Ulysses Gaze wrote: » It won't. It can't in modern offices unless you tell half your workforce to work from home. It will mean restricting international travel for business meetings. It will mean long term pub closures because if you really believe publicans are going to limit the number of patrons to 20 or 30 inside in any major Irish town...just ****ing lol. Shops and shopping malls? How will you enforce it then?
[Deleted User] wrote: » Like 61 dead in last 2 days,give it until we have gone 3 or 4 days with no deaths/icu admissions,before even dreaming re-openin.everywhere Several ICUs full and overflowing into seperate areas....and people think its wise to reopen everywhere We borrowed 6 billion over 7 years yesterday at .242%......its never been cheaper to keep country closed down
polesheep wrote: » You do realise that the money you mentioned will be gone and will have to be paid back?
timmy_mallet wrote: » Here we go again, explain how "it will get smaller and smaller"
Deleted User wrote: » Like 61 dead in last 2 days,give it until we have gone 3 or 4 days with no deaths/icu admissions,before even dreaming re-openin.everywhere Several ICUs full and overflowing into seperate areas....and people think its wise to reopen everywhere We borrowed 6 billion over 7 years yesterday at .242%......its never been cheaper to keep country closed down
ITman88 wrote: » Well the alternative is to cocoon everyone!!! Fanny around? I’m talking about the healthy going back to work. Try get some of the 850k to work. And how are they paying the bills now? Do you think we have implemented restrictions to completely eradicate Covid 19? We haven’t, it’s here to stay, and that demographic is at risk until a vaccine
KiKi III wrote: » Health experts have been explaining this for weeks. When the virus got here, everyone who got it was interacting with 20 people on average which meant it spread very rapidly. Now, that average has gone down to three. So it's the difference between 20 people spreading it 20 people who each spread it on to 20 more people (20 x 20 x 20 x 20...) and (3 x 3 x 3 x 3). Do you see how the numbers get much smaller through social distancing now? Here's a visual and an article that explains it further: https://www.itv.com/news/2020-03-21/coronavirus-why-social-distancing-works/ Hard to believe you've been on here all week without even having this basic level of understanding of the attempt to slow the virus.
citysights wrote: » Some people think there’s a magic money tree to pay for everything. Small businesses will go under, already huge loss of jobs, homehelp support being taken away, will there even be money to pay for basic services and welfare, pensions etc if this goes on. Oh yeah there’s that magic money tree .. Not
timmy_mallet wrote: » Ahhh, explaining social distancing. so you're advocating social distancing for ever, I see.
ITman88 wrote: » I wouldn’t mind the social distance thing of 2m. I could go about my business and life that life.Life at the minute is spending every spare minute arguing with anonymous strangers online[/QUOTE] Then do something else?
KiKi III wrote: » I don't understand. He asked what "short-term" means, and I said "weeks" rather than months or years.
KiKi III wrote: » ITman88 wrote: » I wouldn’t mind the social distance thing of 2m. I could go about my business and life that life.Life at the minute is spending every spare minute arguing with anonymous strangers online[/QUOTE] Then do something else? Like what? Did you not hear about some flu thing up the country? We can do nothin
ITman88 wrote: » Like what? Did you not hear about some flu thing up the country? We can do nothin
KiKi III wrote: » Read a book. Do some yoga. Call a friend. Mix yourself a tasty beverage. Masturbate. Watch your favourite movie. Watch a new movie. Do an online exercise class.
ITman88 wrote: » Some economist goon on the radio earlier also said it’s a depression coming not a recession, I turned off the radio then!!!
never_mind wrote: » Word of warning: doing all of these at the same time is very difficult.
KiKi III wrote: » No, and I didn't say that. Try and keep up. It's not a case of "keep them forever" or "lift them all by the end of the month" and those are the only two options. There's a lot of middleground between those positions and that's where the answer will lie.
Deleted User wrote: » Yes?? Im aware of how this works.
pjohnson wrote: » Speak for yourself :pac:
Logan Roy wrote: » You were saying there a lot so I was wondering where you meant.
niallo27 wrote: » You do realise that would probably mean a full lockdown for 6 to 9 months before we see no more icu admissions. How will the normal joe pay his mortgage in 9 months. Can normal people do this for 9 months.
timmy_mallet wrote: » What's the middle ground for you and your parents?