castletownman wrote: » No kids, but missing the fact that my working life is the tourism industry during the week and reporting on live sporting events at the weekend, both of which are fooked for the foreseeable. So actually, the ability to have a pint would at least take the edge off things.
BanditLuke wrote: » No, deaths are the only true indicator of how we are doing. A ramping up of enforcement is needed countrywide but especially in the Dublin region.
Cork Boy 53 wrote: » Not just restrictions for the most vulnerable groups. A repeat of what is in place now the only difference being stricter enforcement of the rules.
Idbatterim wrote: » yes the fact that they are hyper conservative here, was good on this front, its going forward, that is going to be the issue! The "ah shure its grand" approach :rolleyes:
BanditLuke wrote: » Shocking numbers today. As I said last week the lacklustre attitudes of some and absense of enforcement of the soft lockdown is going to cost us all big time. Still no wearing of masks whilst outside not compulsory is a farce. Chances of withdrawal of restrictions over the first 2 weeks of May is now very unlikely.
Cork Boy 53 wrote: » If there is a second wave of the virus next autumn/winter as is quite likely to be the case and no vaccine or treatment has been developed by then that is what will happen.
stephenjmcd wrote: » You do realise some of these deaths notified today occurred as far back as the first week in April ? It's not 77 from the last few days. It was said and shown in the charts during the press conference
Hana Teeny Snob wrote: » People just won't tolerate another lockdown, there would be public anarchy. And I say that as someone who has been in lockdown since the day the schools closed and who follows the guidelines strictly. We cannot afford another go at this, not financially/economically and not mentally either.
drunkmonkey wrote: » Is the donkey derby happening this year?
completedit wrote: » What do we do? What's our best exit strategy? We are just going to seem inhumane now given that we all decided en mass this was the best way forward, now the situation will be the exact same but the morality of it has changed because, why? Sweden's approach and UK's earlier approach was better because it was honest and consistent.
Icyseanfitz wrote: » Sure if that's the case we might as well stop taking numbers for anything virus related, who knows wether today's numbers are from last month or the future
Idbatterim wrote: » is it? listen if its just about saving lives, resume things here and use the billions in savings v the current draconian lockdown to save collossal numbers of starving africans...
hmmm wrote: » The Germans are reporting their estimate of R0 is now 0.9, after falling to 0.7 There is very little scope to relax restrictions
tobefrank321 wrote: » We should have the hospital capacity for 50-60 age group. But if someone has a known underlying condition, we should continue to pay them the covid19 welfare payment of 350 a week to stay at home. Its about minimising the risk, you aren't going to eliminate it, just minimise it over the long term - cocooning will have to remain, as will social distancing. Also masks on public transport should be obligatory as they appear to be in Spain.
stephenjmcd wrote: » Where did you see this 0.9 ?
Idbatterim wrote: » That government, Harris, Varadkar, the lot of them, they are despised by many here, have ZERO credibility and have the authority of the boy scouts! I honestly cant see their plan , which is basically no plan,to be tolerated here for much longer , like I said, given how disliked they are, based on their pathetic governance and lack of action, these last few years!
jmayo wrote: » For all those claiming that this only affects especially the old and the compromised, just think about the hundred odd NHS and care workers that have died from this in the UK. 27 NHS workers have been offically confirmed by government. Some of them are not that old. And it is now believed that the viral dose that one is exposed to has huge effect on how bad one gets it. If we had wholesale infections then we have drastic increase in numbers needing medical attention, and increased numbers needing ICU treatment. That then increases the possible exposure of our healthcare professionals and staff. Ultimately it means the nice little 0.4% that is often trotted out by some posters here jumps by an order of magnitude. Here is pic of some NHS/heathcare staff that have died in UK. Just imagine it being one of your relatives that work in HSE here. And most of us have a relative or friend working in healthcare somewhere.
khalessi wrote: » Lets look at other nations. Denmark coopted other buildings for education use, has split clsses to about 6 kids, hand washing 2 hourly etc. DO you see it being done here. All I am saying is I hope so, a safe environment for everyone
BanditLuke wrote: » I've no idea what you are trying to imply. I'm comparing nations not cities and nations.
lord quackinton wrote: » My lockdown ended when I read the news about keelings - so should yours