SEPT 23 1989 wrote: » Might help to build community relations
anewme wrote: » I saw the whole video on Facebook this morning. The person who posted the video was looking for people to share and to sign some petition against the Garda. Well, it totally backfired with the majority of people slating the skangers when you could clearly see the bike on the ground. Most said we need more Gardai like him. In response the actual family came on and started abusing everyone who disagreed with them calling them nosey aul cnts and so on. It was hilarious. Someone described it as porn overload for Grammar Nazi's.
Calhoun wrote: » I wonder what real punishment you could put in place, as much as i would love for them to get sense knocked into them it wont work. What is the answer to crap like this.
893bet wrote: » Feral scum. Thanks **** I no longer have to live near this type. It can only get worse in the next 50 years. I am getting more and more right wing based on this type of crap.
Ninthlife wrote: » Financial penalties as in deduction or suspension of any welfare. Also if housed by local authorities they should also hit them with an anti social behaviour penalty. None of the above can be rescinded or paid by cribbing to community welfare officers or local TDs. Repeat offenders have payments stopped in lieu of community work.
Ninthlife wrote: » Yes, always wear protection
Calhoun wrote: » I suppose the fear of that is though you push them further into crime if you cut off assistance. I don't know if you saw the town in the UK where they tried this, it featured on one of those welfare programs and crime really increased. I think we might need a system which has both a carrot and stick in it, right now it just seems like allot of carrot and no stick.
endacl wrote: » Some estates need to have a massive wall built around them. Nobody gets out without showing a leaving cert.
Dravokivich wrote: » That'll just affect other dependants who may be innocent to the offence in question. It's all well and good throwing out fines or insisting on deductions when it has no impact on yourself.
Ninthlife wrote: » Not my problem. Dont be a scumbag and there wont be an issue
Dravokivich wrote: » That's exactly why you can throw out such comments. You dont have to deal with it, so dont want to think about it.
Calhoun wrote: » I suppose the fear of that is though you push them further into crime if you cut off assistance. I don't know if you saw the town in the UK where they tried this, it featured on one of those welfare programs and crime really increased.
BattleCorp wrote: » Forgive me here but why would someone be searching the internet for a receipt for a scrambler similar to the one in the clip? It was hardly to cover up the fact that it was a stolen scrambler, was it?
Always Tired wrote: » Most minor crimes already come with a financial penalty in the form of fines anyway.
SEPT 23 1989 wrote: » I don’t want to derail the hate but with all these kids into bikes would it be outrageous to suggest the council build a few tracks around the city to let them burn off a bit of energy
10pennymixup wrote: » If only the mother had been sprayed splayed 20 years ago, none of this would have happened,
Calhoun wrote: » I think we might need a system which has both a carrot and stick in it, right now it just seems like allot of carrot and no stick.
Gatling wrote: » We're funding the lifestyle choices so yeah we should have a say .