wat24 wrote: » I said this several times to receptionist and basically was told three symptoms or not a hope of a test! She more of least implied to ring back later and say I have a cough.
Fann Linn wrote: » That, I'd say is the problem. Cost of testing.
Ninthlife wrote: » Since when is a receptionist qualified to determine whi gets tested
Deleted User wrote: » At the end of the day, a test is just a test. It’s frustrating that it’s taking a long time to get tested, but over 90% are coming back negative. That suggests that too many people are asking to be tested that really don’t need to be. If you get bad, ring an ambulance.
[Deleted User] wrote: » At the end of the day, a test is just a test. It’s frustrating that it’s taking a long time to get tested, but over 90% are coming back negative. That suggests that too many people are asking to be tested that really don’t need to be. If you get bad, ring an ambulance.
Martina1991 wrote: » There is a constant supply of swabs. There is also a need for testing kits and reagents for lab analysis. There may be issues with supply of these down the line.
Martina1991 wrote: » I can absolutely see the benefit of trying to test everyone we can but i think the testing criteria should have been extended bit by bit to those with more severe symptoms or contact with a confirmed case and then extend the criteria to anyone who wishes to be tested when we can keep up with demand. That's just my opinion.
Martina1991 wrote: » Yes busy doing their routine work for hospitals, clinics and GPs. Smaller hospitals with fewer staff will take longer to implement the service. The service is running in hospitals in Dublin, Cork, Limerick and Galway atm. Staff are now rostered in teams to prevent staff mixing together. That means the number of staff in is reduced and people are stretched. I got the number 12 on twitter from the past president of the ACMLS Irene Regan.
Martina1991 wrote: » There are already many plans in place for preparation and more to come. Our hospital ICU has gone from having 6 beds to having 24 if needed.There is a lot of work being done behind the scenes that isn't reported in the media.
STB. wrote: » I know. We have failed at the testing phase. That job is to test, identify and isolate. That needs to change or the knock on effect will be catastrophic.
Deleted User wrote: » and in the meantime infect people? You need a medical cert to stay off work and get illness benefit. My job is still working with full staff (civil service) so in order to self isolate I need a medical cert saying I have something . I currently have one saying I am waiting Covid test - but if I am not getting test do I just to back to work where there are 50 other people in my area? I still have a sore throat and cough, but if HSE say you need to have a fever then I dont have Covid ?
Flippyfloppy wrote: » It doesn't fill me with confidence that the hse can't even get over the first hurdle of testing everyone who needs to be tested, how will they treat everyone who needs to be treated.
[Deleted User] wrote: » and in the meantime infect people? You need a medical cert to stay off work and get illness benefit. My job is still working with full staff (civil service) so in order to self isolate I need a medical cert saying I have something . I currently have one saying I am waiting Covid test - but if I am not getting test do I just to back to work where there are 50 other people in my area? I still have a sore throat and cough, but if HSE say you need to have a fever then I dont have Covid ?
Happyilylost wrote: » Maybe the issue is the HSE weren't expecting to be testing as many who DIDN'T need to be tested. 94% negative. That figure needs to sit in everyone's head.
Bigboldworld wrote: » There’s obviously major issues with the testing, why aren’t the likes of croker and the army ship rammed with people getting tests, croker was deserted yesterday
STB. wrote: » Of an alleged 18k. There are multiples of that waiting to be tested, since the 13th March. 40k waiting with symptoms. That's a figure that needs to sit in your head. They wont know who didn't need to be tested until they test them. The virus is asymptomatic and highly contagious.
Deleted User wrote: » Wait for your test. Ring your GP back to confirm if it’s still going ahead. If not, ask him when you can return to work. 94% are negative so obviously too many are getting tested that don’t need to be. Maybe that’s blocking you which is frustrating.You can understand their dilemma when so many are negative and every country is fighting for testing kits.
Deleted User wrote: » But 18k is certainly a big enough sample to get an idea of the positive vs negative %. If it’s 94% negative, of course they’re going to want to make testing criteria more strict.
[Deleted User] wrote: » Wait for your test. Ring your GP back to confirm if it’s still going ahead. If not, ask him when you can return to work. 94% are negative so obviously too many are getting tested that don’t need to be. Maybe that’s blocking you which is frustrating. You can understand their dilemma when so many are negative and every country is fighting for testing kits.
wat24 wrote: » So I contacted my gp back and receptionist apologised that she had misunderstood only fever and one other symptom needed. Very hard on GPs and staff they walked into work at 8am this morning and haven’t even time to get to grips with new criteria.
[Deleted User] wrote: » This is a problem as well. It’s easy for government to announce something on TV but each GP needs to brief all their staff and set expectations.
fattymuatty wrote: » Can I ask what the new case definition is? I was just googling about half an hour ago to look for what you needed to get tested and couldn't find it.
CIARAN_BOYLE wrote: » Having the ability to test everyone is rediculous South korea hasn't tested everyone. They've tested 300k total according to a NY times article dated Monday.https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/23/world/asia/coronavirus-south-korea-flatten-curve.html?0p19G=2870 On a per capita basis that would be like testing 30k people here. As the situation in Korea has gone on longer than it has here I don't think our testing regime has failed. Instead I would say that it's overwhelmed with the test numbers. As such we have to ask ourselves are we Italy or Spain who are just overwhelmed and have to abandon community testing. Or are we testing people that shouldn't be tested.It's sad but there are resource limits.