nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

FE1 Exam Thread (Read 1st post!) NOTE: YOU MAY SWAP EXAM GRIDS

Tom Young

This is the new FE1 Exam Thread

This is a link to the old one: http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055143169

This is a link to the next one: http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2056907164

Sorry, I'm aware we are in the throws of FE1 season, but due to a server issue, a new thread was required. Old chats and posts below - Thanks!

Mod warning in post #1205: http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=88514663&postcount=1205

Mod warning in post #2555: http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=91819622&postcount=2555

Mod warning in post #2593: http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=92025688&postcount=2593

Moderator: The above warnings mean it is not ok to buy, sell or swap (trade) any exam materials in this thread. Exam grids are the only exception. You may request and exchange exam grids but at no point will money be allowed to change hands for them.

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

user115

How would people answer Q1 Constit last sitting Oct 2019? It's the emission controls agency taking action against Diesel Fuels ltd?

iamanengine

user115 wrote: »

I'm too afraid to look at the papers again....Revising is taking me ages but I think I retaining info, like I'm taking my time with it to understand but going to be under serious pressure revising equity in 2 and 1/2 days I have about 4 topcis revised in equity thought i'd have time tonight or tomorrow to do bit more but I'd say it's unlikely, constit is taking up so much time.

In Shatter v Guerin is it basically saying that Shatter's right to fair procedures was not interfered with because the the report was not the last word?

Make sure you have the SC case for Shatter, they found his right to fair procedure was interfered with, it made adverse conclusions re Shatter and it exceeded its scope as a preliminary report, must be given fair procedures (he should have been interviewed) where adverse conclusions are publicly reported

user115

Law1997 wrote: »

Is anyone else getting upset and frustrated wit the exam papers for Constitutional? It’s like I spend the whole day learning and then can’t even think when it comes to the papers :-( think I’m just exhausted

I'm too afraid to look at the papers again....Revising is taking me ages but I think I retaining info, like I'm taking my time with it to understand but going to be under serious pressure revising equity in 2 and 1/2 days

I have about 4 topcis revised in equity thought i'd have time tonight or tomorrow to do bit more but I'd say it's unlikely, constit is taking up so much time.

In Shatter v Guerin is it basically saying that Shatter's right to fair procedures was not interfered with because the the report was not the last word?

Law1997

Is anyone else getting upset and frustrated wit the exam papers for Constitutional? It’s like I spend the whole day learning and then can’t even think when it comes to the papers :-( think I’m just exhausted

PerryMason2020

ahhhhhFE1s wrote: »

Tbh 40 for one topic seems excessive.. Surely not??

Yeah, 40 seems excessive! I think look at how many of the 40 are saying the same thing and cut where needed. I'm not doing constitutional, but for criminal I noticed that I had several cases saying the same thing. I've cut a few of those out and will focus instead on any cases which might add something new or go against the grain etc. Given the time constraints, we can't write all that we know, nor should we, so I think some cherry picking is in order.

Sineaddh

I’m quite stuck for time now with still half of contract and equity to cover. Is there any topics that overlap between subjects to make my cramming any easier? Appreciate any advice!

ahhhhhFE1s

sm333 wrote: »

For liberty are people going with the cases in the city colleges night before notes? I feel like I couldn’t learn any more than the 40 there, just wouldn’t have time to write any more in the exam!

Tbh 40 for one topic seems excessive.. Surely not??

sm333

For liberty are people going with the cases in the city colleges night before notes? I feel like I couldn’t learn any more than the 40 there, just wouldn’t have time to write any more in the exam!

iamanengine

Remember guys, you know more than you think you do!

lawstudentirl

seeking789 wrote: »

Hello guys!

I am doing EU Law this sitting, would anyone be so kind to share their exam grid with me, would be much appreciated or just the very main topics that are likely to come up?

Thank you so much in advance!

Sure, just DM me your email

ahhhhhFE1s

shambles2020 wrote: »

For Property I have Adverse Possession, Co-Ownership, Construction of a will, Creation of a will, Easements, Estoppel Licences, Family Home, Finding, Mortgages, Rights of Residence and Succession ready to go. Will I be sorted?

