Brendan Bendar wrote: » Running what?
Bambi wrote: » There's a general election in Febuary Brendan, I'm not sure word has filtered through to FG HQ.
Hamsterchops wrote: » Arms importation.
Loafing Oaf wrote: » If FG continue to struggle in the polls, I wonder will Varadkar resort to SF-under-the-bed scaremongering? SF's apparent surge in the polls could ironically be a help to him here. If it looks like the same situation will pertain after this election as the last one, i.e. a government can only be formed by two out of three from FF, FG and SF, he can be justified in at least raising the question of whether FF can be trusted not to do a deal with SF.
blanch152 wrote: » You can still get FF/SF coalition at 12/1 on Paddy Power.
is_that_so wrote: » They have no control over what SF do and don't much care as far as I can see. FF is the real enemy to FG this time out.
FrancieBrady wrote: » FF, FG will go into power with whomsoever it takes.
blanch152 wrote: » I don't think it is as simple as that. Either party would require a new leader in order to go into coalition with SF.
Loafing Oaf wrote: » I'm not talking about the reality of what will happen after the election, I'm talking about FG raising the spectre of a FF/SF deal to frighten the middle classes back into FG's embrace. I'm sure the FG's war room is at least considering how to do it without coming across as desperate...
is_that_so wrote: » FF don't seem to be looking at SF anyway. The more sensible target is the Green/Lab/SD block and the less half-witted Indos.
Loafing Oaf wrote: » Yes FF might have tried to form a government with FF and other left parties after the last election but Martin evidently didn't give it any consideration...
Loafing Oaf wrote: » Nobody doubts that. The question is what happens if the numbers dictate it has to be two out of three from FF, FG and SF again. Varadkar has already said he would be prepared to support a minority FF government but Martin has given no such commitment...
efanton wrote: » what there are two Fianna Fail parties. Oh no's, the country is destroyed i tell you. Bottom line is all this pre-election debate about who will jump into bed with who is a load of nonsense. FF might prefer LAB or the Greens but when push comes to shove and the numbers dont stack they will definitely consider a SF coalition. Would FG do the same, they might not, but I guarantee you that they certainly would give it serious consideration despite what they might be telling the electorate. The reality is unless Labour get a significant bounce, and personally I cant see that happening, the number of seats held by the smaller parties will be so diluted that whether you like it or not SF might end up the king makers in this election. It will probably be a choice for FG or FF of including SF in government or accepting that they will be in opposition. If FF increase their number of seats, but come far short of a majority, they will have to rely on the next biggest party other than FG to if they wish to form a government. Likewise if FG do not increase their number of seats dramatically, and personally I cant see that happening, they will also have the same dilemma. As it stand I think we will still have a FF/FG or FG/FF government, despite FF claiming that the confidence and supply simply is not working. Will it be FF or FG in the driving seat, I think that's still wide open and all it will take is a bit of incompetence or a stupid remark (both parties being equally qualified at incompetence), to change that.
blanch152 wrote: » If Fine Gael lose seats, and become the second or third biggest party, that will be the second election in a row that they will have lost seats. From a tactical point of view, they will argue that the electorate don't want them involved in government and/or a confidence and supply arrangement. That would leave FF having to form a government from the rest or with Sinn Fein. Fine Gael would happily be the opposition to a Sinn Fein government, there would be plenty of opportunities.
efanton wrote: » FF might prefer LAB or the Greens but when push comes to shove and the numbers dont stack they will definitely consider a SF coalition. Would FG do the same, they might not, but I guarantee you that they certainly would give it serious consideration despite what they might be telling the electorate.
Loafing Oaf wrote: » Why didn't either of them consider it in 2016 then?
Dravokivich wrote: » SF made a point of saying they wont go into government under a coalition. Short memories seem to be affecting voters again.
efanton wrote: » Because they formed a FG/FF coalition, despite what either of them would like to call it.
efanton wrote: » No, that's absolutely not the case. Do you not remember at their latest Ard Feis where the party voted to leave entering a coalition as a junior partner as an option.