Greaney wrote: » The decision regarding the old track isn't 'everyone's to make, it's the decision of Irish Rail with the support of central government. Irish rail own the tracks, and roaring and shouting at them will achieve nothing. Just a reminder that after the 2012 AECom/Goodbody report was so favourable about the reopening of the line for rail, that a group got together to develop it further. But as we're all finding out.... it takes tiiiiimehttps://www.tuamherald.ie/news/roundup/articles/2014/03/28/4026145-athenrytuam-rail-action-group-launched-in-tuam
Isambard wrote: » you do the math. I'm saying it can't do a return journey in half an hour, or anything like it which it would need to to have a half hour frequency service. It's academic anyway. It wouldn't get a frequency anything like that. 4 or 5 return trips a day maximum would be my guess.
Isambard wrote: » I did not say it was impossible to do 60 mph I said it was impossible to average 100 km/h on a return journey of 50 km and I told you why when you asked.
Isambard wrote: » I have you sussed now....having read all 63 of your posts. Adding you to my blocked list now
Deleted User wrote: » This is why Athenry to Tuam will not be getting developed anytime soon. Not saying never, just not in my lifetime and I was born the year it closed to regular passenger traffic, 1976.
Deleted User wrote: » Let's say your Christmas wish is granted and it gets added to the queue for rail developments. There is still about 20 years worth of more important projects ahead of it. Thinking logically, if you have the choice between running a line to the airport or double tracking anywhere, or removing bottlenecks or Athenry to Tuam, which do you logically chose. This is why Athenry to Tuam will not be getting developed anytime soon. Not saying never, just not in my lifetime and I was born the year it closed to regular passenger traffic, 1976.
Greaney wrote: » But the thrust of what I'm 'standing for' on this thread is that I love greenways, but never at the cost of mass transit.
Quackster wrote: » Isambard is entirely correct though. Athey/Tuam is so far down the rail priority list that even if you trebled or quadrupled investment in rail (and I am absolutely adamant that needs to be done), there are so many much more important rail projects that would absorb all that investment. And then some. Everyone needs to be realistic that the line north of Tuam will never ever reopen and allow the greenway to proceed on this section ASAP.
Deleted User wrote: » There is no mass transit in existence on that line so no cost.
Muckyboots wrote: » Wait for it, wait for it ! There's one for everybody in the audience.... https://www.meathchronicle.ie/news/roundup/articles/2019/12/06/4183278-video-transport-minister-confirms-review-of-navan-rail-line-feasibility-will-happen-next-year/
Del.Monte wrote: » Surely a greenway would be a better/cheaper option?
wonder88 wrote: » The Galway Limerick route was fairly busy last Saturday, and two weeks ago, from my experience. The Oranmore station seems to be a success as well. The idea that there is no demand for rail in Ireland and car/road is what we want, may not be correct despite what Colm McCarthy etc says.
Greaney wrote: » No cost? Gosh where does one start... The cost ends up somewhere else...Galway traffic (for a start), which may end in the distruction of a community (Dangan)... Rural de-population Lopsided national development Lack of planning for future infrastructure Lack of affordable access to services outside of urban areas, for young people, the elderly, disabled Health & Well being Rural Divestment. The Enviroment Rural Isolation
marno21 wrote: » A review of the 2016-2035 NTA Greater Dublin Area Transport Strategy is being undertaken so this presumably is part of it.
Corca Baiscinn wrote: » Lot of exaggeration there if you're saying that a train line is the only solution to all of the above issues. Wouldn't that mean that Cavan, Monaghan, Donegal are all doomed? And how would a train from Tuam help people from there travelling to work in Parkmore? Most of the issues you cite would in fact be greatly helped by a Greenway. Brings employment so antidote to rural depopulation, brings people into an isolated rural area,supports health and well-being, good for the environment.
Lord Glentoran wrote: » The feet of greenway campaigners need to be held to the fire on this. Let’s watch what happens with Kingscourt one to see if all the magical regeneration happens, instead of another safe space for the Lycra clad.
PeadarCo wrote: » The demand for a greenaway on the Kingscourt line has been driven by locals. The line itself is useless as a passenger line without a direct connection between Navan and Dublin. Going by Drogheda will never work because buses will always be far far quicker going to Dublin(the main destination for commuter traffic) via Navan. Anyone fimilar with the Kingscourt line will also be aware how overgrown the former rail route is, to the point in large parts you wouldn't even know a railway line even existed. Also saying greenways are only used by people in Lycra really shows a complete lack of understanding on why Greenways have been so successful. The main reason being attracting people who don't normally cycle on the roads. Good railways are needed and there is a demand however I don't understand this obsession with old railways built in the 1800s. If you look other countries and the modern high speed lines, they built new railway lines that matched the population needs and technology of the modern day. The Bullet train in Japan being a classic example.
