Charles Babbage wrote: » But that family wouldn't like to see you die alone in hospital either.
tdf7187 wrote: » The restrictions are already causing disproportionate hardship and should be relaxed if not entirely removed. Sweden has none and is doing fine. But hey it's great for the coppers and their overtime so celebrate.
AdamD wrote: » I think some people are ignoring the elephant in the room. Utterly destroying the economy would kill more people than the virus and that's why the lockdown can't be indefinite
easypazz wrote: » While you may have all those nice things, there are plenty who don't. Like old people trapped in their home alone.
jayp2020 wrote: » Exactly. Old people and young people trapped in their home alone. And even if they do have those nice things it's not a substitute for human company. Seriously is anyone else on this thread living alone? It's a completely different ballgame.
Dravokivich wrote: » You dont have to be living alone, to be alone.
GooglePlus wrote: » I agree, they could build roads in shopping centres as well, with every shop having a pull up and collect option. Drive In cinemas, Drive through restaurants. You could even have a pull up pub and have a pint with your friends parked up.
Assetbacked wrote: » If they're going to a shop it's better they drive than walk as they won't interact with anyone on the way, same with going to work.
kieran. wrote: » What further step up measures do you think will be imposed?
ITman88 wrote: » Most are ignoring this. It is exactly the elephant! Officials in the UK did a study last week on the effects of the restrictions and determined a shrink in the economy of 6% is the equilibrium where the economic contraction will cause more deaths.
GT89 wrote: » Tbh I am following the measures at the moment for the two week period but if it is extended then I will start to break the restrictions and breach the 2km radius. I think it will get to the point if they extend the measures for too long a period then people will just ignore especially now the weather is improving. I think it will get to the point where the measures will be so widly ignored by the vast majority it will be unenforceable.
jules5417 wrote: » They could day nobody can go out at all except for essentials. Anybody out walking will be fined.
Deleted User wrote: » I'm in Louth and have been tramping around the roads within 2km these last few days. Without doubt there were far more cars on the road today! For Sunday, Monday and Tuesday it was very quiet, today was different, in fact the road was quite dangerous again. I drove later to a small centra a few KM away to get bread , its right beside the beach, things were very busy around the area of the shop and car park, I think people are already relaxing the rules a bit.
storker wrote: » I'm old enough to have lived through a number of recessions. I don't remember one where it was necessary to create temporary morgues to hold all the dead.
[Deleted User] wrote: » If new treatment being trialed starts proving very helpful at keeping people out of the ICUs and then out of hospitals, and becomes more readily available, AND that current measures are proved successful at keeping it at bay in the community there, then one or two relaxations could be made. Elderly people might no longer have to cocoon. One solution to keep people from going out all together might be to limit certain days to surnames beginning with certain letters, eg people (driver if the car in case of couples/families) with certain years of birth can go out specified days. EG.,birth years 1930-1969 can go out Mondays & Saturdays, 1970-1999 can go out Tuesdays, Thursdays & Sundays, birth years 2000 on can go out Wednesdays & Fridays. Very hard to police, but some way to stop the world all going out to the one place at the one time, whilst still allowing some recreation and change of scenery.
lord quackinton wrote: » I expect restrictions until end of April Then the restrictions will be relaxed until fully gone by end of may The cure cannot be worse then the disease - something trump is getting hammered for saying it 4 weeks and we will all say it
Niner leprauchan wrote: » We havent established any yet and our existing morgue are not full. So far 85 people have died in a month. You think the country is so healthy that we can't handle that? The majority were old and could have died anyway. How many less road fatalities as a result of isolating? I'm not saying it's a walk in the park and I know it will get worse before it gets better but folks, it's not the end of days
Drifter50 wrote: » Agreed, best estimate at the min is 30 billion, half of what the bank bailout cost and that took 7/ 8 years to pay back. All capital spending houses etc etc will be on indefinite hold and it ooks like we are consigning another generation to austerity
easypazz wrote: » If its all over in 4 weeks it might be. But the downturn could spread out over a year or more and people die from suicide, lack of heating, alcoholism etc.
michaelm wrote: » The pressing issue is what to do about the Leaving Cert - this is the only situation where this is a major and immediate consequence. The Junior Cert can wait. I've absolutely no insider information but reckon they will need to run it in some form during the summer or early autumn. It is actually a huge headache with no simple or straightforward solution. There is a lot of project work complete/almost complete, should this be included? If so schools will need to return for a number of weeks before the exams, in fact they would need to do this for all subjects anyway - can't see many teachers/students happy to go straight to exams as they would have lost the crucial final 10 weeks. A huge conundrum for al involved.