alwald wrote: » as you are the only suggesting that the expected death rate is 21%.
thebaz wrote: » no, just calling out scaremongering statistics such as 21% , when most studies expect a death rate well below 1% - we will know next month who is right, once anti-body results are assessed to see how widespread virus is in population. all the reading between the lines and baby steps is making me dizzy.
Cupatae wrote: » Are you deliberately trying to misunderstand what his saying to you or are you incapable of reading between the lines?
Speakerboxx wrote: » I see social distancing and stay at home was live and well in Dublin Airport yesterday with Keelings bringing in 190 fruit pickers from Bulgaria. That is nothing but a disgrace when our country is in lock down. Time to boycott Keelings products me thinks
hmmm wrote: » This has not been proven. Most kids get a very minor illness. The research on whether they are also significant sources of spread has not been completed. There are huge costs to society having kids out of school/childcare - we need to make decisions based on facts.
BanditLuke wrote: » All efforts should now concentrate on safely reopening schools in September if at all possible. Can't see it myself at present as we are presently living in a country that has no temperture checks at supermarkets/random on the street, doesn't enforce the wearing of masks in public, allows jogging on footpaths, gatherings in parks etc.. so i don't think we have the organisational capacity to pull it off for September. The "reopen in May" brigade really need to stop doing it to themselves.
alwald wrote: » I was talking to a 5 years old who understood the difference between the death rate of closed cases and expected death rate and yet some don't understand it here.
niallo27 wrote: » Even the most pessimistic miserable misery loving people dont expect a death rate of 10% but yet we have a few posters here quoting even up to 21%. I'd say you lot are one bundle of joy to be around.
BanditLuke wrote: » ......... The "reopen in May" brigade really need to stop doing it to themselves.
Paddygreen wrote: » Kids and teens should be kept indoors.
hmmm wrote: » ............. The research on whether they are also significant sources of spread has not been completed. There are huge costs to society having kids out of school/childcare - we need to make decisions based on facts.
lainey_d_123 wrote: » Kids/teens are major spreaders of the virus
pjohnson wrote: » If any of them have underlying conditions they wont be allowed return to those jobs if we needlessly rush things.
easypazz wrote: » And there will be no jobs to return to if we don't start to move on soon.
dundalkfc10 wrote: » What about the many teenagers in my area who work in supermarkets, shops, in hospitals etc Sure make them all stay at home
shocksy wrote: » Just because you want it to happen doesn't mean it will work out for you. Anyone with an ounce of common sense knows that the school year for this year is finished. They're not gonna rush children back into school for a lousy few weeks just because you or anyone else are fed up of your kids being at home. They were one of the first to be closed and they'll be one of the last to reopen. It doesn't matter a f*ck what Denmark and the likes are doing. Time will tell how it works out for them. I'd be much happier keeping them closed than gambling with such an idea. The Scandinavian countries are doing their own things, they aren't even showing unity on their decisions so anything they decide to do I'd take with a pinch of salt. Let them gamble for the rest of us. I'll happily await your "you were right" reply when the schools don't reopen for this term.
Idbatterim wrote: » lockdown merchants, should I be worried about the sky falling in any time soon?
lainey_d_123 wrote: » Have to agree. It would be insanity to open up the schools before at least September. Kids/teens are major spreaders of the virus and sure we're nearly into May now anyway. No point undoing all this hard work for the sake of a few weeks. Feel very sad for those who won't be able to sit exams and whatnot but this one is a no brainer.
niallo27 wrote: » I'm not assuming most serious cases had underlying conditions, it's a fact. If they haven't been cocooning then natural selection will play its course.