Penfailed wrote: » It's quite simple. There aren't enough masks for everyone.
Idbatterim wrote: » what I find hilarious is, when the cost of what is currently doing, has to be paid for, all of the "shut it all down merchants" will be screaming blue murder, when the welfare cuts and tax increaseas and big living standard adjustment come along! They cant see the few minutes down the road... Trump was saying that this shut down, is costing other lives and costing a fortune, both true. I am not saying lets go back to normal tomorrow, but strike a middle ground, the actualy cost of what they are doing is ridiculous, this isnt some social experiment, its peoples lives. Many of those making the decisions probably go back to their nice big spacious houses and gardens. Jesus I can only imagine some of the awful situations, hundreds of thousands are in, because of this and I am not talking because of employment...
OMM 0000 wrote: » And the even bigger divide between the rich and the poor results in greater social unrest, more extreme politicians getting elected, and then we're in trouble. Barely anyone is thinking things through.
Plumbthedepths wrote: » If you think things through and respond in kind you are accused of wanting to see everyone dead.
OMM 0000 wrote: » Black and white thinking is all the rage these days. Why use nuance when you can jump to extremes and get outraged?
KiKi III wrote: » Hardware and gardening shops are going to be open on Tuesday. Legally they were allowed to open this weekend but the government asked them to stay closed to avoid a bank holiday spike. It was reported in the Indo.
alwald wrote: » The dilemma between the impact on the economy versus the human life is simple for me. You can revive an economy, one way or another, especially now that the entire world is in the same mess, but you can't revive a dead person and you only get to live once.
Plumbthedepths wrote: » You will also loose alot of people due to a destroyed economy. The two are not mutually exclusive.
Discodog wrote: » yes but whilst you are reviving the economy you make cuts in services which can also kill people. One reason we are in a mess is because of previous health cuts.
Sam Hain wrote: » The word is not "loose".
alwald wrote: » I don't follow you here. Can you elaborate please? I disagree with this statement, while cuts might happen and they remain to be seen, previous cuts are not the reason we are in this mess. All countries around the world are in this mess regardless of how much they spent/cut from their health system. No-one planned for such unforeseen events.
Plumbthedepths wrote: » You don't understand that you need a functioning economy to support people and provide services?
alwald wrote: » That's what you think I don't understand...lose a lot of people, how so? People are being supported and the EU is coming up with solutions so what don't you understand in all of this??
Discodog wrote: » Really ? I know people that have been lobbying for this & I didn't see it. Gardeners are desperate to get back & there is no reason why they shouldn't as they can easily distance. So they can legally open but are advised not to - that's helpful
Plumbthedepths wrote: » Ah yes the EU reaction.https://edition.cnn.com/2020/04/10/europe/eu-bungled-coronavirus-response-analysis-intl/index.html
alwald wrote: » Right, there are articles claiming the opposite...you still didn't explain the "lose people part".
Plumbthedepths wrote: » I have no intention of explaining something so obvious. Maybe employ some thinking on your own behalf prehaps.
Plumbthedepths wrote: » Feel free to counter the link I provided with some contradictory articles if you wish.
[Deleted User] wrote: » But you wouldn’t have as many dead people if you revived the economy while keeping elderly and vulnerable people cocooned (and maintaining some element of social distancing and avoiding opening mass gathering places such as pubs). The ICU cases should then be within the capacity to deal It isn’t one or the other. It’s the middle ground that our leases will attempt to start to find come May
KiKi III wrote: » Everything I’ve heard so far suggests governments are planning to go down the route of printing money/ spending our way out of this one as opposed to austerity.
alwald wrote: » You should seriously document yourself on this virus to answer your own questions. Ask yourself this, why should our medical staff put their lives in danger, as well as their families, just so that you can go to a DIY shop and travel around the country as you please? They can also be selfish and give up their duties altogether.
Discodog wrote: » Borrowed money still has to be paid back. We aren't being given money. Every €350 paid out will have to be paid back, one way or another.