Lina Limited Workaholic wrote: » Am I right the ATM he was last seen at is where Milanos is now , just after Haddington Road intersection with Northumberland Road
sugarman wrote: » No, KellyKelly is right. It was on the Haddington Road side where the ATM was. Here an old image from before it change over to Milanos. The CCTV Camera he was last recorded on is seen to the right ..and you can just about see the boarded up ATM.
The Nal wrote: » Ah ok, did they move it after that? I defo remember taking money from an ATM on the Baggot St side of the building before.
Lina Limited Workaholic wrote: » By Baggot St side you mean where the woman in striped shirt is walking?
sugarman wrote: » Heres an even better image with people at the ATM
EmmetSpiceland wrote: » He’s 30 minutes waiting before Trevor arrives but how long is he waiting at the gate around the corner after Trevor goes inside?
tdf7187 wrote: » So shelters from the rain for 40 minutes but then decides - while it's still lashing as is apparent from the footage of Trevor alongside Milanos- sure I'll lead off now, I've had me shelter for the night.
tuxy wrote: » I've done this, taken shelter in the hope that rain dies down. If it doesn't it will get to the point where I'm really knackered and just want my own bed so will head out into it again.
Fr Tod Umptious wrote: » MIB is huddled waiting for the rain to ease up. Trevor comes along, MIB hears him on phone talking to security, MIB thinks Trevor is getting his car. (and there is parking in there)MIB asks Trevor if he is driving in a certain direction. Trevor says no, MIB looks dejected. Asks the colleagues a few minutes later the same, same answer. MIB heads off. Completely and utterly plausible and natural behavior. I would have done it myself. Trevor does not mention it to the guy in the office as it's completely inconsequential. Colleagues may have recalled it but asking about a lift on the night of a taxi strike is such an obvious thing to do that the Gardai took little notice of it, i.e it was not the kind of breakthrough they were hoping for, it was just a guy looking for a lift. Why he has not come forward ? Never put two and two together at the time of the original appeal. God knows where he is now.
BDI wrote: » Lads there so much creative writing going on here but it’s really bad stuff. We don’t know how the man in black feels, we don’t get a sense of the security guard, who is he, what motivates him, Is the man in black married, is the security guard just one day from retirement Basically what I’m trying to say is what is the story with people making up bad fan fiction here. It like some sort titalation going on. It’s a local murder case not a hasbro board game. Should really be ashamed of yourselves, some of you.
andekwarhola wrote: » People here are saying they'd ask a drunk stranger on the street for a lift at 4am? Wtf.:D
tdf7187 wrote: » Taxi strike.
Fr Tod Umptious wrote: » So firstly Trevor does not seem drunk, even though he has been drinking. There is plenty of video evidence to show that he is fairly steay on his feet at the time. Secondly the MIB may be drunk or may have been drinking and thus does not notice Trevor's state as much as a fully sober person would. And thirdly as already pointed out, taxi strike.
andekwarhola wrote: » I'm sure it's not impossible that some nutters would ask such a thing of a complete stranger, was just surprised to hear anybody admitting it.
sugarman wrote: » I mean just think about how many times youre asked for both in Dublin City Centre.
sugarman wrote: » Yeah not buying it myself, if he was near a car... maybe. But its much more likely he was just asking for money or a smoke. I mean just think about how many times youre asked for both in Dublin City Centre.
andekwarhola wrote: » So?
Fr Tod Umptious wrote: » I'd ask that question if I was stuck out in the rain on that night in the year 2000, it's not that uncommon or at least was not that uncommon, and I'm not a nutter.
tdf7187 wrote: » Genuinely don't get you. Have you lived a sheltered existence or something. .
tdf7187 wrote: » Correct. That area of Dublin was full of young people socialising and very few taxis around. That's my recollection of that era, having, you know, lived it.
andekwarhola wrote: » I socialised in town plenty back then too and well remember the taxi situation. I know that area well. Even had friends on Wilton Place. Ending up in an impromptu taxi share outstde a pub or at a rank is different to approaching a stranger asking them to drive you home. I agree with FTE though. It's not beyond the bounds of possibility at all that the guy was just sheltering or asking for change or smokes. The fact that he turns away crestfallen looking would back that up. Also if he's supposedly stalking TD, he's not exactly going to stick around with his colleagues at the gate I would have thought.
sugarman wrote: » He wasnt just shot on the street you mad thing! Someone would have seen / heard that for sure in a residential area. I once heard someone being shot 3 streets over late at night. He was alleged to have been brought to a house and threatened with a gun and the gun was accidently discharged killing him.
Alliance123 wrote: » Guys, Trevor was a marked man that nite for whatever reason. Maybe as he used that route so much the 'pimp or pimps' were familiar with him. As Wheel20 pointed out the MIB was caught by the bollix when he followed TD who then slowed down on the call. MIB couldnt do anything then as TD was chatting to the security guy to open gate. If the MIB didnt know TD or his movements then why did he stop exactly where he knew TD was going to stop? He could have stopped anywhere and had NO reason for stopping there whatsoever. There is no real shelter there, could easily have found a bus stop for better shelter. Ive no doubt MIB is the reason TD remains missing today sadly.