nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Meghan & Harry: WE QUIT

bitofabind

Predictable? Or will live to regret it?

https://twitter.com/piersmorgan/status/1214979436396855296

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

khalessi

He has a 30 million inheritance from Diana so mortgage no worries

melon_collie

Headline on tomorrow's Sun: MEGXIT.

rob316

Money from Diana and they get a share of Nana's trust fund every few years. Never will be a short of a bob

Canis Lupus

dhaughton99 wrote: »

You can hardly call her “black”.

PoCish

Itssoeasy

melon_collie wrote: »

Headline on tomorrow's Sun: MEGXIT.

You know they've been just waiting to use that headline since they got married.
How come Kate Middleton didn't/doesn't get the same treatment as Meghan markle seemed to get ?

PressRun

Supposedly Prince Charles has big plans to scale the whole thing back when he takes over. Lots of peripheral family members are going to have titles and duties taken away from them apart from those in immediate line to take the throne. The statement from the royal family seems shocked/pissed off, but maybe in the grand scheme of things, they weren't going to have much to do anyway once Charles gets the top job.
The issue with it seems to be that they want to keep their titles and make money off them? That's hardly allowed, is it?

Purple Mountain

I think Meghan is out to make a statement.
She came in all guns blazing trying to make her mark and do things differently and be seen to be trying to modernise the monarchy.
I feel she really took inspiration from the likes of #Metoo and #Timesup and Greta Thurnburg to try and push this as a time for change and that she would be instrumental in that change.
I personally think the monarchy is very stuffy and a serious cost to the UK state but at the same time I see her as acting like the smart ass kid in the class who thinks they know more than the teacher.
If they're stepping aside from the monarchy, they need to give up their titles and their Windsor Castle home plus pay for their own security detail going forward.

Obvious Desperate Breakfasts

Raconteuse wrote: »

Why is Meghan Markle disliked?

Fuck knows. Various derpy reasons are given. She can’t win, no matter what she does.

Church on Tuesday

I could never understand some people's obsession with the Royal family in this country.

It's truly baffling.

Raconteuse

Itssoeasy wrote: »

You know they've been just waiting to use that headline since they got married.
How come Kate Middleton didn't/doesn't get the same treatment as Meghan markle seemed to get ?

English and not American, white and not mixed race, not a divorcee, a "commoner" but still from a posh family, very quiet and lacking controversy/opinion (although I don't know of anything particularly opinionated about Meghan - the cheek to be a former career woman I suppose... or is it gold digger?)

Be right back

Purple Mountain wrote: »

I think Meghan is out to make a statement.
She came in all guns blazing trying to make her mark and do things differently and be seen to be trying to modernise the monarchy.
I feel she really took inspiration from the likes of #Metoo and #Timesup and Greta Thurnburg to try and push this as a time for change and that she would be instrumental in that change.
I personally think the monarchy is very stuffy and a serious cost to the UK state but at the same time I see her as acting like the smart ass kid in the class who thinks they know more than the teacher.
If they're stepping aside from the monarchy, they need to give up their titles and their Windsor Castle home plus pay for their own security detail going forward.

I think she thought she could modernise it and when she couldn't, decided to cut their losses and leave. Apparently they have surprised the monarchy big time.

JP Liz V1

matchthis wrote: »

Seems to be a sound lad

Harry totally smitten with Meghan, will do anything for her, good on them both quitting

screamer

JP Liz V1 wrote: »

Harry totally smitten with Meghan, will do anything for her, good on them both quitting

Many an idiot will do anything for their ball and chain, and some of them are very divisive and trifling. Sad for their families in these instances, but sometimes it’s a case of make your own bed.... lie in it

amacca

I had to raise an eyebrow at the becoming "financially independent" line

As if they wouldn't be without having to lift a finger even after severing all ties.

Strazdas

melon_collie wrote: »

Headline on tomorrow's Sun: MEGXIT.

Tomorrow's UK papers are also reporting they didn't even notify the Queen in advance and that Charles and William are said to be 'furious'.