Sligo eye wrote: » Part of the issue is that while roads will always find the budget to be built and there’s always land to build them on as far as Official Ireland are concerned, when it comes to railways there’s always some bright spark who will ask about “profitability” and “oh it has to be such and such a density before we can build them” the same questions are never ever asked about roads. I’m thinking especially about the M9 motorway down to Waterford and indeed the Tuam bypass which if another country were considering them, they’d never be built as these roads aren’t exactly chockablock at the best of times. Yet no one dares question the “profitability” or density of the local populations for roads. The only way railways get opened in Ireland is when old lines are reopened. No one in the department of Transport and their bus loving chums in the NTA will sanction the purchase of new land for railways because guess what, there are bright sparks in the NTA who will ask about the “profitability” and the “density” before sanctioning any kind of spend on the railway. And then you have the keyboard warriors who despise the railway organising letter writing campaigns to their local councils and getting their “economist” pals whose think tank gets grants from the Ford Foundation etc. to write articles demanding more roads and less railways to ensure the car manufacturers stay in business rather than stopping and thinking, what does the environment and the economy really need?
[Deleted User] wrote: » That's an awful lot of tinfoil hats for a single post Re: Tuam bypass, prior to it being built, 30-45 minute tailbacks were the norm for trying to get through Tuam.
PeadarCo wrote: » The post also ignores all the protests around the M3 with one of the alternatives being proposed being just to widen the existing road and not build the M3. And that's just one example. It also really doesn't answer the question of why reopen closed lines built for technology that's now in museums. Most modern high speed lines around the world are purpose built. Many of these lines can compete with airplanes on short routes. Rails biggest advantage is that it can move large amounts of people between and in high density areas very quickly. The rail alignments built in the 1800s were for trains that were slower than modern cars/buses. Modern trains(never mind high speed trains) are a orders of magnatude quicker than was available/envisaged when the lines were built. Obviously in a lot of cases the relevant rail alignments will not match modern day requirements for train travel to be competitive with other modes of transport.
Sligo eye wrote: » Until we as a nation wake up to the environmental crisis we are in we will continue to literally drive towards the destruction of our environment.
Corca Baiscinn wrote: » Lot of exaggeration there if you're saying that a train line is the only solution to all of the above issues. .
Greaney wrote: » No I'm not saying that the train line is the only solution, I'm refuting the claim that building nothing has no cost. I believe neglecting public transport has a huge cost. There's plenty of info out there to support this claimhttp://www.politico.com/sponsor-content/2018/06/when-public-transithttps://www.nationalexpresstransit.com/blog/9-benefits-of-public-transportation/https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/aug/07/north-england-unreliable-public-transport-stops-poor-families-finding-workhttps://www.huffpost.com/entry/bad-public-transportation-transit-justice_n_5c0940d6e4b0bf813ef4f219?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAANoTnNlnTGReJJFrGnVW3U3dXvg10RNdzB7KKtYLxy8JDPJFlMe7Hb7AACj486FLJDNfpu2b8RFj4p3hap-yK1RTXIDpCwwaS_Ext3WccLX32TxmxT70LweHVYOhTLqRTi_A4JXpOkM7uxQlnQumxRtdOpc0qQyLIBm6oM8k6sKahttps://www.smartcitiesdive.com/ex/sustainablecitiescollective/top-10-benefits-public-transportation/1063096/ As for our dreadful habit of one off housing.... I totally agree. Furthermore I'm happy to learn that some places are catching up in building around public transport hubs, especially on the WRC where Craughwells ghost estates are full and Ardrahan has started to build for commuters On a positive note, I spotted this on the Greenway thread re; infrastructure, regarding the Dublin to Galway Velo, which is pre-approve funded, and communities along that route would do well to strategize developing 'loops' from it for tourism and cycling infrastructure.... ''...Separately, tenders have been sought for a contractor to work on the Greenway project from the west side of Athlone as far as Galway, and it's expected that a contractor will be appointed for this stretch of the project at some stage in the coming months. ''
Greaney wrote: » No I'm not saying that the train line is the only solution, I'm refuting the claim that building nothing has no cost. I believe neglecting public transport has a huge cost. There's plenty of info out there to support this claim.
Quackster wrote: » I don't think anyone here would argue against vastly increasing the funding of public transport. What is a fundamental basis of effective public transport though is the provision of the most appropriate form of public transport for the specific conditions and it should be abundantly obvious that rail is not always the most appropriate form of public transport.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w6.vanillicon.com/v2/62877c35768f143f69acd7bb6cd43f3c.svg)
