KiKi III wrote: » Food shop = 1 queue Offy = 1 queue 1 + 1 = 2 Buy your food and drink together = 1 queue total
FixdePitchmark wrote: » There is no queue - there are less people and less time. It is risk science - not rocket.
KiKi III wrote: » The people who are queuing in the offy are also queuing in the supermarket. I’m sugggesting they put a few bottles of wine or beer into their trolley and queue once in one location instead of twice in two locations. It’s not rocket science.
MOH wrote: » So you want to take the people who are queueing and shopping for alcohol in off licenses, and the people who are queuing and shopping for food and other necessities in supermarkets, and merge the two so they're all now queuing and shopping in the same place? Yeah, that sound like a genius way to reduce transmission
glasso wrote: » I believe that this data is very important in terms of phase II and relaxation of restrictionshttps://reason.com/2020/04/09/preliminary-german-study-shows-a-covid-19-infection-fatality-rate-of-about-0-4-percent/ the population of Gangelt is about 11,000. please note that antibody testing is testing after the fact, not for case numbers. the infection fatality rate directly correlates to the infection ICU rate and the infection hospitalisation rate. if they are much lower than previously thought/ assumed then this could (and arguably should) influence the phase II plan the measures have been directly linked to health service capacity and if that the situation is not as bad as thought in that regard that will be influenced. of course having an accurate on-site (no lab) test and technology assisted contact tracing will be very important also.
KiKi III wrote: » You’re not smart enough to figure out a user called Kiki with a female avatar isn’t a he so I’ll be leaving you to it too.
KiKi III wrote: » You can also get booze in most small local Centras? You’re proving my point more than your own. Offy not necessary.
ThewhiteJesus wrote: » Great craic here by the canal in rathmines, plenty boozing and even a dude playing guitar, happy days
brickysession wrote: » Last week, I saw it gradually getting busier and busier and I thought about ringing the station and letting them know they might want to send someone down. It wasn’t the Stasi level stuff people on here are envisioning.
KiKi III wrote: » If this is the level of discussion you’re capable of, I’ll leave you to it. Have a good afternoon.
Poor_old_gill wrote: » Well if it’s more than one then he’s got a chronic eating disorder and his obesity & probable diabetes are an affront to and a drain on the rest of us
FixdePitchmark wrote: » Were you on the way to the shops again ?
KiKi III wrote: » I haven’t answered because it’s irrelevant? And none of your business? What difference does it make to this discussion?
FixdePitchmark wrote: » How many shopping trips are you doing a week. Your refusal to answer makes me concerned ?
KiKi III wrote: » Well, in the end I decided not to call them at all. But to answer your question, no I certainly wouldn’t call the Gardai for that. I’m talking about an area where - in better times - when the weather gets good people come to hang out. There are usually a few skateboarders, maybe someone with a guitar, and lots of international people because there’s a language school nearby. It’s usually a really good atmosphere, almost like a festival on a really good day. On those days there would often be a couple of Gardai patrolling and I’ve often thought “this area is a real handy number for a Garda to patrol” because there’s rarely any hassle. Last week, I saw it gradually getting busier and busier and I thought about ringing the station and letting them know they might want to send someone down. It wasn’t the Stasi level stuff people on here are envisioning.
brickysession wrote: » Just out of curiosity, if you see a 2 or more adults walking in close proximity will you call the Garda Station also?
Deleted User wrote: » We are living in unprecedented times, why some people can't or won't follow simple guidelines is mildly frustrating. Unfortunately there is no cure for stupid.
KiKi III wrote: » Well, we’re in agreement then for the most part. Having said that, if you see someone breaking the window of a car or house to get into it, it’s always possible he is the rightful owner and simply forgot his keys and has no other way in - you’d probably report it though if, on balance, you thought it was a thief.
KrustyUCC wrote: » It's a licencing issue If you shut off licences you have to close the drink aisle in supermarkets
KiKi III wrote: » Yeah, I think essential should mean essential and I wouldn’t include off licenses in this. Very easy to pick up your beers and a paper at the supermarket.
normanoffside wrote: » But someone might take a picture and with lack of a focus and distance judgement it might look like we are less than 1 metre apart. Most people couldn't tell what 2 metres is anyway.
normanoffside wrote: » But you don't really know if people are breaking the 'rules' or not. You don't know if the little group in the park is a household, you are just assuming they are not. I'm all for reporting obvious breaches (e.g. House parties) but any pictures i have seen on Social media of people in parks (and subsequent outrage in comments) I haven't actually been able to spot any clear breaches. This culture of 'window phantoms' and 'keyhole Kates' spying on what other people are doing and working themselves into a tizzy about it is not a good thing.