Cupatae wrote: » You completely missed the first part can you work through that aswell.
Cupatae wrote: » Wonder how many of em will be tested and put in isolation, and ill decide whats my business not you.
Plumbthedepths wrote: » Honestly I don't think you're worth any further effort tbh.
alwald wrote: » Ha you are certainly not worth the effort either...back to my delicious beers!!
Thelonious Monk wrote: » What's your poison tonight? This solitary confinement is turning me into a dipso ffs
alwald wrote: » Speak your mind son and keep it objective for the sake of a good discussion!!
Thelonious Monk wrote: » This whole subject as my brain fried at this stage and I'm running out of thoughts on the matter. Also I've had about 6 beers at this stage, I should call it a night, take it easy folks :pac:
Thelonious Monk wrote: » The Match of the Day the BBC put together and the program after it with the Keane V Viera tunnel battle was pretty good. These restrictions are going to have a huge impact on football. I wonder if older players like Ronaldo will play again... or Glenn Whelan?
Jenbach110 wrote: » Watchd that, f### me Ronaldo was a just past teenage years and I remember that game so well. Anyway interesting point, I really hope confidence can be restored to life as it was, and as soon as possible. Life as we know it will return, this virus will be forgotten
BoatMad wrote: » I’m not sure the world be ever be the same again.
alwald wrote: » If a vaccine/cure is found then yes...otherwise it will be a country by country or continent by continent situation...really hard to say at this stage.
BoatMad wrote: » Lots of ifs ....
_Kaiser_ wrote: » Ultimately, in order to keep countries, economies and societies functioning it will come down to a line from the original Star Trek movies. "the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few" People need to work and interact. Not just for economic reasons but for mental health, social reasons and others. The vast majority of these people will (thankfully) not suffer any lasting effects if they do contract this virus. They need to be allowed back to work from the 5th April, if not before. The current restrictions will ultimately solve nothing long term insofar as prevention or cure. All it's doing is protecting the health service which is a legitimate reason, but again needs to be weighed against the longer term impact of locking people in for weeks and (if some here had their way) months. Those who are at risk will need to maintain the current restrictions for their own safety. They should continue to be supported in every way possible to facilitate their being able to do this. But the rest of us need to get back at it, before there's very little to get back to.
Cupatae wrote: » Yeah didnt think you d have the guts to say it out, when gettin called on it. Stick to snide remarks.
Plumbthedepths wrote: » Feel free to post any snide remarks I have made.
alwald wrote: » Well I am glad that governments across the world are not relying on movie lines to make decisions that can influence lives and deaths...the rest is irrelevant.
Plumbthedepths wrote: » Cool retort if I was actually responding to you. Enjoy your beer.
Atlantic Dawn wrote: » The simple fact is the country won't be able to afford to keep to the current health system with the lockdown in 6 months time, August weekend things will be relaxed no matter what happens between now and then.
alwald wrote: » Well you couldn't/wouldn't dig deep into you comments earlier hence my reply. I am enjoying my beers! Thanks!
Plumbthedepths wrote: » It won't go till August, the populace won't tolerate a lock down of that duration.
