Fr Tod Umptious wrote: » But what do you think they are holding back and why ?
20Wheel wrote: » Gardai should just release full CCTV at this stage. After this long there's only potential gains to make. (Within reason. Blur anything that might need to be)
smelly sock wrote: » Could be other reasons too. Who knows.
20Wheel wrote: » Then what's to lose.
smelly sock wrote: » You would imagine if they are holding something back its not of benefit or relevant.
Fr Tod Umptious wrote: » The last thread descended into a mess. People speculating that Trevor was buying drugs, paying for sex, involved in criminal activity based on his work, found out about criminal activity because of his work and we as taken out by higher up because he was going to be a whistleblower, taken out by the girl in Alaska's family because he visited when he was not invited. All based on people's wild imaginations. If I were a family member I'd be disturbed by some of the s**t spouted on it too.
tara73 wrote: » I ask myself this too. Basically it's the same stuff being written and speculated about like 2 years ago. It's just a question of time theories becoming very personal regarding TD and therefore hurtful to the family. why wait for this to happen...??
mrslancaster wrote: » It must be so sad for his family to have no answers after all these years. There was a link posted earlier to a youtube video that showed three men standing outside the gate and looking in after TD had gone inside. Didn't see it before, its at 19.28https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hS6GUgJ4y0E Hope the gardai get some information to help his family.
On April 7, Crimestoppers launched a renewed appeal for missing Trevor Deely. “Forensically-enhanced’ CCTV footage was released showing a man standing outside the back entrance of Trevor’s work that Gardai now wished to question. Some of the footage, however, had been used previously in a 2015 TV3 documentary and, in one screen grab, a second man (not Trevor) can be seen next to the person of interest. Filmmakers David Lester Mooney and Mark Kilbride, having discovered this anomaly, then spotted a third person in another image (top). This afternoon, David and Mark were contacted by a Garda officer who stated that these two new figures have “previously been identified” as Trevor’s work colleagues.
Day Lewin wrote: » Straight down Pembnroke Rd, past the hotel and the RDS, onwards a wee bit, turn left. Every other route is more wind-y and takes longer. I went to school very near there and I lived on Waterloo Rd for a while. Somewhat before Trevor's day but the area really hasn't changed that much. I know that district really well. Yes, always the "professional" ladies and the potential customers ("Doing business, luv?") but also generally a bit of Garda presence too, keeping a discreet eye. It would make no sense to take any other route.
Lina Limited Workaholic wrote: » what would you guys that know the area consider the best route from baggot st bridge to his flat?
Fiftyfilthy wrote: » It’s the annual anniversary which in turn becomes the annual appeal Maybe there is a new witness but it’s more to appeal to the public Threads like this are a positive ,once modded respectfully. People well may be asking the same questions but there’s a small chance someone could read this thread and something triggers. It’s a very small possibility but at this stage anything is worth a shot.
KWAG2019 wrote: » I suppose we all have our own niggles about this case but your post is part of what niggles at me: assuming out of all the possibilities that there is some sort of violent confrontation why is it necessary to dispose of the remains?
KWAG2019 wrote: » I don't agree in general that because things are hurtful or upsetting they can't be discussed but Boards is a private closed system and can largely do what it chooses to do.
Lina Limited Workaholic wrote: » i was trying to find a map to mark his route but could not get one with all the locations, baggot bridge is not shown on one. Prob not zoomed in enough Has anyone got one. I was trying to see all the locations in one map.
Fiftyfilthy wrote: » So why print about the new witness? Everybody just stop wondering and forget about it then?
LLMMLL wrote: » Why is this thread allowed continue when the family asked the previous thread be closed?