So realistically your child will be in school 6 days (at most) between then and the end of June. As you said the risk v reward is way too loaded on the risk side to make this in anyway the right thing to do. It will be also be of practically no benefit to your child's education.
JDD wrote: » I disagree with that. I think it would be of significant educational benefit. I am not a primary school teacher, and there's a good reason why you have to go to university for four years to become one. For something as simple as teaching my child how to write the cursive letter j there are a number of steps that have to be gone through. There's pencil control, there's a song, there's a letter formation rhyme, there's a direction the stroke on the page must go, there's making the letter out of playdough, there's practicing it on a whiteboard, and that's just a teeny tiny part of what they learn each week. There's only so much guidance that can be uploaded onto apps before both parent and child become overwhelmed. Even if the four hours in school provides them with some structure, some overview of what they need to practice that week, that would be of enormous benefit to them - and to me as their teacher for the foreseeable. 10 kids in a classroom one a day a week for four to six weeks is the absolute minimum we could ask schools to do, with the alternative being that we keep schools closed until September. I know that my kids would benefit enormously from those four days - even if it is only to wear their uniform, see some of their friends and do a small amount of work with their teacher.
Boggles wrote: » Like I said we have heard words like "hope" and "aspire" for the past 5-6 weeks. They are no where near the required level of testing or method of testing to open up any sustained gathering safely. Like he said last night, the more they open things up, the more the virus will spread, the more services will be stretched. So looking at where we are now (complete lockdown) and trying to apply to 4 weeks away is impossible. It will take 2-4 weeks to realize if any openings have gone "bad" as is.Opening up the likes of schools without the data or ability to test would be wreckless in the extreme. Get the systems setup, then talk about opening. False hope or off the cuff opinions leads to complacency, which leads to deaths.
Augeo wrote: » He also said he's hoping it will be further ramped up by May 05th.Opening schools won't happen in the initial easing, IMO.
Ray Donovan wrote: » In most Irish primary schools it is impossible to fit 10 students in the room and adhere to social distancing regualtions.
mloc123 wrote: » Most already are already in that boat... unlike teachers, who are on paid time off now for 6 weeks already.
JDD wrote: » I think we have to accept that social distancing with young kids simply won't happen.
wirelessdude01 wrote: » Glorified child minding if that is the plan they are going with.
PowerToWait wrote: » That’s exactly what it is. Not glorified either. Just get some exasperated parents on side for getting the kids out of the house for a few hours. Might as well send them to an early summer camp.
Scruff101 wrote: » Would it not be possible for schools to open in July/August? Why the focus on May/June? I get that July and August should be holiday time but these are unprecedented times. I'd feel more comfortable with that rather than rushing them back in May/June.
Birdy wrote: » No the plan seems to be a reopening on May 11th like France for 8 weeks. Each child doing 8 days of school and the rest of their work at home. Teachers will have Fridays for planning next year; reports/booklists/calendar/SEN/graduation etc. Have Communions been cancelled yet?
BanditLuke wrote: » I've spoken to several other parents today about this issue. None will be sending their kids back to school this side of September so I think Leo's kite will have to be brought back home if that's the general consensus across the nation.
uli84 wrote: » I’ve spoken to several parents and all will be sending if re-opened.
Deleted User wrote: » Even if their child is at risk? Which they will be in a school where social distancing can't realistically happen and shared toilets etc. That's sad.
Augeo wrote: » That's a very decent suggestion. However teachers have been working all during the lockdown. I can't imagine them working their holidays also.
Ray Donovan wrote: » Hilarious. This guy thinks just 6 days after the country was in total lockdown (as much as possible) that primary schools are going to open. Classic!
Scruff101 wrote: » I know several teachers none have been doing full days five days a week since the start of March. If secondary teachers can go back in July why not primary too.