Charles Babbage wrote: » Remembering that there are still plenty of 50+ people in employment.
Sierra Oscar wrote: » Seems to be a lot more people out and about in Dublin today compared to the last couple of weeks.
easypazz wrote: » Leo Varadkar said the Government was keen to reopen schools in the early phases of easing restrictions, but as the plan to do this had not been completed he did not want to speculate. Not great news really for the doom merchants on here.
easypazz wrote: » The weather is too good. Why would people not spend time outdoors? The only measure left is to ban exercise, otherwise people will continue walking around outside, in what is now a vast open prison.
tobefrank321 wrote: » Re-opening schools would be foolish. Its not an industry where tens of thousands have lost jobs or gone on the dole. It would actually be a stupid move to re-open schools but not pubs. A rural pub in a locality with next to no cases, eg Leitrim, the risk of catching covid19 would be 1 in a million. But a busy school in the middle of Dublin? It goes up massively.
lord quackinton wrote: » https://www.rte.ie/news/business/2020/0420/1132624-pandemic-unemployment-payments/ How is this not the headline news This is going to cost billions In the short term at least 5 billion When the 350 reverts to 200 and hoping we get the numbers down to half million over time an extra 5 billion per year on welfare minimum Forget new schools new roads housing and health projects Our economy just traveled back in time 35 years For those who don’t remember that time - say your prayers because things are about to get very real very fast
Gael23 wrote: » Do people think a decision regarding what happens on May5th has already been made?
Spencer Brown wrote: » Ah yes sure kid's educations and mental health doesn't matter!
tobefrank321 wrote: » If you want a very rapid spread of covid 19 particularly in urban areas, go ahead and re-open schools.
pjohnson wrote: » Schoolchildren would be a lot smarter than some of the gobshìtes you'd find staggering about in pubs.
is_that_so wrote: » How can it spread if it's not there?
tobefrank321 wrote: » If you want a very rapid spread of covid 19 particularly in urban areas, go ahead and re-open schools. Just about the number 1 way to achieve it.
Spencer Brown wrote: » Somebody better tell the experts that tobefrank from the interweb disagrees with their plan.
tobefrank321 wrote: » I am some time for experts, although even they can be wrong. Varadkar and Harries are not virologists.
FVP3 wrote: » It's never going to be killed off. If that happened there would be a once off flu season and that would be it, the virus would die off, and that would be the end of it. In fact the flu season ends when the numbers drop but they keep circulating in a low background fashion and then, with the start of winter, as people stay indoors, they accelerate again.
is_that_so wrote: » I wouldn't make any pronouncements on something we've only known about for 5 months. It hasn't even completed one cycle.
FVP3 wrote: » I just did. Its a virus and therefore is going to transmit like a virus. If you are suggesting it will be totally destroyed you should look at how hard that is to do, see SmallPox etc.
KrustyUCC wrote: » Goes to show they had no plan bar extend the restrictions for three weeks after Easter
ixoy wrote: » I imagine they'll look to how Germany and others are faring with their easing of lockdowns. And I am quite okay with that approach.