tuxy wrote: » Depends, was it the Paddy's that told you that?
B.A._Baracus wrote: » Twitter bio says: "Author, Social Justice Activist, motivational speaker, Intercultural Consultant, researching race relations, racial stratification & the labour market" ... An obvious as*hole.
1800_Ladladlad wrote: » This is the kind of stupid that's being spouted and used in arguments?https://twitter.com/ashleymakombe/status/1212813684327759878 On a serious note, It terrible for the Irish whose parents were African refugees, who were born and raised in Ireland, getting racially abused by both sides for calling out the degenerate behavior.
NasserShammaz wrote: » She will 100% appear on Maura & daithi or the ****ing late late within the week, she is john waters she is Terry prone she is narcissist. Il expect a ban . She is the enemy. never confuse opinion with knowledge
Stateofyou wrote: » What an ugly side of humanity this post has mostly exposed.
tayto lover wrote: » Yes indeed. She doesn’t come across as a nice person at all. Always trying to find something to be offended by. She has her health and a good position in UCD and has made Ireland her home but can only find fault where there seems to be none. Sad kind of person imo.
Irish Guitarist wrote: » It's frightening the number of people telling her to report Twitter comments to the guards. One or two people have called her a cunt. Fair enough if you want to report that to Twitter, but the guards? Get a grip. The vast majority of the comments aren't even anything like that. They're just telling her she wasn't the subject of racism and making a joke of the absurdity of thinking it was. I'm serious when I say this is genuinely frightening. The day could come when just disagreeing with someone online or making a joke could result in the cops calling around to your door like has happened in Britain.https://twitter.com/EbunJoseph1/status/1213464247314743296
Stateofyou wrote: » Don't misquote me for your own agenda. Sad. I rest my case.
tayto lover wrote: » Then you need to state your case more clearly to express your agenda. Sad yes.
Stateofyou wrote: » What an ugly side of humanity most of the posts on this thread have exposed. Happy now? You're probably still sad.
tayto lover wrote: » No, unlike your friend who found fault where there was none, I’m a happy camper.
Stateofyou wrote: » And you know for a fact there was no fault. Didn't know I was speaking to the expert.
Stateofyou wrote: » What an ugly side of humanity most of the posts on this thread have exposed.
tayto lover wrote: » Then you didn’t read the thread entirely. She seems to have a habit of looking for things to be offended by. Posters have shared some of the things she complained about. It’s not an isolated incident. People like that are indeed sad.
Stateofyou wrote: » People are offended by a lot of stuff, no different than anyone else. Maybe the things she's been offended by are legit. And just because she's allegedly complained about other things, doesn't mean that what happened at the hotel was innocent. It is an isolated incident, it has nothing to do with anything else she has experienced. With the amount of racism and f'd up things I've encountered in my white and privileged life, I'm sure she could double that.
tayto lover wrote: » Maybe she’s just unlucky or maybe everyone is out to offend her.
tayto lover wrote: » Odd that then. I work with loads of people of all creeds, colours and sexualities. In my 28 years in the job there has been zero instances regarding anything racial. Yet she finds it everywhere. Maybe she’s just unlucky or maybe everyone is out to offend her.
Deleted User wrote: » Which is the wonderful premise behind the movie "unbreakable" Which is "maybe this person is a super hero!" or "maybe there is a statistical continuum of injury and disease - but if so then there _has_ to be someone who literally never gets any of them - and perchance he might think he is a super hero" its the same premise - albeit in reverse - that derren drown extorted to make one of his shows about horse racing
Stateofyou wrote: » Let me guess.... going out on a limb here... you're white? And so now you know the personal experiences of each and every one of your work mates. You can't be taken seriously. If you work with loads of people of "all creeds, colours, and sexualities" then there is going to be a much higher percentage than zero that something racial has happened. Don't see what bringing different sexualities into it has to do with anything racial happening or not. You've only made it clear that you're only on the most surface level, superficial level of acquaintance with anyone of color you know. They've had "racial instances," guaranteed.
tayto lover wrote: » She’s just very very very unlucky then.
tayto lover wrote: » There has never been even one single complaint. Lovely bunch of people or maybe they’re not super sensitive.
Deleted User wrote: » "unlucky" is a value judgment I guess. The moment you acknowledge a continuum of experience exists - is the moment you acknowledge _someone_ must exist in the middle of it. After that you just have to realise that the only thing that the fringes have to talk about - is the pool in the middle of the holiday camp
Stateofyou wrote: » Jesus, this is actually laughable. Complaints does not equal a "zero instance of anything racial happening." They happen, reported or not. And are you the intimate knower of all workplace complaints then? And your personal workplace experience and stats has absolutely nothing to do with this lady's experience in that hotel.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/v2/b605825002726fa398519aca553ff0db.svg)
