FrancieBrady wrote: » So you reckon the problem is the 'unions'. Why haven't FF and FG taken them on if the problem is so obvious?
Wanderer78 wrote: » theyre still in full control, of course you re right on some points, but expect this 'partnership' to carry on for a long time, possibly indefinitely, they ll do everything in their power to remain in power, blocking alternatives. the only thing the alternatives can do is influence ffg, which is currently what is happening, and is somewhat working
Ballso wrote: » It's politically impossible to take them on. You are over in another thread yellow-vesting about resourcing in the middle of a global pandemic ffs. Imagine the perception of scaling back numbers in the HSE from the hysterical twitter mob in normal times, it would be political suicide for any party. If the "neo-liberal" wing of our political establishment can't sort out the inefficiencies in health there isn't a hope in hell populists like SF can.
TheCitizen wrote: » Who's fault it it that the health service is in worse nick than ever in this country after two terms of FG lead governments despite a few years of economic prosperity and many promises when they were in opposition prior to that that they would reform the public health system?
TheCitizen wrote: » It's for the good anyway that the cosy FFG cartel is under threat via the rise of Sinn Féin. They'll (FFG) have to up their game if they want to cling on to power. At some point one of Tweedledee or Tweedledum might outsprint the other and the current carry on of one of them taking turns being the senior partner may come to an end.
Runaways wrote: » Well we’re not locked into orange v green and the massive divides for a start. And your analogy only works if we also say Leo is equally as inept as Maria Bailey. Just cos you think one member of a party is crap means they all must crap on that party be isnt really how this works I’m afraid.
TheCitizen wrote: » Nope. The issue with the health system is the vested interests are buddies with FFG. The consultants that rub shoulders with FGers and FFers down the golf club and that send their kids to the same schools.
Ballso wrote: » It's politically impossible to take them on. .
TheCitizen wrote: » Nope. The issue with the health system is the vested interests are buddies with FFG. The consultants that rub shoulders with FGers and FFers down the golf club and that send their kids to the same schools. FG and FF don't have the political will to take them on, they don't even want to take them on. They (FFG) feel beholding to them and the others in society that are in the top wage brackets, the builders etc. Health and Housing the two biggest issues in Ireland and we're going to have a government lead by two parties that thus far have failed time and time and time again to tackle the vested interests in both sectors and initiate real reform.
FrancieBrady wrote: » It 'has' been...is what you mean. Why? Because we have a power swap in this country. It is not in the interests of FG or FF to fix anything if it damages them. Hence so much disaster in public services. As the crisis shows, if the will is there...etc etc.
Wanderer78 wrote: » i will agree its a good idea both of them are being put under pressure from the likes of sf, but never underestimate ffg's real power
jh79 wrote: » You're not suggesting that SF would take them on? It's not in their DNA. They'll cut wages at the top end and increase the bottom ultimately leading to a bigger PS wage bill.
Eamonn8448 wrote: » my grandfather is long dead and he played his part too , one day lad smart arses like you shall get their just deserts , its a small island !
Ballso wrote: » Nobody said the problems are "just unions".
Ballso wrote: I can see SF taking on the unions and eliminating the inefficiencies causing the problems in our health service alright.
Deleted User wrote: » Ah would you stop, there's always someone else for SF to blame. DUP are bad bastards too, and lousy at actual governance, but there is a pair of them in it. Sorry, just to edit, the idea we should ignore their performance in NI is bizarre. We can see there exactly what SF do in power, and it's nothing much.
jh79 wrote: » A quick google says we spend 500 million pa on consultant wages from a total of 6500 million pa across the whole health service. The maths don't really work out for the populist "elites should pay for everything" SF approach.
Shefwedfan wrote: » Again, power sharing Instead of talking to press the idea would be to talk to the DUP, only a gob**t negotiated via the press. That’s what SF do, same with Mary Lou shouting about FF, instead of talking to FF she was shouting to RTÉ Your point is a negative, not a positive. SF have learned nothing from shutting down the North assembly for 3 years, the way they are going it will be closed down again soon
Shefwedfan wrote: » One term of SF in power and let’s see how much their support dwindles. That’s the issue now and why I would prefer to throw SF into power now SF and seemingly their supports are great at throwing mud at opposite but not too great at doing anything As I said al along, stick them in now, give it 12 months and apart from the social welfare crew the entire country will be kicking them to touch. Then we won’t have to listen to page after page of thread like this with all talk and no action Problem is Mary Lou couldn’t negotiate her way out of a wet paper bag so she will not get anyone to join up with them, so rest of us will have to listen to years of this s**t about “ well SF would have done xyz”, God help us all....
[Deleted User] wrote: » Even prior to Covid, the health system was not in the worst nick we've ever had in this country. If you take the time to read about the health system prior to the mid 1990's it was way, way (like comprehensively) worse. Don't let rose tinted glasses fool you.
[Deleted User] wrote: » I don't think one member of SF is crap, I think as a governing party in NI they have been inept (except maybe on education). Most the metrics support my view, tbf.
FrancieBrady wrote: » You did. Stop trying to row away from what you clearly said is 'causing the problems in our health services' Jesus, you guys are unreal!
TheCitizen wrote: » If you’re trying to make out that the health service we have in this country is up to scratch considering the overall wealth of this country then you’re talking through your hoop. That’s a poor excuse you’re attempting to make for the consistent failure of FFG to face down vested interests and reform the health service. Pathetic stuff.
Randy Archer wrote: » Nice to see SF doing partitionism when it suits them Imagine closing down Parliament over a language package that won’t be used by anyone and will cost way too much on already limited funds. Whatever about closing down due to Sharleene and Cash for ash but nope, close down over a proxy Irish language act ...
Ballso wrote: » AND There's a conjunction in that sentence. I know SF draw a lot of support from the uneducated but that's ridiculous.
FrancieBrady wrote: » You just keep digging and digging that hole. LOOK at who negotiated a deal with the DUp. LOOK at who walked away from that deal and LOOK at who endorsed that walk away. LOOK at how the deal was eventually done when the DUP were finished with by the people who had endorsed them previously. Of course you won't look at that and will continue to do the digging.
Runaways wrote: » What is the aim here..make him look cutsie and relatable or even human? Or leader like and workin hard Either the way the fawning over him is nauseating