HBC08 wrote: » "Those who die,will die" It absolutely sickens my hole that I have to share this country with people like you. This is an exceptionally hard time for everyone. My father was diagnosed with cancer at the start of March.My partner had a miscarriage a week later,we're both in our 40s and have no kids,that was our last chance. I work as a carer with an lovely autistic lad whos routine is so disrupted by this that he is in constant meltdown,i work 24 hr shifts with him. Everyone is enduring hardship at the moment and loads have it a lot worse than me. Show some ****ing resilience for the greater good of your fellow Irish men and women.
road_high wrote: » Plenty from what i can see. Maybe not deliberately but their "lockdown foreva" rhetoric amounts to the same thing.
Deleted User wrote: » Has anyone seen the video of the street party that went on in a Dublin suburb recently? Not sure if it was legit or not but disgraceful behaviour if it was.
Cork Boy 53 wrote: » Which is why you need these issues to be answered before making a decision. Under the new regulations distancing measures have to put in place. Otherwise it`s not safe to be at work IMO.
easypazz wrote: » This is why the lockdown must be unwound through May, its tough and its cruel but those who die, will die. It could be any one of us or members of our families. Otherwise the long term consequences are grim for us all anyway. Keep some measures as required to keep the ICU beds under control, but we have to face up to reality here.
BanditLuke wrote: » Not essential work im afraid. Unless your employer can provide you with a letter stating such to produce to the Gardai at any roadblocks i'd thread carefully.
CoronaBlocker wrote: » I have no idea about sanitizer being there or not but in what we do, social distancing is virtually impossible. Everyone is always right on each others' shoulders. I'm really not comfortable to be honest. Weeks hunkered down at home and then this out of the blue this morning. Feels like it's just undermining everything going on.
Galwayguy35 wrote: » The New Zealend approach seems to have worked, they closed their borders (we didn't ) and this combined with social distancing etc has got the numbers down to levels where they are looking into easing some of the ristrictions.
Ace2007 wrote: » But that all very vague There are bars, restaurats and coffee shops open these days - the owners have thought outside the box, and got them open. So to say come June they will open in some capacity - is stating the obvious when they already are working at some capacity. You about about Harris saying xyz but fail to mention that he also said there would have to be a reduction in new cases/deaths before restrictions lifted - which you fail to comprehend.
iamwhoiam wrote: » But its not .
CoronaBlocker wrote: » This really is why I posed the question. It's the ethics vs economics question that I have yet to really see answered effectively. And now it's been left squarely on my doorstep. My health* vs my work. *and everyone else's too.
Ace2007 wrote: » If the morality/morbidity rate was high for kids, i wonder would Hearty have the same out look - lets get the kids back in school and see what happens... I feel like their outlook would be very different.
Mic 1972 wrote: » now, that is stupidwho in their right mind want o cripple their own economy? you seem to deny there is a pandemic at the moment, people have health concerns about themselves and their families stay at home and relax
road_high wrote: » Perhaps not but some people are pragmatic in a business sense and realise if they don't get back to some work there won't be any work or business left to go back to ever. This rigid union type mindset displayed in this post won't pay the bills.
Mic 1972 wrote: » now, that is stupid who in their right mind want o cripple their own economy? you seem to deny there is a pandemic at the moment, people have health concerns about themselves and their families stay at home and relax
Hearty80 wrote: » My ass, people who want to cripple our economy..... Selfish and stupid
stephenjmcd wrote: » Theres alot of other things to take into account though as well. The employer has to have social distancing measures in place, hand sanitizer etc
Cork Boy 53 wrote: » I`m not sure what you mean by covid related jobs. Anyway, if as you state yourself, you are employed in a non-essential service I don`t see how you can be obliged to go back to work tomorrow. Will there be distancing measures put in place, hand sanitizers, masks etc. provided? What about canteen regulations assuming there is one in your workplace? These are issues that need answering before making a decision on whether to go back or not.
oceanman wrote: » these type of loans never get paid back, we simply just pay the interest on the the loan, and if we lock in the low interest rate we have at the moment its nearly free money.
CoronaBlocker wrote: » Ok, that's good information, thank you.
CoronaBlocker wrote: » I appreciate your view, thank you. I think I will do that to at least cover myself.
Cork Boy 53 wrote: » I`m not sure what you mean by covid related jobs. Anyway, if as you state yourself, you are employed in a non- essential service I don`t see how you can be obliged to go back to work tomorrow. Will there be distancing measures put in place, hand sanitizers, masks etc. provided? What about canteen regulations assuming there is one in your workplace? These are issues that need answering before making a decision on whether to go back or not.
easypazz wrote: » They will open a lot on May 5th, then by middle of June hair salons, bars, restaurants, coffee shops etc. will open in some capacity and €350 will be snip snip snip.
BanditLuke wrote: » You are working in a non essential industry. Now unless the company is producing leaflets, billboards etc..for the HSE that's another story. Nobody here can make a decision for you but if i was wearing your shoes i'd be contacting my employer for a letter.