Ardent wrote: » Leo with a home run with the John Delaney analogy LOL
Finty Lemon wrote: » Cracks appearing all theough the SF manifesto.
Jizique wrote: » Wasn’t one of Haugheys kids running a helicopter company - he could do it for 500m
It wasnt me123 wrote: » Yes, why not? Work for your money - especially the youth - some of them came out of school straight into the welfare office - they have no skills, no experience, some are illiterate, can’t dress for work etc. Why not have them join the county councils as trainees, learning gardening, maintenance jobs, office work, etc. Social welfare is supposed to help you until you get a job - not be a career move. Don’t make it attractive to be on the dole. And let our indigenous brethren join in as well - everyone should work.
suicide_circus wrote: » ??? you even watching?
gmisk wrote: » I don't disagree with paying to see a gp, northern Ireland is a joke doctors surgery awash with people (speaking from experience), don't pay for doctors visit and don't pay for a prescription.
Venom wrote: » No surprise when a magic money tree is the basis for their entire manifesto.
CPTM wrote: » Will their supporters see them though. Lovely world they live in, just not the real world.
L1011 wrote: » In countries where the system actually works, yes. It doesn't here. But it'll cost a hell of a lot less with vastly better outcomes to fix that - either by making the Air Corps attractive enough for pilots not to leave or getting someone like CHC to do it - than to try make the regional/rural A&Es function to an acceptable level.
nerd69 wrote: » Im sure it's been said before but I'd make a donation for another debate chaired by Vinny b
Jinglejangle69 wrote: » Does Mary Lou ever answer a direct question without saying let me point out first..... Straight out of Gerrys book.
Vivienne23 wrote: » Agreed nobody should get anything for doing nothing , except the disabled , elderly , sick
JohnnyFlash wrote: » People are nostalgic about Vincent. He was a terrible presenter who mistook bluster and outrage for political debate.
TheRiverman wrote: » I will be voting for an Independent, nothing here to convince me otherwise.Mary Lou a huge disappointment.
Vivienne23 wrote: » That’s no harm tho is it ? Lots of undesirables around my area using hunting as a guise , I understand foxes need to be culled but there might be better ways than running them ragged by a pack of dogs
griffinlee wrote: » As someone who doesn't have any connection or affinity to any party. I like Mary lou but lacks depth in her policies the most Whilst I'm not his greatest fan, Lv seems the most detailed in this debate Micheal Martin looks lost at sea Just my opinion as an independent observer