacity, it doesn't prevent it. Sweden's nordic neighbours you seem so keen on, will see an increase in cases and deaths when they ease up on lock down, which we saw with Germany.
STB. wrote: » There's quite a few disciples of herd immunity on this thread. Now we are seeing it for what it is. Its been an unmitigated disaster. They have gambled with peoples lives and they have lost. Something the emotionally detached won't give two fúcks about, so I don't find it funny kiddo.
dubrov wrote: » It was a gamble either way. In the absence of a vaccine/cure, can you explain how the Irish approach has been superior to Sweden?
jaykay74 wrote: » I find it funny when people just won't back down when they make a mistake. There is no issue with saying, I quoted some out of date info, my bad. Anyway, deflect away asking random stuff instead of addressing info you put out there but won't take ownership of.
Breezin wrote: » For the love of Odin, are you being deliberately obtuse? How many times do you have to be told. Sweden has repeatedly said that its strategy is not premised on herd immunity. Some have said it might be a byproduct, but that it is not the strategy. ?
wakka12 wrote: » Their strategy doesnt seem all that defined. I think they are just one of the first countries to skip the denial phase and realise that much of the population do need to contract this virus because waiting for avaccine is simply not a possibility and also not a guarantee. All we can do is slow that process down enough to allow hospitals to manage
STB. wrote: » Whats your thoughts on Sweden's failed herd immunity approach? Other Nordic countries now opening up business with lower death rates.. The only thing we have in common with Sweden is our failure in tackling nursing homes.
Widdensushi wrote: » why England and Wales?
wakka12 wrote: » Perhaps, it is balanced out by naming every single death as COVID though. Not all of the deaths were from it even if they had it, somebody posted an article yesterday here and it said 15% of deaths in the UK who had covid were not killed by COVID but by one of the comorbities they had
Cuddlesworth wrote: » Super interesting, seems like if you took the official figures till the 17th of April both regions are about 3k deaths off average after removing Covid deaths. And while its across the board, its primarily in elderly people.