Cordell wrote: » Call me out on the things I say, but don't imply that I say the wrong things on purpose, whatever purpose that may be. To be wrong is one thing, to be, as you put it, deliberately wrong is a totally different thing and I've no interest in the latter.
terrydel wrote: » I think Ireland is economically speaking, as far from socialism and its ideals as it has ever been. .
We need some kind of social democratic system that has a fairer distribution of wealth and resources, moves away from the idea of consumerism and towards sustainability. How we get there is an entirely different debate.
terrydel wrote: » Well you are wrong in this case.
Deleted User wrote: » The Irish free state was created by people who admired Russia. ie. their perception of what socialism entailed. Not necessarily the communism that evolved, but what was known at the time. Which was very little, considering the lack of communication. Modern Ireland is a socialist society with a capitalist economy. Socialism tends to appeal to politicians who want the poor vote, and Ireland has been poor many times. What we really need is a reset button, with the removal of political families, the banning of corporate contributions in political processes, and a system of accountability for politicians/public servants. Democracy can only work when it's servants are held accountable for their actions. Ours aren't. Modern democracy doesn't punish politicians and officials who are corrupt. It rewards them. But that's not going to happen. To be honest, I feel that democracy in the West is essentially dead. What happened after the Banking crash confirmed that for me. The lack of punishment for the politicians or banking reps along with the bank bailouts just confirmed to me that the citizens have little real power in western countries. It's been a few decades since they did except on minor issues. I often wonder do Europeans realise just how regulated their lives are? Licenses and degrees are needed for just about everything these days...
Cordell wrote: » I'm open to corrections, but: trade unions protect the interests of their members, that is, among others, they prevent non-members from accessing their jobs. While this may help with the "race to the bottom" issue, it also keep non-members into poverty. They are generally highly corrupt and essentially run by self serving individuals that are worse than politicians.
terrydel wrote: » I'd prefer if we were far more socialist as a society, especially in terms of removing the power of the church from our system of education. It is an absolute scandal that they still own and operate such a large % of that education system after the crimes they committed and facilitated.
And it always staggers me how little Irish people seem bothered by the fact that the banks did what they did and handed us and the next few generations the bill and walked away essentially unpunished. We just dont seem as a people to care about that at all.
Our facilitation of corporate tax avoidance on a grand scale is perhaps the thing that bothers me most about our neoliberal economy, it is beyond a joke at this stage. Its almost like they are laughing in our faces with it, especially as the latest recipients are instututional property investors right at a time when we have the biggest housing crisis in the history of the state.
Totally agree on the reset button, our political system is it entirely self-serving, existing only to ensure the status quo and give us the illusion of having a choice. The entire public service is unaccountable, the maurice mccabe scandal has proved that beyond doubt, Francis Fitzgerald actually got monetarily rewarded for her role in it!
Cordell wrote: » If it makes you happy you can read all my posts as: In my opinion which is open to correction and may be wrong, because it's just an opinion as I'm not the keeper of facts: <post>
Deleted User wrote: » I received both Church and State education. The church education was excellent, and they didn't do anything to anyone while I was there. I don't particularly like this blanket criticism of the Church. They've done a lot of good in this country over the years. Don't get me wrong though. I'm essentially anti-religion, but, in terms of education, they're not terribly bad in comparison to state education. In fact, in some ways, they're superior. Really depends on the particular institution and how it's operated. Short attention spans, and being more concerned with immediate problems. I remember the outrage after the banking crash. I genuinely thought for a few months that we might see people march on Dublin to burn out the politicians. Nothing came of it. That was the end of my hope for real change in this country. I tend to laugh when people criticise China for it's corrupt society, because from what I've seen in four decades, is similar corruption in western countries by officials. Western countries just hide it better. Yup. The American model is to be lauded and copied as much as possible. While everyone seems bent on criticizing Trump, it's worth considering how much the personal net worth of Clinton, Bush, Obama increased while they were in office... Trump entered with Billions already and seems less interested in being bribed. He's still a muppet, but probably a reasonably honest muppet, in comparison to past presidents.
terrydel wrote: » Its certainly not blanket criticism on my part, I have no interest in organised religion but each to their own is my view, whatever gets you thru the day. I just strongly feel that the level of abuse they committed and facilitated and then covered up and have so far refused to properly compensate for, was serious enough that they should have been removed from any role in education.
Edgware wrote: » Well he did run the moneylenders out of the temple in Jerusalem
realitykeeper wrote: » Well none of us are perfect.
Were all socialists spoilt as children?
Junkyard Tom wrote: » Funnily enough socialism, as it was applied in the former eastern bloc countries, allowed little room 'spoilt children' as everyone had to work and most of the employment was grafting in agriculture and industry. Full employment is a feature of socialism whereas capitalism accommodates spoiled-bratness for privileged children, which, combined with the welfare state, can accommodate reduced-work lifestyles. Summary: OP is spouting shite.
ToddyDoody wrote: » This wouldn't be one of those provocative threads now would it?
realitykeeper wrote: » And he said in a parable that the workers in the vineyard should honour the agreement they made with their employer.
Cienciano wrote: » ... socialist system like they have in the Nordic countries ...
Day Lewin wrote: » Was reared a socialist. In fact my Da always claimed to be a Communist. In that most painful of environments, middle-class poverty. Surrounded by mé-féiners and ex-rural gombeenmen, he was scrupulous about social justice and completely devoid of snobbery. The complete opposite of "spoilt" OP, what are you on about?
milehip wrote: » How is 'middle-class poverty' more painful than the poverty suffered by any of the other classes?
Edgware wrote: » Luke 10.7
realitykeeper wrote: » I agree which is why I think the minimum wage should be abolished and market forces ought to be the sole determinant of the worth of labour.
Junkyard Tom wrote: » Summary: OP is spouting shite.
Deleted User wrote: » I tend to laugh when people criticise China for it's corrupt society, because from what I've seen in four decades, is similar corruption in western countries by officials. Western countries just hide it better.
Yup. The American model is to be lauded and copied as much as possible.
realitykeeper wrote: I agree which is why I think the minimum wage should be abolished and market forces ought to be the sole determinant of the worth of labour.
Wibbs wrote: » I was with you up to these parts: Western nations have a long way to go, some more than others, but China is a totalitarian state where any criticism is stamped on, where surveillance of the citizenry is off the charts and in the open and getting worse year on year.