tomwaits48 wrote: » Interesting selection of Sinead O Carroll for the rugby v football debate, what was she meant to bring to the debate?
Hunky Monster wrote: » Diversity.
thenightman wrote: » No football show today? they're really milking the live pods too. If I had no interest in attending event in person, I definitely have no interest in listening to a recording of same.
Arghus wrote: » Thought the rugby chat was a bit of a wasted opportunity. Ken was up for it and was talking equal amounts of sense and absolute nonsense: just the right mixture of what you need to get a good debate going. Poor oul Jerry Flannery was out of his depth. I'd say it was killing him that he couldn't launch across and eye gouge Ken in order to win the argument, he just had to rely on stupid words. I usually think Sinéad O' Carroll is pretty good. People usually give out about here whenever she appears - but that's only honestly because she's a woman - but she was weak enough in terms of challenging Ken, it was like she pulled her punches for fear of insulting him. I concur with the majority of what he had to say about rugby, but even I could hear the flaws in some of his arguments, but she didn't really challenge him. A skilled debater could have made Ken look laughable, but she struggled to articulate basic arguments to challenge him. And as much as I like her generally and think she gets a hard time just on account of her gender, when she said "try being a woman for a day" I groaned because that had nothing to do with what they were talking about and that was a very weak attempt to try to win a few argument points.
Say Your Number wrote: » I never really got people being upset about the marketing side, as they said Sky hype the bejesus out of the Premier League and also AIB hone in on the volunteer/community aspect of the GAA, so it's not unique to rugby.
Arghus wrote: » And as much as I like her generally and think she gets a hard time just on account of her gender, when she said "try being a woman for a day" I groaned because that had nothing to do with what they were talking about and that was a very weak attempt to try to win a few argument points.
Ol' Donie wrote: » Just want to mention, thought, that while I laugh heartily at the nonsense of rugby marketing - Team of us and that shìte - GAA ads are somehow worse. #wearehurling and so on. And the absolute production line of this-is-what-it means-to-be-Irish bòllocks. Which, of course, is not confined to private schools.
corwill wrote: » And anything involving AIB can fü¢k right off, the zombie, bailed-out mofos.
Hippo wrote: » I've always been a huge fan of the pod, it does things that no other sports pod (or broadcast) comes close to. However at this stage I'd love to hear an alternative American voice to US Murph, who I feel doesn't bring much to proceedings.
Cienciano wrote: » Not a chance that will happen.
jaykay74 wrote: » Usually there's a review /ranking of audiobeds from the year unless I missed it? Maybe there wasn't enough new ones this year for it to make sense. I'm still not totally caught up as didn't listen as they were released over Christmas
Ol' Donie wrote: » US Murph is their best contributor, for my money (literally). Meanwhile, where's Glenn Whelan's Country Pages gone? Heh.
Brock Turnpike wrote: » None this year unfortunately. They would normally do it as part of the log cabin shows.
hankless wrote: » I don't thinks there's been enough new ones to merit it
Brock Turnpike wrote: » Mark Horgan's absence is keenly felt.