Yurt! wrote: » Only someone gainsaying in the death sting of losing of an argument would characterize a national affordable housing project as a classically right wing position. All over the map and patently bamboozled. EDIT: Apologies, didn't see the mod note asking me not to post in the thread again.
[Deleted User] wrote: » I know you can't reply on this thread, so I'll keep general but privatisation is a right wing position. Giving away state assets at low cost (or in this case for free) is verging on neo-liberalism. No amount of spinning from any SF supporter can change that. It's like SF's support for austerity in NI, or opposing property taxes here. They are a fake left-wing party.
christy c wrote: » Am I missing something here? What is the link?
Bishop of hope wrote: » You could delete it! There will be fcuk all houses built by anyone for the state now until this covid chap and paying for it is put to bed.
walshb wrote: » No link I am just curious as to their views on this.... The thread is about them having vanished......
Hoboo wrote: » Curious as to their views on Trump making childish threats he can't deliver, simply to deflect attention from the ****show he's making? Why would they? Have you not noticed the volume of similar comments? I think Simon Coveney should have kept his mouth shut too instead of biting, now is not the time to throw the little weight he has around,. especially at childish comments by Trump.
walshb wrote: » SF are barking on about how they are the biggest party, the party people want to see in power..... Trump's WHO funding cut is global news during a global pandemic that affects so so many...... Yes, I'd like to hear SFs views on this, seeing as they are the party who polled so well. Coveney and others are well within their rights to react and comment on the WHO funding cut....they are politicians, for chrissake, of course they should make their views known.
McMurphy wrote: » Who else has commented on it from Irish politics? Did FF make any statement on it? Did the other Simon make his views known on it? You know the Simon in health? Been looking online don't see anything from shinners in general about it, and I for sure ain't going through each and every one of their TDs social media platforms to check.
blanch152 wrote: » Apart from some whinging, you would struggle to find anything of note being said by Sinn Fein at the moment. The funniest was Louise O'Reilly complaining about uncosted programmes for government. It was like she hadn't realised that the world has changed with Covid-19.
walshb wrote: » Relax. I am just wondering if they made a statement on it.... FG did..... Global news that affects so many people......just thought Ireland's "biggest" party may have given a view.
maccored wrote: » lets be honest - shinners are ****ing delighted with ff and fg going in together. well, I know I am. about time FF/FG realised they were the same party
walshb wrote: » Have SF made any comments on Trump's WHO cut to funding?
Amarach, the polling company that does the Claire Byrne Live poll have sent out questions to 1000 people for next week's show. Just please, please read the first 4 loaded questions. 1) Thinking back on all that has happened since do you wish you had voted differently in the February General Election? 2) Fianna Fail and Fine Gael seem to be the only parties making any real effort to form a Govt: should other parties play their part? 3) So much has changed since the Election. Do we really need another election? 4) Everything has changed since the Election.. Do we need parties which can work together to form a cohesive Govt? And we think America is bad with Fox News!!!!
piplip87 wrote: » If anybody who is struggling to pass time during lockdown, I cannot recommend the Facebook Group "Friends that Vote Sinn Fein" enough. It's everything you would expect in such a group. 1)Homophobic comments thrown at the Taoiseach 2) Conspiracy theories about COVID19 3) Calls to stop recognising the state and just build a dictatorship around MaryLou 4) Calls to riot and take to the streets 5) We voted for change brigade is everywhere I do hope whoever leads the next government invests in education and a expanded Civics program and it seems many many SF supporters don't have the slightest clue how our system of governance works. Here is the pick of the bunch.....
McMurphy wrote: » Well that didn't answer the question I didn't ask you.
McMurphy wrote: » Who else has commented on it from Irish politics? Did FF make any statement on it? Did the other Simon make his views known on it? You know the Simon in health?Been looking online don't see anything from shinners in general about it, and I for sure ain't going through each and every one of their TDs social media platforms to check.
Fionn1952 wrote: » While pages like that referenced above are often the lowest common denominator of internet political discussion, filled with numpties who don't have the first clue what they're talking about, I don't think it's entirely unreasonable to point out that 2nd polling question is loaded as hell and wouldn't pass muster on any reasonably scientific public sentiment survey. I'm not sure what the point of pointing that post out as, 'the pick of the bunch' is when you say the page is full of homophobic nonsense. I usually notice these types of pages are full of anti-EU rhetoric, almost exclusively posted by people who don't understand how the EU works, economic policy suggestions from people who don't understand basic economics.....and the worst you can point out is that someone is picking out some loaded questions from a survey for our state broadcaster?!
Bishop of hope wrote: » Doesent matter your opinion or the educational or non educational qualifications of the political bolox, he/she gets to have an opinion and a vote. The vote of the I'll informed and uneducated and educated bolox is what elects the politician (who in most cases are self serving egotists) who happen to think they aren't boloxs, when in fact they are often the biggest boloxs of all.
Mortelaro wrote: » It's a parameters paper,nothing else It is not a costed programme for government and isn't meant to be Those come laterI'd expect the greens will climb on board if their 7% pa emissions reduction target is agreed subject to it not harming sectors of the economy I'd expect labour will stay out as will the soc dems because the SF blocking parties as part of their plan will want them to soak up the next protest vote I'd not be surprised if labour and soc Dems merged during the 5 year opposition term
Mortelaro wrote: » I'm not betting on the greens, I'm expecting
Mortelaro wrote: » I think the Greens if given what they want don't care about future elections as much They look for opportunities
Recreating the traditional divide between government and opposition just now runs the risk of bringing division on how we deliver the many other emergency measures that will be needed. In ordinary times such divisions are the sign of a good democracy but these are not ordinary times. We have seen in recent weeks the public administrative system having to present sweeping measures, in timelines which scarcely allow for effective legislative scrutiny. More urgent decisions are going to be needed in the coming months and it makes sense in such circumstances to have a range of parties directly involved in the policymaking process. The national government would bring together the best people from across the Dáil and involve all parties in the collective proposition of solutions to get us out of an inevitable economic downturn. We are suggesting cabinet ministries be allocated on a proportionate basis and it would be up to the parties to agree quickly in advance who takes on which portfolios. This cannot take long but it is the biggest obstacle to making a national government happen.