Vertigo100 wrote: » Anyone have the list of non essential retailers? Work in an off license so not sure where we stand.
ixoy wrote: » I mean trickier to police to ensure people are staying apart. I do think our lower density will help us a bit.
Ah come off it. Are you seriously saying people over 60 in Italy are not normally considered for respirator treatment?
realdanbreen wrote: » Are these the same experts who saw no problem allowing thousands of rugby fans come from the worst affected areas of Italy come and cram into crowded bars in Dublin. Seriously I am an admirer of the way all parties have come together on this but what Leo has announced just now is not firm enough IMO.
SuperRabbit wrote: » the pandemic payment is higher than my usual monthly wage... wtf... if they had this much spare money why didn't they solve the homeless crisis.. would it not make more sense to keep the pandemic payment low, or just raise it to 250, but freeze mortages and ask landlords to pause rent anyway the decision was made by people much smarter than me so i'll shut up... i know i shouldn't look a gift horse in the mouth, i better save this because it can't last.
Deleted User wrote: » This is so true. The green folk are in favour of us living in much higher density (though not the high density of tower blocks and with storage, roof gardens, terraces etc) but in these situations that is not so good. The idea of these communal kitchens in living hubs that is in favour to solve the housing crisis is a huge mistake in my opinion, and these places will be either knocked down ir repurposed in the future, and looked upon with as much disdain as high-rise Ballymun was.
ThewhiteJesus wrote: » Look at other countries it's not that hard, we have enough bodies in the army and gardai to spread out and manage the situation. I'm sure plenty of people would be willing to be redeployed too, including myself.
aido79 wrote: » I have lost count of the number of secondary schools I've heard that had school tours to northern Italy around that time. Should they have been left stranded over there? What else do you think Leo should have done?
CWF wrote: » How long are gyms, cafes, restaurants etc supposed to close until, April 19th like the schools?
SCOOP 64 wrote: » Yes, all good after that Virus should be long gone.
Cork Boy 53 wrote: » Sarcasm detector in operation.
CWF wrote: » Sounds good but a little optimistic perhaps. Fingers crossed though.
Scotty # wrote: » Or we could follow Donald Trumps example and just let nature take it's course! (that's not actually a suggestion!)
Kerrydude1981 wrote: » Are builder's providers allowed to stay open?
Iscreamkone wrote: » If we had a 3 week lockdown, everyone in the community who had it would get better without passing it on. Those bad enough to need hospitalisation would go there. Some would die some would get better. And that would be the end of it. If we lockdown properly for 3 weeks why wouldn’t it be over?
easypazz wrote: » For starters essential workers, healthcare, shop assistants, etc. would still be getting in and pass it on. And not everybody would engage in a lockdown.
realdanbreen wrote: » Not in 1 week 2 weeks whatever, NOW! While most people are adhering to the health advice you cannot expect the gobshytes like those clowns packing beaches and parks to obey unless they are forced to. Shutdown NOW.
SCOOP 64 wrote: » This is it, my job non essential but owner said open tomorrow as usual.