Cork Trucker wrote: » That was late 2015/early 2016
Isambard wrote: » ok so 4 years but my point was are there not sections of that road a higher priority than rebuilding a section, crash barriers et al, which had only been put in a few years earlier. I'm thinking Ballybeg and the entire section from Charlebvile to Croom.
marno21 wrote: » M20 feasibility study in 2007 showed that at the time around 2,500 vehicles per day would switch to a motorway via Mitchelstown.
Reputable Rog wrote: » If the M20 was built it would take most of the Dublin bound traffic from the N72/N73 out of Mallow as the traffic would head onto Limerick.
Cookiemunster wrote: » I just heard Ryan on Ivan Yates. He didn't make a mistake the last time when he spoke about joining Cork to Limerick via the M7, because he just repeated it. I can only assume he wants people to travel between the two cities via Portlaoise. He's bloody delusional.
marno21 wrote: » He thinks the M8 is the M7. Which is easy to see cos Cork is signed from the M50 via the M7 (even if he has family in Glounthane). He speaks some sense (and did in that interview) but the brain farts and the loopy policies are the issue with him.
Sam Russell wrote: » He sees no problem with impractical policies - he should forget about road building and concentrate on making PT the issue. Buses need roads, and intercity bus services work better with motorways. Railways outside of high density areas are too expensive as they need lots of passengers all going to the same place. That only exists in Ireland in the larger cities, and people travelling to them. As I said elsewhere, he pursues the perfect to the detriment of the good - even to the extinction of the good. The M20 is needed if only to stop the carnage on the N20. The M8 is not part of the solution.
Hibernicis wrote: » I drove that poxy road again late last night. Spent 20 mins behind an 01 Seat with a single solitary rear light chugging along at 45/50 Kmh and hugging the centre line (and subsequently discovered he also had only one working headlight, on the nearside of course). Depressing stuff. And now this shows up ............Government does not know full cost of M20 road from Cork to Limerick In many ways the article is much ado about nothing, but it does add to the negative sentiment that is accumulating around this project and helps make it even more toxic. You really get to thinking that there is a God out there, and that she doesn't want this road to be built.
marno21 wrote: » Shocking article. Totally misleading and makes no effort to actually explain any of the points raised in the article. Head banging stuff. Great to create talking points for the Greens though
Isambard wrote: » there is some sense in an M24 Waterford to Cahir link, but of course they built the M9 instead.
pajoguy wrote: » "The actual price may not emerge for many years to come.........." I should apply for a job with the Irish Times if this is the ****e they come up with...... Why not do a detailed design for each route option and tender all of the route options..... The worry I have is Fine Gael might need the greens to get back into power and Leo canned this project previously. The road needs to be built and the "M24" needs to be built but the M20 needs to be the No. 1 priority roads project in this country. I understand the Greens have to look at their policies from an environmental perspective but what about all those people living on the M20. Noise and air pollution. Families of all those who have died on this road. The economic needs of all of south Limerick and all of North Cork. Commuters from all these areas have suffered for years. Get on and build this and cut the sh*t.
Idbatterim wrote: » the M20 should be built, but every other rural motorway or dual carriageway etc, needs to be shelved, until the M20, DU and DM are underway!
serfboard wrote: » So you might say, but meanwhile the N4 (Cooloney to Castlebaldwin), N5 (Castlebar to Westport), N22 (Macroom to Ballyvourney) rural dual carriageways are all under construction, and the N25 rural dual carriageway opened today. I don’t think that anyone is listening to you!
riddlinrussell wrote: » Ryan sometimes does my head in, the nuanced Green approach would be to say, "We wont be outright cancelling any road schemes, however anything that isn't already past planning will undergo a rigorous Cost/Benefit analysis against alternative public transport options, keeping in mind the commitment of 53.3% of the Infrastructure Budget towards sustainable public transport, because the M20 might indeed make sense, and if it does it will hold up to such scrutiny."
road_high wrote: » Yes 60/70 km to Dublin in the wrong direction would have made sense alright :pac: N24 is seperate route that needs upgrading. If anything the M8 should have came via the M9 route or the M7 link into the M8 at Cahir either of which would have been far more practical.
Isambard wrote: » Kind of ironic as that's what people are proposing for Cork to Limerik the M8 should have been built via Limerick. Lunacy to have two fairly lightly used motorways so closely following each other. (three if you include the M9). But we are where we are. I'd prefer to wonder whether the M9 was necessary at all rather than whether it would have been 60/70 km in the wrong direction via Cahir,