Sardonicat

amacca wrote: »

I had to raise an eyebrow at the becoming "financially independent" line

As if they wouldn't be without having to lift a finger even after severing all ties.

Does this mean they won't have anyone to put their pyjamas on for them now?

Strazdas

screamer wrote: »

Many an idiot will do anything for their ball and chain, and some of them are very divisive and trifling. Sad for their families in these instances, but sometimes it’s a case of make your own bed.... lie in it

It reminds me a bit of Edward and Wallis Simpson (though quite a few historians reckon Edward was a complete waster and no loss at all to the monarchy).

JP Liz V1

melon_collie wrote: »

Headline on tomorrow's Sun: MEGXIT.

Sounds like an Asylum film

alan partridge aha

He's like a ventriloquist's doll, he'll do what she says. Can't see that marriage lasting though.

Itssoeasy

Strazdas wrote: »

Tomorrow's UK papers are also reporting they didn't even notify the Queen in advance and that Charles and William are said to be 'furious'.

Ah that won't help things. I mean she's not the first American to be involved with the firm or the establishment over there. I mean fair enough the last American who married into the royal family didn't work that well but still. And wasn't Churchills mother American ?

Itssoeasy

alan partridge aha wrote: »

He's like a ventriloquist's doll, he'll do what she says. Can't see that marriage lasting though.

I'd say that's why the child didn't get a title of any kind.

Sardonicat

alan partridge aha wrote: »

He's like a ventriloquist's doll, he'll do what she says. Can't see that marriage lasting though.

At least he speaks. Unlike the mannequin that is the future queen.

[Deleted User]

Strazdas wrote: »

It reminds me a bit of Edward and Wallis Simpson (though quite a few historians reckon Edward was a complete waster and no loss at all to the monarchy).

alan partridge aha wrote: »

He's like a ventriloquist's doll, he'll do what she says. Can't see that marriage lasting though.

And Simpson ultimately regretted the whole thing as she ended up with just a boring old man- the whole royalty thing was gone.

Pleasing Meagan today will likely lead to a lifetime of mediocrity for both of them- they will both regret it in different ways I think as the dynamic of their relation to date is wrapped up in the mystique of royalty- take that away and the cracks will quickly appear.

Itssoeasy

Sardonicat wrote: »

At least he speaks. Unlike the mannequin that is the future queen.

Which one of them ? There's two future queens ?

ceadaoin.

PressRun wrote: »

Supposedly Prince Charles has big plans to scale the whole thing back when he takes over. Lots of peripheral family members are going to have titles and duties taken away from them apart from those in immediate line to take the throne. The statement from the royal family seems shocked/pissed off, but maybe in the grand scheme of things, they weren't going to have much to do anyway once Charles gets the top job.
The issue with it seems to be that they want to keep their titles and make money off them? That's hardly allowed, is it?

Apparently they weren't supposed to be part of the scaling back, that was going to be more peripheral royals. Harry was always supposed to be a part of the core monarchy alongside William. That was the plan anyway but that's been scuppered now.

I dont particularly care for the royal family, but from a celeb gossip/scandal point of view this is all very interesting, even more so that will be in the history books eventually

Sardonicat

Itssoeasy wrote: »

Which one of them ? There's two future queens ?

William's wooden doll

Itssoeasy

Deleted User wrote: »

And Simpson ultimately regretted the whole thing as she ended up with just a boring old man- the whole royalty thing was gone.

Pleasing Meagan today will likely lead to a lifetime of mediocrity for both of them- they will both regret it in different ways I think as the dynamic of their relation to date is wrapped up in the mystique of royalty- take that away and the cracks will quickly appear.

It wasn't as if the duke and duchess of Windsor were on the scrapheap after the abdication and she did stay with the fomer Edward VIII all his life so there must have been something there.

chrissb8

An actual progressive Royal

Thelonious Monk

Wow. Prince Andrew has been cancelled, now we have Mexit. I wonder if interest will wane, my English friends are all pro royal though, they love them.

[Deleted User]

#MEAGANSIMPSON