PowerToWait wrote: » That’s exactly what it is. Not glorified either. Just get some exasperated parents on side for getting the kids out of the house for a few hours. Might as well send them to an early summer camp.
wirelessdude01 wrote: » Glorified child minding if that is the plan they are going with.
JDD wrote: » I think we have to accept that social distancing with young kids simply won't happen.
mloc123 wrote: » Most already are already in that boat... unlike teachers, who are on paid time off now for 6 weeks already.
Ray Donovan wrote: » In most Irish primary schools it is impossible to fit 10 students in the room and adhere to social distancing regualtions.
Boggles wrote: » Like I said we have heard words like "hope" and "aspire" for the past 5-6 weeks. They are no where near the required level of testing or method of testing to open up any sustained gathering safely. Like he said last night, the more they open things up, the more the virus will spread, the more services will be stretched. So looking at where we are now (complete lockdown) and trying to apply to 4 weeks away is impossible. It will take 2-4 weeks to realize if any openings have gone "bad" as is.Opening up the likes of schools without the data or ability to test would be wreckless in the extreme. Get the systems setup, then talk about opening. False hope or off the cuff opinions leads to complacency, which leads to deaths.
Augeo wrote: » He also said he's hoping it will be further ramped up by May 05th.Opening schools won't happen in the initial easing, IMO.
JDD wrote: » I disagree with that. I think it would be of significant educational benefit. I am not a primary school teacher, and there's a good reason why you have to go to university for four years to become one. For something as simple as teaching my child how to write the cursive letter j there are a number of steps that have to be gone through. There's pencil control, there's a song, there's a letter formation rhyme, there's a direction the stroke on the page must go, there's making the letter out of playdough, there's practicing it on a whiteboard, and that's just a teeny tiny part of what they learn each week. There's only so much guidance that can be uploaded onto apps before both parent and child become overwhelmed. Even if the four hours in school provides them with some structure, some overview of what they need to practice that week, that would be of enormous benefit to them - and to me as their teacher for the foreseeable. 10 kids in a classroom one a day a week for four to six weeks is the absolute minimum we could ask schools to do, with the alternative being that we keep schools closed until September. I know that my kids would benefit enormously from those four days - even if it is only to wear their uniform, see some of their friends and do a small amount of work with their teacher.
So realistically your child will be in school 6 days (at most) between then and the end of June. As you said the risk v reward is way too loaded on the risk side to make this in anyway the right thing to do. It will be also be of practically no benefit to your child's education.
jrosen wrote: » Maybe it would be best to close the schools now, (end of april?)allow the teachers and staff and departments to work out and plan how they can come back in September. Teachers can spend the remainder of the 2020 school year planning out their lessons, working though kinks in the systems, working with distant learning and also classroom. Allow the teachers to work behind the scenes so come September we can have some sort of return to school where everyone knows what is expected, what the expectations are. We also need to know what teachers cant and wont return to the classroom. Realistically there could be a decent % of teachers who wont be able to return for health reasons. Right now we are getting a thrown together attempt ay distance learning. There are some schools doing well and others not, some kids engaged some not.
Deleted User wrote: » I think schools should just remain closed until September. High risk vs low reward bringing them back now. Social distancing is never going to work in schools anyways. What we really need is to ensure the elders cocoon themselves.
Augeo wrote: » He also said he's hoping it will be further ramped up by May 05th. Opening schools won't happen in the initial easing, IMO.
Boggles wrote: » Testing capacity has been moved into care homes. We do not have the capacity to rapidly test in the community, which is a requirement of opening things like schools up. That is not my opinion, that is what the leader of country stated last night.
JDD wrote: » I completely understand anyone who might want to keep their children out of school until September - that is completely their prerogative and different families will have different risk appetites for this infection.
Augeo wrote: » I'm similar with my Dad, might chance a trip to the gate as you suggest when long spins are permitted. Although as someone based in the East I'm not sure how socially acceptable trips around the country will be.
Ray Donovan wrote: » Ya they are on full pay. Because they are working remotely.
CinemaGuy45 wrote: » Nonsense the lockdown was about slowing spread not stopping it. People will need to go back to work and children will need to be back in school. Teachers are on full pay at the moment they need to just get on with it. This lockdown has come at an enormous cost we can not wait forever.
[Deleted User] wrote: » Yes agreed. As they have played a long game and schools were first to close I am fairly sure they will be amongst last back and therefore September. They would be a breeding ground for Covid. No social distancing can happen in schools with young children so it would be using our children and their families as an experiment.
Augeo wrote: » Testing has now ramped up, no more tests sent to Germany.
SusanC10 wrote: » We have decided not to send our daughter back before the Summer. We have been fairly self-isolated here. My husband is working from home and I am a stay-at-home Mum. Our son is in Secondary in a non-exam year. My priority is that we will all be able to see my elderly Mum who we have not seen since mid-Term in February as soon as the rules allow with a clear conscience that all of us have taken as many precautions as possible not to infect her. For me that does not include sending our daughter to school in June as an experiment. Not everyone will agree with us and we will have to make other decisions nearer to September.