FloatingVoter wrote: » Those civil servants are manning the jammed phonelines regarding welfare payments and risking their lives for your coffee break.
lastusername wrote: » How did you make it through those two?! I was saying above we're talking about in our time
ITman88 wrote: » Very hard to know, judging by some of the posters suggestions on here, he could be senior hurling by the time we are out of the police state
ITman88 wrote: » Ah FFS Kiki I’m after spitting out my coffee with that statement
Plumbthedepths wrote: » Nope, Black death , Spanish Flu just to name two previous pandemic outbreaks.
Nermal wrote: » Christ. Someone take him aside and tell him that in two weeks, we'll be exactly like we are now but €1.7B poorer. Here's the UK doing what we cannot - directly financing government expenditure:https://www.ft.com/content/664c575b-0f54-44e5-ab78-2fd30ef213cb
JMNolan wrote: » I lived through the AIDS pandemic.
lastusername wrote: » It's already an unprecedented health issue...!
lastusername wrote: » It is - when in our time was there a highly contagious disease (that can affect the young just as much as the elderly) floating around with no vaccine and no cure?
ITman88 wrote: » Not it’s not an unprecedented health issue. It’s an unprecedented response
road_high wrote: » The lockdown Fetishists will be delighted- another business down the drain. Soon there won’t be much left to go to bar supermarkets and nothing to spendhttps://www.businesspost.ie/companies/debenhams-to-put-its-irish-arm-into-liquidation-49b98491
JMNolan wrote: » Without making any comment about the relaxation of restrictions, I'm pretty sure this pandemic is not unprecedented
hawkwing wrote: » This is an unprecedented global pandemic.
seamus wrote: » The data already tentatively suggests that the number of daily cases is dropping, but we're still a couple of days away from knowing if it's a proper trend or a lull.
lastusername wrote: » Would be nice if we could, but it's overly ambitious I reckon. It's going to be another month at least I'd say, or until we see the number of daily new infections going down...
ITman88 wrote: » You need to stop reading tabloids and listening to the fairies, it’s not that bad. We won’t see many deaths restrictions or not, the numbers of vulnerable simply aren’t there to see any unprecedented health issue
ITman88 wrote: » It can be done. We just have to many people justifying the holiday at present. Where there’s a will there is a way
Amia Thundering Engineer wrote: » Not a hope that it will be extended that long in my opinion. Two more weeks tops of current restrictions and then months of other lesser restrictions...
niallo27 wrote: » Honestly I dont see any team sports this year. Maybe football in the winter, buy I'd say no summer sports.
Plumbthedepths wrote: » I'll take the time to respond to you once more. Firstly I have used the phrase lock down fetishist once and my only reference to those that seem to enjoy same. My situation is quite benign actually rural house on an acre of land 1O miles from nearest town. So getting out for a run/walk twice a day no issue. Few neighbours some distance from me. Still working and will be eventhough I'm on a week's leave next week. My work is essential. I don't presume to tell others how they should feel or use asinine comments like 'suck it up'. As I said dislike a comment scroll on by, a tactic I use with the majority of yours. Now it's a discussion forum people are entitled to voice their thoughts if you have issues with that maybe a different outlet would suit better. Feel free to reply but I will however be using my already explained tactic of scrolling.
Cork Boy 53 wrote: » Surely supervision would be an issue if this was to be implemented.
arctictree wrote: » My young lad, who is sport mad is being driven crazy due to lack of matches and training. Anyone have a rough idea when team sports will be back up again? (Football, Hurling, Soccer etc....)