lainey_d_123 wrote: » Oh, well that's grand then, once you're alright, Jack. No need to worry about the many, many people who are NOT doing OK, and who will be unable to cope with this situation if it went on for many months.
ITman88 wrote: » No one is suggesting that. It has however been happening for years now, so while you were being passive aggressive you need to check out what’s being going on in Italy for a number of years
ITman88 wrote: » So are you suggesting we lift the restrictions then? Do the opposite of the UK?
lainey_d_123 wrote: » There's no way people can cope with it being that long. Honestly just no way. The only reason there should ever be an 'explosion of cases' once people have been locked down for several weeks is if mass travel starts up again. I can understand that being pushed back as far as possible. But this extreme social distancing and isolation cannot last for months more. Such an incredible lack of empathy, it's unbelievable. You do realise a lot of people have mental and physical health needs which are going completely or almost completely unmet during this crisis? As everything else is shelved in favour of coronavirus stuff, people are going without therapy sessions, medication and having operations pushed back, and on top of all this, are unable to do anything which might help, such as meet friends, play group sports or any of the other things which are normally suggested when you're having a hard time? How do you think it feels for someone with chronic depression or illness to be stuck inside 24/7, alone? That's only one aspect. There's also the pressure it puts on relationships, probably an increase in domestic violence, people cracking under pressure trying to homeschool kids, do housework AND work from home, in addition to the worries and stress many people are facing about money, security and work at the moment. You might be fine, but that doesn't mean everyone else is. Pretty hard to focus on reading or doing online courses when you're in a terrible mental state and have no idea when it will end.
Thelonious Monk wrote: » Lainey your posts are a bit hysterical on these matters. You are freaking out about the whole thing but most of us are doing ok.
Raconteuse wrote: » Let the over 60s and immuno-compromised just die in their hundreds per day like in Italy and Spain eh? Shur they're only useless people anyway.
lainey_d_123 wrote: » They basically are. A lockdown so strict that people are being shamed for exercising outside (even when officially allowed) and only expected to go out for essential food is basically being imprisoned in your home. What else would you call it? I'm certainly not free to do whatever I want and would certainly be stopped if i tried to do something as inoffensive as read a book in the park in the sun. This is a total stripping of civil liberties - whether it's for the greater good is irrelevant. Stop lying to yourself about what it is.
niallo27 wrote: » Exactly, could you imagine what the generations who fought wars would have said, get back to work you soft *****, i saw thousands die all around me and you are afraid of a virus.
ITman88 wrote: » We don’t know if it’s the restrictions. What is implemented elsewhere may not be effective in Ireland. I think we should of followed Singapore’s stance, kids in school and business open. Then shut the airports. Implementing a lockdown is useless if its not implemented within a 10 day timeframe. To early or to late and it will have no effects. We can’t compare Ireland to mainland Europe or the UK. We don’t have any historical issues with flu endemics like the ageing populations in Europe have had over the last few years. The Italian health service have had warnings about this before and they also had triage issues and overcrowding like they are experiencing now. In Italy they had an incredibly low number of flu deaths this season in comparison to recent years and thus a number of vulnerable people were then in a precarious scenario when this hit. (Germany interestingly had a very difficult flu season with many deaths accountable to flu up to February) Our population density is also a positive in a pandemic, in Lombardy they have an ageing 10m in an area the size of Munster. The ageing population in Italy was becoming such a problem that they introduced grants to encourage people to have kids. I believe we won’t see anything like we have seen on the European mainland, I’ll stay optimistic
KiKi III wrote: » Fact check: No one is imprisoned in their homes. No one is suggesting this should go on indefinitely.
HBC08 wrote: » Well if there's one source I want my information from during this pandemic its officials in the UK.
Kermit.de.frog wrote: » I'd go with the end of July for the beginning of relaxing measures across Europe and in Ireland and the middle of 2021 to see a return to normality. No government is going to relax the measures so long as the threat of a renewed explosion in cases is there. Because we will just be shut down again within a week. A lot of unrealistic expectations around.
KiKi III wrote: » Why? What’s so hard about it? You have access to every movie, book and piece of music ever created, exercise, plenty of ways to keep in touch with people, you can buy groceries and alcohol. The weather is generally grand and you can get out in it every day. Tons of free online courses to keep your mind stimulated. What’s the problem?
KiKi III wrote: » The reason things are not too bad here yet is because of the restrictions you’re so keen to get rid of.....
ITman88 wrote: » Most are ignoring this. It is exactly the elephant! Officials in the UK did a study last week on the effects of the restrictions and determined a shrink in the economy of 6% is the equilibrium where the economic contraction will cause more deaths. It’s forbidden however from being mentioned by many posters, you will be accused of immaturity/lack of empathy/not understanding the effects of the virus etc.
average_runner wrote: » I think by middle of May we be back in the office. 6 weeks of this and the country is bankrupt so will have no choice.
Gael23 wrote: » You can’t imprison people in their homes indefinitely
niallo27 wrote: » Or they could have said the opposite. Its very easy spin things.
is_that_so wrote: There's a reason why we tell kids how many sleeps till Santa! We too need that 7-10 days blanky every so often during this. If we get to the end of April without any sign of an end there is a far higher risk people will begin to flout the restrictions.
Ace2007 wrote: » So which restriction are you going to ease - let people roam around in large numbers again?
KiKi III wrote: » Given that the Spanish Flu killed more WW1 soldiers than any battle, I think they’d tell you to stay home.https://www.worldwar1centennial.org/index.php/communicate/press-media/wwi-centennial-news/3978-flu-killed-more-world-war-i-troops-than-any-battle.html
KiKi III wrote: » Italy has had a far stricter lockdown in place for longer. Of course this can’t go on forever, but people calling for the relaxation of restrictions at this very early stage are being recklessly premature.
Ace2007 wrote: » Or they would have said, I had to go fight for my country, all your country is asking you to do is stay in doors - watch tv and cup of tea - do whatever you want to do at home. Grow up and stop being so selfish