ush wrote: » No point, if the assumptions are faulty or based on emotion.
coastwatch wrote: » Good news for Stockholm, Sweden and everywhere else if it turns out to be truehttps://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8233783/Sweden-herd-immunity-month-claims-infectious-diseases-chief.html
charlie14 wrote: » If you scroll down that worldometer site to updates those are not the figures given for deaths. On the 18th. rather than 9 deaths it lists 111 new deaths. !7th rather than 23 it lists 67, 16th 130 rather than 61 etc.
sydthebeat wrote: » the source is actually the same .. the FHM from the same source charlie:upload photo album looks like it is very well under control in sweden.
charlie14 wrote: » Ah, an avoiding the questions asked thing.
charlie14 wrote: » Worldometer.info/coronavirus/country/sweden/ Lists the daily confirmed cases and deaths with a link to source.
Att vara en hest wrote: » https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-04-19/sweden-says-controversial-covid-19-strategy-is-proving-effective So while there is no legal changes in place, people have changed their behavior anyways.
ush wrote: » Ah, its an opinion and feeling thing.
Att vara en hest wrote: » Peaked and plateued :-) Don't know where you're seieng the numbers you are mentioning? I don't see it in the same data, are you looking at avlidna/dag? edit: raw data from FHM here - https://www.arcgis.com/sharing/rest/content/items/b5e7488e117749c19881cce45db13f7e/data
charlie14 wrote: » as far as I am concerned
Att vara en hest wrote: » The statement that Sweden's deaths/day peaked on the 8th of April is based on real data from FHM (department of public health).. You can find their data right here:https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/09f821667ce64bf7be6f9f87457ed9aa What you're looking for is "avlidna/dag". This is, as far as I'm aware, the only source which accounts for WHEN a death happened. Other sources being linked in this thread over and over again only account for when deaths were reported, which gives an inaccurate image due to Sweden's delay in reporting deaths, especially over weekends. Obviously it's less sensational than other sources as it paints a much milder picture than what other people here seem to want.. Maybe that's why we keep seeing other sources posted? Note also the age of people dying. You can see highest number of deaths so far occurred on Apr 8th (102)... Note however that due to the delay in reporting, there's always a sharp dropoff at the end which will later be adjusted.
And while many other countries have introduced strict laws, including hefty fines if people are caught breaching newly minted social-distancing laws, Swedes appear to be following such guidelines without the need for legislation. Trips from Stockholm to Gotland -- a popular vacation destination -- dropped by 96% over the Easter weekend, according to data from the country’s largest mobile operator, Telia Company. And online service Citymapper’s statistics indicate an almost 75% drop in mobility in the capital.
charlie14 wrote: » Herd immunity is a misnomer. In reality in human terms it would be more accurately named herd culling. Lets not fool ourselves here and call a spade a spade. It is a system that will kill of the least productive and those that are a burden to a states finances.
ush wrote: » Really? Nothing. They're doing nothing? You don't know what you're talking about. Everyone I know has been given notice by their employers, is working a fraction of what they did previously and pensioners are, for the most part, indoors.
JoChervil wrote: » I explained clearly what I meant. No one can predict, how this virus will behave in the future.
charlie14 wrote: » I wasn`t actually. Another poster had commentated that he/she believed Sweden had hit it`s daily peak of deaths from the virus on April 8th.
ush wrote: » Seasonal doesn't mean what you think it means.
charlie14 wrote: » But that is my point, they are not doing anything to prevent the spread.
JoChervil wrote: » Yes, but it is an unknown virus, so it can be seasonal. In this case you can kick the can in a safe place. What if it will die off for the summer to return in the autumn? So kicking the can to the summer makes sense and is less risky. And it gives time to prepare better for the later wave. Swedish solution will only work, if the virus will stay in the world for good. But what if it will die after a season or two? Is this worth sacrificing so many people?
average_runner wrote: » Nope, have test results in 24 hrs and can contain it more then. Just keep pubs and nightclubs shut till we do have a vaccine. Social distancing every where else
ush wrote: » Thats what they're doing. Its gonna spread sooner or later. If you lockdown entirely then you've only kicked the can down the road. When you open up again, you're back to square one.
average_runner wrote: » Herd immunity could be a total myth. No proof it works at the moment
jibber5000 wrote: » That's what we did here. Nurses have been upskilled in ICU work over the past 2 months. To say people would just be left to die if/when Sweden reaches its official ICU capacity is wrong. And yes I do work in a hospital.
ush wrote: » Is testing about individuals or seeing where the disease is spreading in a country? Statistical tests can show you the patterns.