The examples the company cited include "promoting a phony miracle cure for a serious illness, claiming the earth is flat, or making blatantly false claims about historic events like 9/11."
King Mob wrote: » . The Nazis killed 6 million Jewish people during the holocaust.
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » You do believe all six million perished during the holocaust.
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » I can't argue with someone who takes a position that no jews died in 8 years and 2 plus years of war.
Urethral Buttercup wrote: » Six million /two million, tomayto / tomato we'll never know.
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » I not debating this subject anymore when (dohnjoe and kingmob they) refuse to listen other people's point of view about this.
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » Gerald Reitlinger Provided his numbers and was 4.1+ million and said at the most 4.4+
Dohnjoe wrote: » It's nothing to do with people's views here, it's historical fact. You're trying to revise that in order to diminish the number of Jews dead during the Holocaust - which is disturbing behaviour You don't dare do this on history forums. You have zero genuine interest in the subject. You parrot Holocaust denial arguments endlessly. You claimed only 2.5 million were killed, and as that bull**** was exposed, you revised the figures upwards. It's one of the more ****ed up hobbies I've witnessed. And yes, you will be back with your denial, I guarantee it
nullzero wrote: » Cheerful spring is hardly influencing popular opinion one person on a forum with an opinion isn't so disturbing that you'd dedicate an entire week to arguing with them. Your own hobby is hardly normal either, seriously the behavior displayed here is bizarre. You're demanding facts and evidence from other users and when you're challenged to do the same you can't comply. Your opinions differ, you're unlikely to convince each other of anything and yet here you are three days later still having the same argument. The mind boggles. My only conclusion is that you lot actually love each other and would have nothing to do without these arguments
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » Not historical fact. Gerald Reitlinger knew the reported number back then and was six million. It not like he thought was 4 millon and stuck to the number.
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » Not historical fact.
Gerald Reitlinger knew the reported number back then and was six million. It not like he thought was 4 millon and stuck to the number.
nullzero wrote: » Cheerful spring is hardly influencing popular opinion one person on a forum
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » nullzero my main problem with their argument they don't understand Reiltiger had the six million number in his head from the beginning. It was reported number in 1947 6 million died. He found no evidence for 6 million killed during the holocaust.
Dohnjoe wrote: » Never mentioned that.
nullzero wrote: » Never gave me the evidence I asked you for either. Swings and roundabouts I suppose.
Dohnjoe wrote: » Depends, Holocaust denier? no prob, you'll even create an "out card" for them, it's just an "opinion you disagree with" Come across another opinion you disagree with, you're like a dog with a bone who can't let it go. Interesting. Maybe I am completely wrong but I think that speaks for itself in the thread And are we way off topic here? of course we are, but every thread in this forum is typically a dumpster fire
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » Again Gerald Reitiliger said was 4 million.[//quote]
Dohnjoe wrote: » Reitlinger estimated 4.2 to 4.5 million in 1953. Yet you deliberately keep (deliberately) misrepresenting even his lowest estimate. Why would you do that?
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » 4,194 was, not 4,.2.
During the 1950s he wrote two books about the Holocaust: The SS: Alibi of a Nation and The Final Solution, both of which achieved large sales. In the latter book, he alleged that Soviet claims of the Auschwitz death toll being 4 million were "ridiculous", and he suggested an alternative figure of 800,000 to 900,000 dead; about 4.2 to 4.5 million was his estimate for the total number of Jewish deaths in the Holocaust.[2] Subsequent scholarship has generally increased Reitlinger's conservative figures for death tolls, though his book was still described in 1979 as being "widely regarded as a definitive account".[3]
Dohnjoe wrote: » Yes but you are resorting to being pedantic. 4.2 million is his lower estimate. You wrote 4 million. Normally I'd assume it was a mistake, but you've consistently done it through the thread.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerald_Reitlinger The only reason I can think that you are so fixated with Reitlinger is because he's the historian with the lowest figures. And to you, he's become infallible, because you are clearly obsessed with downplaying the figures of Jewish deaths only All of this is further bolstered by the fact that you downplay even Reitlinger's figures in this thread, multiple times.
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » I never trusted the six million figure. I pointed it out to you why in this thread.
Dohnjoe wrote: » You trust all the other figures. You've admitted you've never read a book on the Holocaust, so why are you so interested in Jewish Holocaust history, specifically revising it, the death figures, downwards? Where does all this come from?
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » Dohnjoe will come along now and claim the two million was found later. It just sillyness anyone could misplace two million people.
nullzero wrote: » IHowever as you and King Mob have been largely influential in making it a dumpster fire (...)
(...) Seriously what the hell do you get out of posting on these topics?
Dohnjoe wrote: » No idea what you are talking about. l
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w8.vanillicon.com/v2/867a9f20e705add43a3ada2e4f4480cc.svg)
