KrustyUCC wrote: » Another 21 days of restrictions Apparently they are working on a plan Not convincing in that regard
thebaz wrote: » This lockdown is primaily been extended to benefit the over 70's , since it is the elderly who are most at risk - what are you suggesting let the elderly carry on as normal , while the less at risk majority are forced to endure a lockdown and economic misery , and let casualty count soar - seriously
VinLieger wrote: » And one of the few outlets people have left would be gone, your pious, ivory tower arrogance is disgusting
AdamD wrote: » So there has to be a full reasoning behind delaying this (hospital capacity presumably) but they haven't given the public any information on targets or how that would be measured.
YFlyer wrote: » Was there any change in shopping restrictions?
Tenzor07 wrote: » Were't those Antibody tests supposed to be ineffective?https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/05/coronavirus-testing-kits-could-be-unreliable-uk-scientists-say
nj27 wrote: » What could be the downside to announcing the continuation of the current restrictions for another 2 weeks, followed by a review? Even if they know it's going to be continued again it would soften the blow and possibly help with compliance. I intend to keep sticking with the restrictions as I have been, but I'd be lying if there wasn't a part of me that said to hell with it.
Micky 32 wrote: » Both my parents are in their 70’s. Both have heart conditions. Even so they are as fit and as active as me. But if this lockdown was lifted i know it would wipe them out that simple. That’s the type of carnage we could be faced with.
AdamD wrote: » Yeah if the june bank holiday is brought up as a reason for the next delay.. The government filled me with no confidence whatsoever there. What is the actual plan? Delay? Eradicate? Varadkar said there's a worry if they lift it too soon the virus will spread again. Sorry, the virus will spread again no matter when they lift this. So there has to be a full reasoning behind delaying this (hospital capacity presumably) but they haven't given the public any information on targets or how that would be measured.
facehugger99 wrote: » They have none. They are terrified about being branded as murderers by social-media morons - avoiding this seems to be the extent of the 'plan'. They are more concerned with their own political reputations than by actually leading and making tough decisions - there will be a price to be paid for all this..
AdamD wrote: » What is the actual plan?
Sean 18 wrote: » 5th of may announcement will be till after the June bank holiday then after June the August bank holiday
Blueshoe wrote: » Wuhan is back in business
Logan Roy wrote: » Wouldn’t an antibody test that enabled me to “wear an immune badge of honour” not just incentivize people to get infected ASAP lol.
Blueshoe wrote: » Not a hope of it. Wuhan is back in business and other some European countries are starting to loosen restrictions. 3 short weeks will pass and the position will be reassessed with a likely loosening of the restrictions. By the looks of it some people were struggling after 2 weeks so hopefully they can continue to hold firm for another 3.
Penfailed wrote: » Yeah...but it's been going on there since December (maybe earlier). It's now April. Do you expect 3 months of lockdown/restrictions?
Sean 18 wrote: » But the problem is when the lockdown is over foreign travel could start it all up again
BanditLuke wrote: » Absolutely and it more than likely will be needed if people don't follow instructions.
thebaz wrote: » The anti-body testing system will be available in US in 2 weeks , should be a reliable one which it needs to be , given issues with Chinese PPE do not think I would rely on ther anti-body test - needs to be very accurate as , they will be used initially by healthcare workers, giveng them a green light to work with infected patients.
Cork Boy 53 wrote: » The European countries that are loosening their restrictions may very soon tighten up on them again if there is a large spike in deaths and ICU admissions.