TheValeyard wrote: » What are your practical solutions so?
trapp wrote: » Smaller class sizes
trapp wrote: » Children come in one or two days a week to allow for reduced numbers
trapp wrote: » staggered starting and finishing times
trapp wrote: » staggered break times
trapp wrote: » constant reminders of hygeine
trapp wrote: » regular handwashing
trapp wrote: » Alternative shut up shop for a few years and the teachers join the dole queue and we raise an uneducated generation
trapp wrote: » Over to you my friend
TheValeyard wrote: » Possible, may need to hire many more teachers to teach the other kids, as teachers are already on contracted class contact hours. Probably will happen. Dept of Education would need to square this with bus companies who transport many children to school. Various times may not work. No need if you just operate a morning or afternoon school Teenagers and hygiene..... Once again, teenagers and hygiene That's never an option, and teachers are already teaching online, it could continue if needs be. Not a job for. Me, that's a job for senior management and high level public servants on 100K. Maybe they could finally earn their income.
trapp wrote: » Again another teacher putting obstacles in the way. And some laughable ones too, cant open schools because the teenagers wont wash their hands. Cant open schools because it wont suit the bus driver. Laughable attitude. Online teaching is fine short term but is not a solution for a few years. Most deis level schools are having little engagement in any case. Teenagers are taught maths aren't they? Spend a class or two teaching them how to wash their hands. Obstacles, obstacles and more obstacles instead of thinking of solutions. Of course schools should not open until safe but find ways of making them safer places.
trapp wrote: » Obstacles, obstacles and more obstacles instead of thinking of solutions. Of course schools should not open until safe but find ways of making them safer places.
trapp wrote: » Smaller class sizes Children come in one or two days a week to allow for reduced numbers staggered starting and finishing times staggered break times constant reminders of hygeine regular handwashing Alternative shut up shop for a few years and the teachers join the dole queue and we raise an uneducated generation Over to you my friend
trapp wrote: » Seem to be repeating the same thing in this thread all the time. This pandemic is here to stay in some form for the next year or two. Two choices for schools, open in some form or stay shut for two years. Presuming we want to open schools the group, including some teachers, that are constantly coming up with obstacles need to change their mindset. It's not about why we cant open schools but instead how we can open them. Instead of pointing out the reasons why not, instead think of ways to make the impossible become possible. Any teachers who can't come in or feel they can't can receive a reduced payment while they are waiting. And that previous line is not a dig at teachers its just the reality the country is in at the moment. Harsh as it sounds education for the children of the country can't just be put off for a few years because a teacher is vulnerable or at risk. These teachers might just have to wait until the virus danger is completely gone.
vid36 wrote: » I have another suggestion, preparing to alter the school calendar. Many leading experts predict a second wave of Covid in the autumn/winter. In preparation for the inevitable shutdown during this period, schools should open in early August this year and be prepared to run though the summer in 2021 if necessary.
kandr10 wrote: » That’s a good suggestion. How do you do it with appropriate social distancing , given some of the difficulties around this that have been brought up?
Long_Wave wrote: » There is no "social distancing" down the deli in spar or in the slaughter house but life goes on.
Alex86Eire wrote: » We have 700 kids with one bathroom for them containing 2 sinks. It'll be interesting..
Beasty wrote: » trapp - do not post in this thread again
Beasty wrote: » This threadban was never revoked. No need for anyone to respond further to trapp's posts as they are unable to post here
sideswipe wrote: » There isn’t going to be a perfect solution without an antiviral or vaccine. Schools are going to need to be provided with funds to put extra hand washing facilities in place. Perhaps the use of local halls/ sports facilities where available. This is going to take some outside the box thinking- simply saying teenagers are dirty so schools can’t open without a vaccine doesn’t wash.......pun intended.
KerryConnor wrote: » Is it pie in the sky to hope social distancing wont be required to same extent come September? I'm hoping that these stories that kids don't transmit much will mean social distancing wont be necessary...https://www.independent.ie/world-news/coronavirus/swiss-elderly-told-they-can-hug-children-who-are-under-10-as-theyre-not-spreaders-39166432.html Or perhaps there'll be readily available turnaround tests and kids can be tested regularly so can mingle in their class group once they're in school? I teach in a large boys school and we'll have to open up again however way we can. But it breaks my heart to think of social distancing little boys they are naturally so physical and tactile. I'd hate to be constantly reminding them and giving out.
khalessi wrote: » Ah it is just tragic, the 6th class have missed their confirmation, their last tour their graduation ceremony, the pizza day we throw them on their last day and they are chatting to me on skype about missing out on all of that and just being able to see and hug their friends. It is awful as they know they wont be in a class again with their friends and never got the chance to say goodbye. And for the other kids in the school just seeing their friends, their teachers social distancing would be hard to maintain, sure I feel like hugging them as they are so upset online about the whole thing.
Orchids wrote: » I wonder when the schools reopen will the classes finish out their current class or will they go straight to the next class up, which would mean the 6th classes go straight to secondary school without completing the last 3 months of primary?
wirelessdude01 wrote: » Everyone to move on in September. Too much added disruption otherwise.
sideswipe wrote: » Yes but what about second, third, forth wave etc we could easily end up missing chunks out of next year too. I wish there was away that all classes went back and started the class they were in. Incoming Jnr infants get an extra year pre school everyone else doesn’t lose out with further shutdowns or are not effected by perhaps having only a couple of school days a week. Taking one school year over two would take the pressure off a lot of people.