liamtech wrote: » think this is the vote coming up soon - this is the last speaker before the vote - anyone wanna call this? sadly i think this might pass
Kermit.de.frog wrote: » Labour desperately don't want an election. They are now saying they are available right now for a deal of between 7 - 9 days for the timetable. They want to do everything to obstruct without causing an election.
Deleted User wrote: » Anywhere you can watch brexit debate live?
sondagefaux wrote: » Many affluent areas had a majority vote in favour of Leave too. The biggest indicator of voting Leave was age, closely followed by formal educational attainment level.
Spanish Eyes wrote: » Well if the progamme vote is passed, it will be a fait accompli now, kind of like the opposite to filibustering to oppose it. That MPs could actually vote for such a thing is beyond me now. But why am I surprised? I place my trust in the Lords. They won't stand for this bullsh!t. I hope anyway. But not sure if the Progamme Vote needs Lords approval. Anyone know?
Capt'n Midnight wrote: » Just for the record , - because this is just as important as the future of the 66 million people living in the UK. Is it Lions and tigers and bears, oh my! Nope. There's six reindeer, four zebra, camels, three raccoons, a fox, a macaw, and a zebu.
sondagefaux wrote: » My post was in response to an implication that only poorer areas voted majority Leave. That was not the case.
Joe_ Public wrote: » The wild animals and circuses act was in relation to 19 animals. Na na na na na 19!
Spanish Eyes wrote: » Eh, there were disaffected ignored in so called poorer areas voting to Leave too, you know.... in the hope things might improve for them. Unfortunately the Parties that gave them an austerity kicking do not care about the great unwashed At All, and will continue to kick them when they are down. They don't care. Sad times for the aspirations of those people, and everyone else, it has to be said. (I sound like Marian Finucane there).
prawnsambo wrote: » As I'm tired of saying, the EU won't grant an extension of a few weeks, they'll at least give the three months asked for. And they will (as before) allow an exit on the first day of the month following the passing and ratification of the WA in all stages. It's mad that there are people commenting on Twitter with such authority when they haven't read the salient documents.
liamtech wrote: » Well sky and the Beeb definitely stating that this is the closest of the votes, and is simply to difficult to call - more labor leavers may well vote for this - So yea i guess all eyes on 7pm me thinks Do we fully know whether a defeat of the first will cancel the second vote? My understanding is VOTE ONE - Bill itself putting beginning process of translating deal to law VOTE TWO - timing and schedule EDIThttps://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-50142367 Im totally confused cause the BBC just stated first is bill itself - and this article, also BEEB says if timing is defested bill will be pulled ???? Do we have one of those very informative charts per chance - with all remaining outcomes and timelines?
Letwin_Larry wrote: » most of these poorer areas voted LEAVE. these areas have been ignored and neglected for decades, certainly since Thatcher destroyed them. so along comes the referendum and for the first time in ages they have come out and engage with the political process and vote, but the REMAIN side is desperate to ignore/twart their vote. it's no wonder they are cheesed off.
prawnsambo wrote: » The EU well know that this isn't possible. But they also know that most MPs couldn't read a line of text without forgetting how it started. So they'll wait as long as possible before granting an extension. Partly because of the above and partly because there are so many possible outcomes, not least a GE that could manifest in the next week. I have no idea what Corbyn will do. But polls aren't looking good for him at the moment. So an election manifesto is needed first.
liamtech wrote: » Would you agree that the EU are giving BoJo a chance to get his deal across the line? i suspect if they immediately gave a 3 month extension then there would be no excuse (on either side HOC) for not having an election - And in the case of the election do you believe JC would actually push for an 'Ill get a better deal (renegotiate)' PLUS referendum - cause that seems to be Labor - Renegotiate and Referendum - would he have a chance in that scenario?
Spanish Eyes wrote: » Acceded to by the Speaker! OK the legislation will be later on, but it is a shoo in, if the Assembly continues to mess around and refuse to reconvene anytime soon The Assembly yesterday refused to appoint a Speaker and Deputy Speaker so it all went South after that (pun). DUP must be raging, and I don't care much anymore now. I think if all other reps had said NO to abortion and SSM, they would have said YES. It is very difficult for me not to castigate them, but I will try my best to be civil.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Point of order: SSM and Abortion rights became legal at one minute past midnight today.
Spanish Eyes wrote: » but with abortion and SSM being introduced soon also, .
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wc.vanillicon.com/v2/c4aa3ee9bc3008484c19c6523bc72ddf.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w2.vanillicon.com/v2/24615175400ae675a1f589d8e5bd3285.svg)
