ITman88 wrote: » 48 deaths in Australia in a month???
Dank Janniels wrote: » 36 people died today! How can any1 even think about lifting restrictions??
Idbatterim wrote: » what has that got to do with what I posted?! and no, I am not...
Idbatterim wrote: » 'People have to get sick': New plan to expose young, healthy Australians to coronavirus by easing social distancing restrictions 'at a gentle pace' in a bid to boost immunity Social distancing rules could be loosened to expose Australians to COVID-19 COVID-19 infections continue to drop across the country following strict rules Controlled exposure to virus could allow society to return to normal fasterhttps://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8196229/Coronavirus-plan-expose-young-healthy-Australians-boost-immunity.html interesting article, copied and pasted a very interesting bit, go to article to see graphs etc... What does the coronavirus modelling show?If no measures are taken The theoretical modelling finds an uncontrolled COVID-19 pandemic scenario would overwhelm our health system for many weeks. 89 per cent of people would catch the virus, with 38 per cent requiring some medical care. ICUs would be stretched well beyond capacity for a prolonged period. Only 15 per cent of people requiring ICU beds would be able to access one, even with the expanded ICU capacity in the model. This graph shows three scenarios based on no restrictions (grey), quarantine (light blue) and social distancing (dark blue) +8 This graph shows three scenarios based on no restrictions (grey), quarantine (light blue) and social distancing (dark blue)With quarantine and isolation Quarantine and isolation would reduce the proportion of people who would catch the virus to 68 per cent, and those needing medical care to 29 per cent. Only an estimated 30 per cent of people requiring ICU beds would be able to access them.With social distancing restrictions If social distancing measures reduces transmission by 25 per cent, the proportion of people infected would be 38 per cent with 16 per cent requiring some medical care. Eighty per cent of people who need ICU beds could access them. With a 33 per cent reduction in transmission due to social distancing, the proportion of people infected is 12 per cent and only five per cent require some medical care. In that scenario, everyone who needs an ICU bed over the course of the pandemic could access one. The modelling finds our ICUs will cope if we continue to have effective social distancing, increase our health system capacity, and isolate people with the virus and their close contacts.
tdf7187 wrote: » The restrictions are already causing disproportionate hardship and should be relaxed if not entirely removed. Sweden has none and is doing fine. But hey it's great for the coppers and their overtime so celebrate.
Deleted User wrote: » In relation to mild cases of covid-19, there's now a concern that such cases don't result in immunity.https://amp.scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3078840/coronavirus-low-antibody-levels-raise-questions-about?__twitter_impression=true
[Deleted User] wrote: » Well, the countries that haven't followed international guidance tend to end up the worst hit. Eg the UK and US. A few days we also had people praising the Swedish policy, a hundred people died there yesterday. So Australia's strategy is one that's likely to go seriously wrong
road_high wrote: » Thought yesterday evening was a particularly low point in morale- increases in deaths as well as a tightening in already very strict rules enforced by new laws. Bleak stuff- people need some hope, not tenable to go on months of this. It'll have far reaching consequences otherwise.
Danzy wrote: » The US is behind us in cases per million.
BanditLuke wrote: » They can't it's just a few loons on here. We are in this for the long haul.
hmmm wrote: » If we see these occuring in specific clusters (e.g. nursing homes), and little in the way of community transmission, it makes no sense to have the entire country in lockdown. I don't believe we are at that point yet, but it may come.
kravmaga wrote: » AGS are Public servants and are here to maintain law and order and control the movement of idiots going to their 2nd holidays homes in different parts of Ireland with potential to spread the virus to rural areas. ie Connemara as an example. All the recruits who were training in Templemore have been seconded to full Garda status and are assisting in Policing duties. Ive no issue with the Gardai, they are doing their job.
hmmm wrote: » If we see these occuring in specific clusters (e.g. nursing homes), and little in the way of community transmission, it makes no sense to have the entire country in lockdown. I don't believe we are at that point yet, but it may come. The lockdown is economically devastating, and without an economy we can't pay for healthcare and food and the public service employees etc., and very damaging to health for many people. I know everyone wants to reduce the risk from Covid, but at some point we will have to loosen restrictions even though the threat has not completely passed.
Juwwi wrote: » The Dublin Mater hospital is at full capacity now for ICU beds with nurses in the wards reporting patients getting worse . There is no way restrictions are going to be eased and people should stop getting complacent. We aren't doing aswell as some other Countries , maybe we are doing better than some at the moment but because our poor Health System and few ICU beds we are only a week or 2 from turning into another Italy hospital situation of not being able to cope if things go bad .
Tenzor07 wrote: » How many are we talking here realistically? Does anyone know someone who has a holiday home in Connemara? So you have a bunch of Police officers barely out of training school who can now arrest and imprison law abiding citizens once it's of their opinion that you're not complying. How long will public support last when we may see a video of a 20yr old Gard arresting a pensioner for sitting out on her porch? Will it stop groups of lads from hanging around drinking cans or racing motorbikes around? My answer to that would be no.
ITman88 wrote: » The only demographic affected by the laws put in power last night are civilised well meaning people. The scumbags will still be scumbags. Curtain twitching Cathy will now, however, be able to report her neighbours to Gardaí for walking her dog too far down the road
tobefrank321 wrote: » I doubt anyone will report anyone for walking their dog. But if someone has tested positive for covid 19 and continues with their daily lives, then absolutely they should be reported, and the person reporting shouldn't feel any remorse about it.
Cyrus wrote: » the restrictions will start to be lifted, if not on Sunday, then the following weekend, the new powers are only in force until sunday night. .