KrustyUCC wrote: » Maybe or maybe not I know that local politicians are getting plenty of mail about the restrictions In a large part the restrictions were so the HSE wouldn't be overwhelmed I think they are doing as designed However they are also designed to be temporary The longer they go on the more unpopular they will become, the more non Covid related health issues will occur It's a balancing act The HSE and the government will already have got 22 more additional days and 54 days total of restrictions from the Irish population Saying we're doing well, flattening the curve, but not where we need to be won't work long term as people will need to see friends, family, relations, those in relationships not living together etc
easypazz wrote: » Politicians will play along for a while, but you can be sure at this stage the discussion all about the format of the reopening which will be rolled out through May.
Ace2007 wrote: » So you think if we have on average 25+ deaths a day till the end of April, that everything will start to slowly reopen? Regardless of how busy hospitals/ICU beds are?
easypazz wrote: » If things are not improving by then it is clear the strategy is not working so they would need a big rethink. Based on other countries we should be seeing a marked improvement by then. It will also depend on the nature of the deaths, if its an ongoing nursing home issue and largely contained there, locking us all down won't make much difference.
easypazz wrote: » Tighter enforcement wouldn't make much difference here. We live on a small island, we don't have huge cities or thousands of people / trucks / migrants etc. travelling through our country to get between 2 other countries.
GazzaL wrote: » You can definitely see people are easing up on restrictions whilst still social distancing and washing their hands, lots more people visiting family and friends and returning to work. Good to see people doing this in a sensible manner.
Cupatae wrote: » By we do you mean ireland? our economy doesnt matter a bollock if the big dogs like the US go down. So whether we lock down or not we get the decade you fear so much regardless. Id wonder, if it was a devastating virus that had a high kill rate on young people would we have such a clamor for no restrictions and the "Let it take its course save our money first" ideology
AdamD wrote: » This is stupid. Of course it matters, the US economy going down would hurt ours. So would locking our own economy down. You realise there are different levels of hurt right? Doing both hurts us more than just the US having issues. Its not difficult to comprehend this stuff
NDWC wrote: » Who's returning to work??
GazzaL wrote: » All sorts m8, there's not much you can't get these days.
BanditLuke wrote: » Like a Ryanair flight :pac:
BanditLuke wrote: » You can't be sure.
Annabella1 wrote: » ..... Gonna be a delicate balance
Dickie10 wrote: » pubs will open but they wont have to worry about social distancing as it will happen naturally. there will be small crowds in pubs even if they do open. prob cap numbers coming in the doors.
Augeo wrote: » There will undoubtedly be some easing of restrictions in early May, unless ICU space is at capacity. The hope is they'll be able to test 15,000 people per day & have the results within 48 hrs by then. I imagine there'll be no pubs open unless they go all seated with clear 2m distancing being facilitated or something along those lines. Festivals, gigs & sporting events.... Not a hope for 2020. Lots of folk seem to be getting increasingly anxious as the severity of this is hitting home.... Initially there was an element of (in some quarters) its only hotel staff & barstaff etc being effected etc so, so be it. But as the widespread implications are being seen folk are getting quite unsettled.
El_Duderino 09 wrote: » They may loosen some restrictions to bring transmissions back up to meet ICU capacity, but I’d expect it to be temporary.
khalessi wrote: » Why bring transmissions up the aim is to stay below and not overwhelm