tuxy wrote: » I've done this, taken shelter in the hope that rain dies down. If it doesn't it will get to the point where I'm really knackered and just want my own bed so will head out into it again.
smelly sock wrote: » Yeh i know that this is alleged to have happened. But the latest media reports suggest he was accidently killed on haddington rd. You actually have to dig for the article that says he was brought to a house. I still think he must have got further than we think. Even if a struggle were to happen with the amount of traffic on the road it would have been copped. Its possible TD also went to the property of his own accord.
BDI wrote: » Have you a link to the article that says he went to a house?
andekwarhola wrote: » I socialised in town plenty back then too and well remember the taxi situation. I know that area well. Even had friends on Wilton Place. Ending up in an impromptu taxi share outstde a pub or at a rank is different to approaching a stranger asking them to drive you home. I agree with FTE though. It's not beyond the bounds of possibility at all that the guy was just sheltering or asking for change or smokes. The fact that he turns away crestfallen looking would back that up. Also if he's supposedly stalking TD, he's not exactly going to stick around with his colleagues at the gate I would have thought.
smelly sock wrote: » Motive??
STB. wrote: » A lot of these lads would struggle to spell motive. FFS. Motive. You really have no idea how many drug ravaged lunatics are out there. Dealers had addicts killed for insignificant debts. Their motivation is money. Drugs make people do crazy stuff.
Fr Tod Umptious wrote: » There is none There is no motive for a criminal gang to watch or follow or attack someone like Trevor with premeditation. What got the last thread closed was people creating a narrative around Trevor that supplied a motive for him to be targeted. If he was the victim of a random attack on a quiet street then that's terribly sad and not unheard of, but IMO he was not the victim of a premeditated attack.
smelly sock wrote: » I agree. It wasnt premeditated. I do believe however the criminal gang didnt just target him either. This wasnt a mugging gone wrong. If we are to believe he ended up in a house threatened at gun point it was hardly with the intention of robbing his wallet. Someone was pissed off enough with him to do that.
misterme123 wrote: » Also, the enhanced footage that revealed MIB outside the bank for 30 minutes prior to Trevor's arrival; presumably Gardai had studied the footage but couldn't make anything out. (I don't see why the CCTV was quite so bad even in the year 2000, but that's another story.) Then 17 years later it was enhanced and revealed MIB's movements. I'm just curious about the technology. You can't increase the resolution of a picture. Can they combine data from the CCTV with information about the light sources to generate an image?
JaimeLannister wrote: » No theories to add but just a few observations on the cctv footage:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RcYxruBEmFE 1. As Trevor is leaving his workplace at around 4.02.02 on the timestamp, someone walks by on the street outside from left to right. They seem to be wearing overalls/wet-gear. Were they ever identified? Presumably showed up on the cctv from gate1 carrying on walking in the same direction and so deemed irrelevant 2. On the Milanos/Haddington Rd. footage - when Trevor leaves the frame, you can see his feet (or maybe reflections of his feet) in the puddles at the top of the screen. Around 4.14.45 in the top left puddle, and then at 4.14.55 looks like something moving to the right. It's possible that Trevor crossed the road at this point. A car drives by at 4.15.05. Was this car/driver ever identified or sought out? 3. This PontaSix video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FWX1owMUA6E) includes additional footage of MIB when Trevor's colleagues arrive at the gate (albeit they are blacked out). The final 15 secs or so of this video includes some grainy images of MIB and Trevor's colleague (?) looking in the gate. Surely if the same CCTV enhancement techniques were used on the footage where this image came from, as with the footage of Trevor arriving, the gardai would have a pretty clear image of the MIB? Which could be released to the public? It's possible they know who the MIB is and do not need any public assistance in identifying him
KWAG2019 wrote: » The extra footage of people outside the gate has, of course, been addressed by now. TD’s workmates and the MIB. Workmates were identified years ago. The point about whether the MIB is already known/ probably known to police is well made. Extra footage may have been released in documentary. The puddle reflections were discussed in previous thread. I’m not sure if also here. If and it is a big if, they indicate TD crossing road then it MAY indicate that he was going to take the next right turn which brings him down two lanes toward his flat. Others in different threads have pointed out that there is no footage from the Israeli embassy (at the end of these lanes) that TD emerged from those lanes or from the US embassy nearer his flat. Whether the reflection in the puddles indicates that is speculation. Whether he took those lanes is speculation. We simply don’t know. If you look at the Haddington Road footage released by the police I don’t think it lasts long enough imho to see if the puddles reflect any activity after the man following TD.
DmanDmythDledge wrote: » I don't think it makes sense he would have used one of those lanes to return home rather than using Pembroke Road. I think he's either heading for Percy Place or the spar on Bath Avenue. Other posters have mentioned the 24 hour spar on Upper Baggot St but that's further out of the way than using the one on Bath Avenue and heading to Serpentine via Landsdowne Road.
Knine wrote: » Was there any evidence he actually made it home to his flat?
Fiftyfilthy wrote: » No it’s not, spar is 30 seconds from him in the cctv
Fr Tod Umptious wrote: » Yes there was a Maxol station there, but the Spar people are referring to is Bath Av/South Lott's Rd. I personally thought he was on his way to Spar until it was pointed out Maxol was right next to him.
Lollipops23 wrote: » None AFAIK. Tbh I always wondered if he decided, given that his flatmates were away for the weekend, to pay for some 'female company' for the night. People do it all the time nowadays with the advent of Tinder and the like when they've been on the batter all night. Maybe he was haggling a price or a pro's boss didn't like the look of Trevor for whatever reason.
tdf7187 wrote: » The Haddington Road route is a way to get home, it's not the most direct route and not the route I would have gone but maybe it's the route he preferred for whether reason. I really don't think it's much longer distance wise, someone more technically adept than I could use Google maps to test distances and so on.
Assetbacked wrote: » I have 17 mins versus 12 mins from Google maps measurement.
TwoMonthsOff wrote: » If he wanted a brass surely he would have picked one up by the time he got to the BOI on haddington road. Hes heading away from the action there