_Kaiser_ wrote: » So 3 more weeks. I've been at this since the week before paddy's day and I have no symptoms, can work from home and have managed shopping etc just fine. But I'm not at home and leaving my own place empty for another few weeks is a concern. I am thinking of getting work to adjust the address on the cover letter they issued to all staff and go and check on things soon. I can remote onto my plex server and all is working so I haven't been robbed - yet - but the chances increase the longer this goes on I reckon. Of course, if I go there's the chance of not getting back which would be a problem too. Extremely frustrating considering the actual risk involved in the return trip is zero
Ace2007 wrote: » Ok I will do a very simple example, . 14, 14, 16, 80, 94, 98, 100 the median above is 80 the median below is 80 77,78,79, 80, 94, 98,100 The median age doesn't change you see for teenagers dying
Tell me how wrote: » I can think of at least 2 older people every young person has quite a strong connection with. Possibly 4 for many. Not to mention the compassion and empathy they have for other members of society aside from just being directly connected with them.
Plumbthedepths wrote: » Better tell the Australian government that's their plan to get back to 'normal' that's it fairytale stuff so. Won't be a second lockdown, the vulnerable will be expected to cocoon, young people won't accept putting their lives on indefinite hold for older people they have no connection with.
Tandey wrote: » Primary school teachers most certainly are off.
FloatingVoter wrote: » I get you. I corrected the OP. I think the point all three of us are proving is we have no idea how young the people can be. It would be helpful for the idiots tossing bangers across the road from me right now. If they knew that teenagers are not immune. Your first range would terrify them. The second would result in "Meh".
Plumbthedepths wrote: » I asked you four times yesterday to refrain from commenting to me can you please respect my request.
Cupatae wrote: » Dont speak for all young people, because i certainly would put up with more lockdown if it meant saving people at risk, and id be fairly certain most people i know would do the same, i dunno what breed of people you know.. Lets see how it goes for them before preaching that it will work 100%, as of right now "immunity stickers" are a fairytale.
Cork Boy 53 wrote: » Can you just not put this particular poster on ignore?
Ace2007 wrote: » Got a link to that?
Phoebas wrote: » They're on the scheduled Easter break right now, along with their students, but otherwise they are working from home the same as many of the rest of us. I'm all in favour of a bit of teacher bashing, buts let's have a little bit of a basis for it.
Plumbthedepths wrote: » Not where I read it I believe it was in the Times but can't find that link. Here is what I found instead.https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/coronavirus/controversial-idea-to-give-immunity-passports-to-australians-who-have-recovered-from-coronavirus-making-them-exempt-from-tough-social-distancing-laws/ar-BB12oHCv?li=AAaeSy5
While the Australian Government isn't actively pursuing the idea, some health experts have thrown their support behind it.
Tandey wrote: » What work are all of the primary school teachers doing at home and what is your source? Kids that I know that are in primary schools haven’t had any correspondence from their teachers since they were forced to stay at home. Thats a basis. I’m not teacher bashing I’m giving factual information.
Ace2007 wrote: » So from reading that article, it's not the Australian government that is supporting the idea, instead it's some health experts.... doesn't exactly show you in good light - you read one thing, and they a completely different meaning and then post in online.
KaneToad wrote: » Not the average age. See my post above.
BrianD3 wrote: » I'm in a similar situation. Haven't been robbed as far as I'm aware but who knows what's happening. Grass not cut at all this year either. The only risk associated with me checking on my property would be if my car broke down en route and I had to interact with a tow truck driver. There is a clause in the regs that allows you to travel if you have a "reasonable excuse" (this is separate to defined essential travel) but it is not clear what a reasonable excuse would be. And not much point asking in this forum given the number of unreasonable people here.
Plumbthedepths wrote: » 'breed of people'? There are no spearate breed or species of people just those that have a different outlook on life to you.
helimachoptor wrote: » I've a girl in junior infants, she gets worked emailed each week and other stuff arts/crafts etc maybe every second week
Plumbthedepths wrote: » So you are happy with one group of health experts ( Irish) but not with another( Australian). Do you think I care whether you perceive me in a good light or not. We are not required to submit our comments for peer review before we post here . Feel free to search outside this site for claims you see made .
Ace2007 wrote: » I was merely pointing out that you said the Australian government were doing something, with no back up - and then posted a link that showed that the Australian government weren't actually doing it.
polesheep wrote: » What about the June bank holiday? The August bank holiday? The October bank holiday?
Cupatae wrote: » Yeah i dont think highly of people that would put elderly people at risk and not care simply because they have no connection with em...i dont think this is what this country is about and i think the vast majority would do there best even if it meant more lockdown. You come across as very pretentious to me honestly and all about yourself, Alot of the stuff you are preaching as fact has already been shown by other posters as nonsense. Asking for people not to comment on the stuff you post then...
jimbobaloobob wrote: » Are all those kids in the one school? I know quite a few teachers who are in correspondence with their classes and providing some good home activities for primary level. Every school is different I suppose
KrustyUCC wrote: » Love how George Lee is discounting the original restrictions as if that time didn't count