Can't see you have any issues.. I only have 8 topics -Adverse Possession, Co-Ownership, Easements, Family Protection (117 Applications), Finding, Landlord and Tenant, License and Succession same as my friend did last sitting and passed no bother!

Although seeing how much you have done has worried me now haha

law_struggles

Criminal

In a problem Q, how do you know when to bring up endangerment, and when not to?

user115

Wonderstruck wrote: »

https://www.lawsociety.ie/Public/Become-a-Solicitor/FE-1-Exam/#coronavirus

No plans to cancel exams due to coronavirus ..... damn will I have to study now?

"No plans at present".....one can hope :P

shambles2020

For Property I have Adverse Possession, Co-Ownership, Construction of a will, Creation of a will, Easements, Estoppel Licences, Family Home, Finding, Mortgages, Rights of Residence and Succession ready to go. Will I be sorted?

Wonderstruck

https://www.lawsociety.ie/Public/Become-a-Solicitor/FE-1-Exam/#coronavirus

No plans to cancel exams due to coronavirus ..... damn will I have to study now?

Suzannec

Law1997 wrote: »

ME

Also me

Law1997

iamanengine wrote: »

Anyone else flip-flopping between absolutely freaking out, and then thinking it's actually grand, and then freaking out again?

user115

On fair procedures my notes are a bit mixed up on Goodman v Hamilton 2, was the ruling here that tribunal must uphold fair procedures if it impacts someones goodname and in such circumstances then Dail priviliedge gives way to fair procedures and Dail must disclose that info relating to good name of someone?

I'm so confused, any help would be great

Law000

Anyone know what Family Q came up last?

TCPIP

iamanengine wrote: »

Anyone else flip-flopping between absolutely freaking out, and then thinking it's actually grand, and then freaking out again?

Me at 9AM: OH **** OH **** OH ****
Me at 12PM: I think I'll go to the pub for a nice toasty...
Me at 3PM: OH **** OH **** OH ****

Stay tuned for 6PM...

Dancing Obsession

iamanengine wrote: »

Anyone else flip-flopping between absolutely freaking out, and then thinking it's actually grand, and then freaking out again?

Yes, I feel that kind of way

iamanengine

Anyone else flip-flopping between absolutely freaking out, and then thinking it's actually grand, and then freaking out again?

rightytighty

lawgrad15 wrote: »

Yes Brown did overrule Donly.

Consent must have been 1. freely given 2. for a lawful purpose.

Consent in Browne was freely given but not for a lawful purpose.

Perfect thanks!

lawgrad15

rightytighty wrote: »

Question on Non-Fatal Offences!

2018’s DPP v Browne overruled DPP v Dolny to say that assault causing harm DOES build on s2 NFOATPA97, and therefore require lack of consent?

Yes Brown did overrule Donly.

Consent must have been 1. freely given 2. for a lawful purpose.

Consent in Browne was freely given but not for a lawful purpose.

PerryMason2020

Hamerzan Sickles wrote: »

What are people covering/predicting for Criminal? A much larger course than it seems!

I'm leaving out detention, bail etc. Just can't face covering it. If I have time Wed I might look it over, but I'm focusing on offences and defences.

rightytighty

Question on Non-Fatal Offences!

2018’s DPP v Browne overruled DPP v Dolny to say that assault causing harm DOES build on s2 NFOATPA97, and therefore require lack of consent?

Dliodoir2021

Would anyone have list of topics that came up for company in october 2019 please? Whether it was a PQ or EQ! Don't have the paper.

Breacnua

OMGWACA wrote: »

Still looking for this please if anyone could help me out?

I would focus on Pye decision and contrast Ire with Uk more so than LRC reform as they were put to sleep with Pye decision

CDarrall

Hiya, does anyone have notes on the AG & President? Can swap for other notes/ grids etc. Thanks

OMGWACA

OMGWACA wrote: »

Has anyone a sample answer for Adverse Possession, an essay on reforms please?

Still looking for this please if anyone could help me out?