Widdensushi wrote: » nothing is going to change before the end of 2020
anything that happens after May 5 will be conditional on what we see in the behaviour of the virus
sydthebeat wrote: » No one said that. Why are you trying to move the goal posts? Answer what I asked and prove your claim.
[Deleted User] wrote: » Did you not read the previous post with the link to the quote in the Indo?
sydthebeat wrote: » Again.... This time answer the question "who" has said that we will be in lockdown for the rest of 2020 Name and quote the person !!! If you cannot, then do not post this crap again
[Deleted User] wrote: » Alright then show me a public figure here who has definitively said we'll be open for business in June or July. Name and quote.
sydthebeat wrote: » No one.....
Ireland is likely to remain in virtual lockdown for much of 2020 to fight the coronavirus, it has been starkly warned.
Deleted User wrote: » We are going to have the same number of deaths as them, just stretched out over a much longer period. And we'll have a lot more deaths on top due to the destruction of our economy. Now they are saying we need to stay in lockdown for all of 2020. This just isn't realistic or viable.
Two KTH Royal Institute of Technology professors have decided to post serological self-test kits to 1,000 random addresses in a bid to ascertain what percentage of metropolitan Stockholm’s 2.3 million inhabitants have gained immunity to the coronavirus.
Gary kk wrote: » Who said we have to stay in lockdown until the end of the year
[Deleted User] wrote: » We are going to have the same number of deaths as them, just stretched out over a much longer period. And we'll have a lot more deaths on top due to the destruction of our economy. Now they are saying we need to stay in lockdown for all of 2020. This just isn't realistic or viable.
KiKi III wrote: » They have twice our population but almost four times as many deaths as us so far.
ILoveYourVibes wrote: » Our govt is doing the same thing. They refuse to add the german no of positive tests of irish people to the daily tally.
ILoveYourVibes wrote: » They are testing. They are even sending people self test kits to see if it works.
ILoveYourVibes wrote: » Sweden has 10k cases a population of 10 million and 900 deaths. We have a populations of 6 million 10k cases and about 365 deaths Their health system was ruled by the global health security index to be one of the most prepared countries for a pandemic though. They ranked 7th overall.
STB. wrote: » They are ONLY testing people with severe respiratory symptoms or who belong to a risk group. This was introduced on 22 March. They are leaving community infection and contact tracing alone. IE Not doing it unless you fall into one of those two categories above. They are pursuing a herd immunity approach! That's why their death rate is 8% whilst Denmark's is 4% and Norway's 2% (who enforced restrictions before their first death) So to go back to what you said which was "Swedens whole approach is testing."
ILoveYourVibes wrote: » They have not been doing feck all. They have almost twice the population we do and they got their first case the same time as us but have roughly the same amount of cases as we do.
duffman13 wrote: » They've not updated there figures for 3 days, their own PM said they've made mistakes that need to be addressed and their death rate is twice ours most likely cause they aren't testing so skewing the mortality rate.
STB. wrote: » You don't test out unproven concepts live on your population. Herd Immunity (or Just do nothing as its more widely known) is not a vaccine. There are reinfection/reactivated virus cases now in South Korea. Immunity is not a given. Sweden have the same ICU capacity we have. The UK started off with this nonsense and they are in serious trouble with stupid assumptions that coronavirus behaves like the flu. Sweden will soon change their tune when the ICU's become overwhelmed. Sweden's problem is testing. They have been doing feck all! Why do you think their death rate is 8% of cases ?
Danzy wrote: » Problem with herd immunity is that this disease puts so many in hospital that the medical system collapses quickly. So is it even possible without seeing a mass casualty event.
STB. wrote: » And, Sweden are doing feck all testing.
Bit cynical wrote: » I don't think there's much of a problem with the concept of herd immunity. Most people who get the disease develop antibodies and some sort of immunity. If the number with immunity gets above a certain level, then R0 number falls below 1 and eventually dies out since their aren't enough hosts to infect. The problem is that as a strategy on its own without other measures it leads to the medical services being overrun. Hence most countries have some sort of social distancing, restrictions or lockdown to try to "flatten the curve". Sweden has some of these too but leans towards a light touch relying more on the commonsense of its population to do this flattening. The risk Sweden is taking is that this reliance on the population may not be enough and their services will not be able to cope. The benefit, however, is that they will reach herd immunity before other countries maintaining stricter lockdown and with much less damage to the Swedish economy. Our strategy here, with our much stricter measures, also contains risks. We can't afford to maintain lockdown for the much longer period it takes to develop herd immunity so we are dependent on vaccines being developed soon or at least anti-viral drugs which will keep people out of hospital and allow some sort of normality for the rest. I've got a feeling that a drug will be approved in a couple of months but really we have no idea when that will be and certainly vaccines are a long way off.
ILoveYourVibes wrote: » Swedens whole approach is testing.