CIARAN_BOYLE wrote: » Probably a bit of both. The number of test kits is probably pitched at the lab capability. If they can test 2,000 a day then there's no panic over the number of test kits. If they suddenly trebled their lab capability the test kits would run out faster and they would panic about test kits. If someone with one symptom can't be referred for a test now why wouldnt you remove someone already referred from the que?Unfortunately community testing is limited by the facilities available. There's a reason why so many countries are abandoning community testing. They don't have the capability as the numbers infected ramp up.
STB. wrote: We carried out 10-13,000 tests.
STB. wrote: Why aren't their enough kits ?
STB. wrote: Why have we a backlog of people waiting in some cases (two weeks according to a boards thread here).
STB. wrote: What are the commercial labs and university hospitals labs etc doing ?
bennyl10 wrote: » So a dry coughs aNd shortness with no fever means no test? What if you’re currently in the que for a test?
Martina1991 wrote: » It's around 18,000 as of today
Martina1991 wrote: » Because a lot of countries are also trying to acquire them and manufacturers can only produce so many a day.
Martina1991 wrote: » The criteria went from being strict to being too loose overnight.
Martina1991 wrote: » Now thousands are looking to be tested no matter how mild their symptoms.
Martina1991 wrote: » Commercial labs dont have the necessary equipment or qualified staff to perform testing. More hospital labs will start providing testing in the coming weeks/ months.
Martina1991 wrote: » It's around 18,000 as of today. Because a lot of countries are also trying to acquire them and manufacturers can only produce so many a day. The criteria went from being strict to being too loose overnight. Now thousands are looking to be tested no matter how mild their symptoms. Commercial labs dont have the necessary equipment or qualified staff to perform testing. More hospital labs will start providing testing in the coming weeks/ months.
based on 55924 laboratory confirmed cases, typical signs and symptoms include: fever (87.9%), dry cough (67.7%), fatigue (38.1%), sputum production (33.4%), shortness of breath (18.6%), sore throat (13.9%), headache (13.6%), myalgia or arthralgia (14.8%), chills (11.4%), nausea or vomiting (5.0%), nasal congestion (4.8%), diarrhea (3.7%), and hemoptysis (0.9%), and conjunctival congestion (0.8%).
Danye wrote: » Hi guys, Sorry for jumping in here but I’m in isolation awaiting testing but I’ve no fever. Sore throat, blocked nose, a cough that’s got progressively worse and a lost of taste. Has it being confirmed that anybody without a fever won’t be tested or will this apply to cases from now on?
ax530 wrote: New criteria for testing had 'and fever' had been or But if you have any symptoms act as if you have Corona isolation ect just won't be tested 6-7% tests positive so by changing criteria they focusing more. Press conference was on rte news now they very informative
GaGa21 wrote: » So they're going to leave people with a fever waiting 1-2 weeks to be tested? Some confirmed cases have not had fevers. For others, it may not be a symptom at the start of illness. If someone has all other symptoms of a dry cough, sore throat, aches, fatigue, shortness of breath, they don't get tested?This will not be good....
GaGa21 wrote: » So they're going to leave people with a fever waiting 1-2 weeks to be tested? Some confirmed cases have not had fevers. For others, it may not be a symptom at the start of illness. If someone has all other symptoms of a dry cough, sore throat, aches, fatigue, shortness of breath, they don't get tested? This will not be good....
calfmuscle wrote: » Why? Testing, as stated constantly on the daily updates does NOT dictate treatment. If you are unwell liaise with your gp and if necessary attend hospital. Tests do NOT dictate treatment. Symptoms DO! ��*♀️
STB. wrote: » They dictate isolation, which in turn triggers contact tracing and further testing an isolation of the clusters of infection, preventing further transmission. We cannot flatten the curve if we start choosing who to test because of a failure in the testing regime. The other hospital labs need to concentrate on clearing the backlog, rather than concentrating on repeat testing of those already infected. Surely, there are loads of virology and chemical company labs suitable in Ireland for gen seq testing ?
calfmuscle wrote: Testing, as stated constantly on the daily updates does NOT dictate treatment. If you are unwell liaise with your gp and if necessary attend hospital. Tests do NOT dictate treatment. Symptoms DO! 🀦*♀ï¸
calfmuscle wrote: » No a test does not DICTATE isolation!
amadangomor wrote: What medical training do you have? How are you the arbeiter of who should be tested and who shouldn't be? Unfounded opinions from internet 'experts' like you is unhelpful and potentially dangerous.
GaGa21 wrote: » Ah sure why bother testing at all then! Let's all do that so and see how it goes. There's testing for a reason, it's not for a cure but it is for prevention and preparation.
STB. wrote: » A positive test does dictate isolation. It also triggers contact tracing and any further spreading, especially in clusters. It is WHO's recommendation for slowing down/or elimination of the pandemic. Test & Isolate. Rinse and repeat. We have 40-50,000 people waiting having passed the crieria for referral by GP's. Some of those waiting with symptoms are told they are being long fingered even further. That is not good enough. I deleted the rest of your post as its just a rant about nothing.
CIARAN_BOYLE wrote: » According to the press briefing today the case definition is being aligned with the who case definition. The WHO says test test test. Do the WHO say who to test? Test the hyperchondriacs? What about the asthmatics who are coughing as normal? Or the people with colds? No the WHO issue a case definition to define who should be tested. We are adopting that with the change in policies. We had a wider definition before that led to the testing services being unable to cope. No country can test everyone. If we test the people with a one in ten chance of having the virus and don't test the people with a one in 30 chance of having the virus we are more likely to find cases.
wellwhynot wrote: » Topdolla Sorry if I missed it but can you give a rough timeline of your symptoms. Am I right in estimating you are on week 4?
STB. wrote: » . I'd be grateful for a source for that, not that I am doubting you. So just a backlog of 45k to be long fingered even more. We have known about this for a long time. The first thing you check is whether you have enough test kits for obvious reasons. Thought you told me previously there were loads of kits available. You mean the part were the "where you in Italy" requirement was dropped on Friday 13/3. Yes, it was based largely then upon GP's recommendations depending on symptoms criteria for referral given it was now at "community level". You mean those that don't collapse on the floor from lack of oxygen. They still require testing to isolate and contain, however "mild" their symptoms, given the virus can be asymptomatic anyway. Commercial labs don't have the equipment ? The hospital labs will be ready in the coming weeks or months! Are they busy doing something else ? Thought you told me previously there were 12 labs. In order to fight it, we need lots of tests and lots of isolation and we need to do it quickly. In order that it doesnt spread to a stage that it overwhelm the medical system at bed and ICU/ventilator level. That is the South Korea model. Its not what we are doing. Between this and not enough PPE for frontline staff, I've just about heard it all at this stage. And we are only starting this fight.