Tell me how wrote: » That record is stuck. Keeps repeating and making no sense. Not even funny either despite the repeated confirmations that you are attempting to be so.
gozunda wrote: » Well agreed you do keep repeating the same stuff for sure. If you move from vinyl to mp3 - that should help But yes - there some seriously hillariius posters on this thread that really deserve a gold comedy award for sure. Sure I wouldnt be in that league at all...
Tell me how wrote: » Repeated for those either not paying attention, or unable to remember, I've spent 40 years in Ireland and one in US.But, seeing as you flagged concerns in relation to US weather, maybe someone planning on retiring here would be more concerned about the climate than they appear to be. You might frighten them in to changing their mind! Or was that one of your jokes? It's as funny as the rest of them, to be fair.
Tell me how wrote: » Repeated for those either not paying attention, .
gozunda wrote: » No just wondered how those in the US see Ireland and whether most of them give us any thought whatsoever. If it was I'd be more concerned about flying backwards and forwards to the states and all those carbon emissions and the carbon footprint of the average person in the US rather than giving out to the folks back home. But that's just me. Also Ireland could be completely submerged by that point in time. We might not be here at all!
Tell me how wrote: » Micky32. This ones for you given you fly to the states 3 times a year.
gozunda wrote: » . Also Ireland could be completely submerged by that point in time. We might not be here at all!
Micky 32 wrote: » According to scientists 30 years ago , we all should have drownded by now. Lol
gozunda wrote: » Nope. Mickeys not preaching at all and sundry. That's the difference.
Tell me how wrote: » According to Doctors in the 50's, cigarettes were good for you... Knowledge improves as techniques emerge with both technology and studies carried out.
Micky 32 wrote: » Yes you’re right i don’t care. You don’t need to be a genius about the brainwashing, what 12 years to the apocalypse lol
Micky 32 wrote: » Yes but the smokers did die. However the scientists that predicted the areas that were supposed be under water isn’t. Not really a good comparison.
As far back as 1982 – 37 years ago – scientists working for oil and gas giant Exxon expertly predicted the shape of climate change to come. With chilling, unnerving prescience, they foretold the very future of human-made global warming and plotted its calculable trajectory. Then, they buried it.
Akrasia wrote: » If you have no interest in something you cannot tell real from fake. It’s almost definitional
Tell me how wrote: » Sure, go that route, if you wish. How about this from 1982.
Micky 32 wrote: » What a load of nonsense lol
Tell me how wrote: » gozunda wrote: Well agreed you do keep repeating the same stuff for sure. If you move from vinyl to mp3 - that should help But yes - there some seriously hilarious posters on this thread that really deserve a gold comedy award for sure. Sure I wouldnt be in that league at all... Most definitely.
gozunda wrote: Well agreed you do keep repeating the same stuff for sure. If you move from vinyl to mp3 - that should help But yes - there some seriously hilarious posters on this thread that really deserve a gold comedy award for sure. Sure I wouldnt be in that league at all...
Tell me how wrote: » Says the person bleating on about it being a humorous thread....
Micky 32 wrote: » You were directing at all the posters on here that aren’t brainwashed. Ah sorry did i butt in on your all grown up conversation?
Tuisceanch wrote: » What do you also think climate scientists don't employ the scientific method? If that's what you believe well good for you but that's a short discussion. You're saying that all posters who agree with that point of view represent those who aren't brainwashed by whatever it is you're referring to. Did you survey them beforehand before making your assertion? In answer to your question ..yes but no worries you probably just got a little over excited and thought everybody was taking an interest in your conversations. I can assure you I have no interest in your current conversation.
Tell me how wrote: » Tell us how it is nonsense. You have admitted you don't care about the climate issue. You have demonstrated your unawareness in relation to this (option of using refillable container over plastic bottles seemed new to you). So, it seems unlikely that you have researched the topic to become informed.
Akrasia wrote: » Where is your source for this because I strongly suspect that you are remembering what you are being led to remember by people who want you to oppose action on climate change
Micky 32 wrote: » Nor do i have an interest in yours . But i’ll refresh your memory i don’t care so reply to someone else.
Tell me how wrote: » It's telling that the Greta worshippers on this thread are at pains to point out that one or more of the following applies to them, they have no interest in the thread topic, they do not believe there is a problem with greta and alarmism , they do not know what tongue in cheek humour is but are still highly motivated to take part in the discussion. I have to say, it comes across as some sort of a neediness to remain involved with so little to offer by their own admission.
Tuisceanch wrote: » Well you did because that's why you butted in. You're mixing me up with another poster because we haven't talked before so you can't be refreshing my memory about anything. You seem very angry about something? Are you sure a thread in a forum discussing a current affair is where you're meant to be?
Tell me how wrote: » It's telling that the Greta detractors on this thread are at pains to point out that one or more of the following applies to them, they have no interest in the topic, they do not believe there is a problem, they cannot offer any solutions but are still highly motivated to take part in the discussion. I have to say, it comes across as some sort of a neediness to remain involved with so little to offer by their own admission.
Micky 32 wrote: » I am not a bit angry in the slightest. Life is great at the moment. My reply was directed at you because if you had read the thread you would have known i don’t care hence why i was refreshing your memory.
Tuisceanch wrote: » You don't care so much about anything that you needed to respond to a post that didn't concern you in the slightest to tell me that you're not interested and don't care. Why? That seems quite mad to be honest.
